What response are you after? I don't know why people would care about whether a character is male, female or otherwise, this isn't a game where the characters have to be made up and can therefore just as easily be male or female, the Smash Bros cast is made of established characters of which there are a huge number more notable male characters than female ones. Palutena would be a good character, but the reasons for which are not dependent on if she is or isn't female.
I agree that Palutena is a great choice regardless of her gender (perhaps the only good female newcomer choice).
However, the point of that post was talking about how vocality and loudness within the Smash Bros. fanbase create a picture that is unlike what the rest of the actual fanbase is interested in.
I mean just look at Geno. He probably has among the loudest fanbases out there, yet there are several Mario characters in which there is a higher demand than for him. I mentioned female characters in that post because many possible female newcomers end up having fanbases with supporters that are very vocal and loud in regards to their inclusion, yet the actual size of their fanbases relative to other characters for Smash 4 (with the exception of Palutena, and possibly Krystal and Dixie Kong), is actually quite small.
3. Mewtwo (by far the most popular and iconic legendary Pokemon, and overall probably in the Top 3 most popular Pokemon ever.)
8. Takamaru (by far the best choice for a retro revival newcomer, and by far the best choice for a katana-user).
False. Mew is both more popular and more iconic.
I think that there are better choices for both, like StarTropics' Mike Jones and Samurai Goroh.
You seem to be quite passionate about this series and that's great, but your arguments would be a lot stronger if you didn't treat your opinions as infallible facts.
I disagree on the Mewtwo thing - since again, those are just based on online polls, and we all know how shit those are.
Yeah no, using IGN is just using Kotaku for Pokemon reference.
It seems as though whenever something is presented that runs contrary to whatever someone believes they rather just deny it than offer something else on their side.
I will play devil's advocate and say that Mew is more popular than Mewtwo. However, even if it were that the case, Mewtwo is still by far the most wanted Pokemon for Smash 4 (and one of the most wanted characters for Smash 4 in general).
I don't even know why you two are picking a fight with me on this aside from you guys having a beef with Mewtwo. I think there is no denying that Mewtwo is among the most popular and iconic Pokemon regardless of what you two would like to believe.
Don't want to get involved in this but I'd say a poll about Pokémon conducted on Pokémon.com holds at least a trillion time more credibility than one by IGN.
According to a poll I conducted with random people on the street, Leavemealone is the most popular Pokemon.
According to a poll I conducted with random people on the street, Leavemealone is the most popular Pokemon.
If Mewtwo was more iconic, why would they use Mew over it time and time again?
Everything's possible, you're at the helm. Screw logic.
Which 9 characters would make it in?
Some how, I was envisioning a gangsta Pokémon, but I suppose that works too
According to a poll I conducted with random people on the street, Leavemealone is the most popular Pokemon.
A gangsta who wanks?
No one commented on this post, probably since I posted it at the bottom of the previous page, so I am just going to post it here.
One thing I find strange is that Little Mac has a ton of support (he is virtually tied with K. Rool on Shorts's poll), yet very little vocal support.
The other thing is Palutena. She pretty much shows how much popularity a female character can get even if all the stars align for them. I mean even if the diminished newcomer pool that Smash 4 has, she is overall the seventh most-wanted character for it.
By all the stars aligning I mean:
- Has had a recent game.
- Is largely deemed sexually attractive.
- Undoubtedly very important to her own series.
- Does not have a male counterpart that is seen as a higher priority than her within her own series.
- Is largely seen as bringing something completely different to the table in terms of moveset.
- Not divisive.
Especially in Palutena's case, she has had her game developed by Sakurai, so he is already personally aware of the character.
I mean with all of that Palutena still ranks at number 7 despite her being practically the picture perfect female newcomer. Though to be fair to her, she pretty much has more support than any other "new" character (though technically Palutena was created in 1987, she is basically a new character in terms of support due to her re-design and her vastly fleshed out personality from Uprising, and how basically nearly all of her support grew out from 2012).
Thinking about it all in general, the "wee need moar femalez" crowd is pretty much just a very loud minority, considering that aside from Palutena, the only other female characters with a large amount of support are Krystal and Dixie Kong, and even those two characters are miles behind Palutena (and a lot of other characters in general).
The "moar femalez" crowd usually does not bring up Dixie Kong (and sometimes not Krystal), but instead characters like Captain Syrup, Mona, Ashley or some sort of female FE character (support is divided for who it should be), and all those characters have far less support than even Dixie Kong (who has less support than Krystal, who has far less support than Palutena).
I just think its funny how depending on how loud people are you would think there exists far more numbers for them than there actually are, or depending on how quiet a character's support base is, their numbers can be vastly underestimated (see Little Mac).
Is Pokemon Cycle gonna affect Smash Cycle?
Is Pokemon Cycle gonna affect Smash Cycle?
Bingo. We can have both.She could be both playable and appear in Pit's Smash Taunts--Falco and Wolf both appear in Fox's (and Fox appears in their's).
...That completely slipped my mind, lol.She could be both playable and appear in Pit's Smash Taunts--Falco and Wolf both appear in Fox's (and Fox appears in their's).
...That completely slipped my mind, lol.
Either way, I'm still not so sure that she'll be included as a playable character. I mean, there are bigger franchises that don't have more than a single character (F-Zero, for example). With only three games, I'm not so sure Kid Icarus is going to get a second character, even with Sakurai having developed the last game.
...Then again, you could make the argument that EarthBound/MOTHER only has three games yet it has two characters. Who knows. I think it makes more sense in MOTHER's case because each game stars different characters. Kid Icarus features the same main character throughout all three games.
Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see her as a character. Palutena is awesome. They could definitely make her work as a character...but the question is would they? She's never actually been playable before, and all characters in Smash Bros. have been playable in some form except Sheik and Ganondorf, I believe. She seems more of a support character than anything else. Though she is the titular character of the series in Japan...
It could go either way, really. I'm interested to see how they'll handle the Kid Icarus franchise in the next Smash Bros. It's definitely going to get more representation in some way.
I get what you're saying and for the most part I agree.
KI is series of only 3 games (2 were retro enough to get Pitt into Brawl and the last one is 20+ years after those old games and was ok-to-successful afaik) yet somehow it should get at least 2 smash reps where as people aren't even sure a long standing series like FE can get pass the 2 character mark without Roy's return?
However, I do feel that KI will get a 2nd character (who it will be, IDK). And I'm OK with that ... so long as rep is properly divided with other currently popular BIGGER series. For example, I have said it many times before but yeah ... I can't see why KI would get more characters than Wario. Wario is a much bigger and well known series that has a TON of games and many success stories sooo yeah, I think it warrants 2 or 3 characters to rep it in smash (Mona or Cap. Either could be an interesting character and both rep different sides of the series).
Same for FE, it's proving to be a hit state side with the more recent games and I think it deserves 4 characters given the context of it's game (I would greatly prefer them NOT to simply be 3 blue haired sword guys and Semi-Clone Roy. The series has so much to offer that it's to see it wasted).
It could go either way, really. I'm interested to see how they'll handle the Kid Icarus franchise in the next Smash Bros. It's definitely going to get more representation in some way.
I want a Fire Emblem character who rides a horse the whole time.
I wamt floating polygonal head Iwata in smash.