Sir Ilpalazzo
Member
On the subject of third-party characters, I know that realistically only characters who are big icons for their companies at the moment, but I'd like it if, aside from Sonic and Snake, the third-party characters were characters who were heavily associated with Nintendo because they had classic games on Nintendo platforms or something. Like, if they just lifted the character lineup from Super Mario Crossover and used Ryu Hayabusa, Mega Man, Bill Rizer, and Simon Belmont, that would be cool with me.
If you were picking from a variety of series and not just going with a bunch of Mario and Pokemon characters, I bet you would end up getting the majority of the characters who were actually in the first Smash Bros. Both F-Zero games were million-sellers, Jigglypuff was a big mascot at the time (although I bet people making this hypothetical choice would have thought of Mewtwo first). Marth and Lucas, at least, were pretty obvious picks too.
I think if you look at this from the perspective of someone who just plays some Nintendo games but isn't an ultra-hardcore fan who goes on the Internet and reads discussion about this kind of stuff, then you might get totally blindsided by the characters in each Smash Bros. But I think that excluding the retro characters, Melee's clone characters, the non-Nintendo characters, and some of the oddball choices like Pokemon Trainer and Zero Suit Samus, none of the games have rosters that are that crazy to forum people like us. With every Smash Bros. game that comes out, we're getting a better and better understanding of where Sakurai is coming from when he picks the characters for each game.
Can we go back to this...
...for just a second?
I know I've said this before, but: At what point in any of the 3 Smash Bros games have they gone for the most obvious choices? If somebody told you to pick the 12 most notable Nintendo characters when the original was released, would you pick Fox, Captain Falcon, Ness, Jigglypuff, hell, even Samus at that point?
For Melee, Ice Climbers, Marth, Mr Game & Watch (and that's not even touching the clones, which were pretty much 50% absolute oddball choices). And in Brawl, even as we got more and more people speculating and calling for 'out there' choices, shortening the group of true 'surprise' characters, we still got Pokemon Trainer, Wolf, Lucas AND Ness (how could they both be in?), and, of course, the grandaddy of all weird choices, Snake.
Why, suddenly, would Smash 4 play it safe?
If you were picking from a variety of series and not just going with a bunch of Mario and Pokemon characters, I bet you would end up getting the majority of the characters who were actually in the first Smash Bros. Both F-Zero games were million-sellers, Jigglypuff was a big mascot at the time (although I bet people making this hypothetical choice would have thought of Mewtwo first). Marth and Lucas, at least, were pretty obvious picks too.
I think if you look at this from the perspective of someone who just plays some Nintendo games but isn't an ultra-hardcore fan who goes on the Internet and reads discussion about this kind of stuff, then you might get totally blindsided by the characters in each Smash Bros. But I think that excluding the retro characters, Melee's clone characters, the non-Nintendo characters, and some of the oddball choices like Pokemon Trainer and Zero Suit Samus, none of the games have rosters that are that crazy to forum people like us. With every Smash Bros. game that comes out, we're getting a better and better understanding of where Sakurai is coming from when he picks the characters for each game.