Nintendo stock reaches all time high. 95 billion dollar company valuation. 14 billion dollar cash. NO DEBT. Which studio should they buy???

Kotaro

Kotaro

Member
Nintendo is swimming in cash. Which studio should they buy??

leYiuTa.jpeg


finance.yahoo.com

Nintendo Co., Ltd. (NTDOY) Stock Price, News, Quote & History - Yahoo Finance

Find the latest Nintendo Co., Ltd. (NTDOY) stock quote, history, news and other vital information to help you with your stock trading and investing.
finance.yahoo.com finance.yahoo.com

24Yf5CY.jpeg
 
MercurySteam. The developer is capable of making great games(Castlevania: Lords Of Shadow, Metroid: Dread), but they need guidance. Monolith Soft needed Nintendo as well. I keep telling you guys that MercurySteam should do a remake of Zelda 2.

Grezzo is also an easy pick.
 
Last edited:
they can buy whatever studios dont interest me. They can buy EA and Ubisoft, i don't care. Dont buy anything good though, im not gonna buy your console anyway.
 
onQ123 said:
Rare!
Click to expand...
No point. Virtually none of the old guard work at Rare anymore. They'd be buying a name. Microsoft would still own all of the IP, Banjo, Conker, Jet Force, Sea of Thieves, and even Grabbed by the Ghoulies. This is why despite Sony buying Bungie, Halo isn't on Playstation (yet).

Nintendo would be much better off buying Playtonic, which does include a number of old devs from that SNES and N64 era of Rare. I don't know if Yooka-Laylee has the pull to warrant a studio purchase, however. Playtonic might also prefer to remain independent.
 
Last edited:
It's good to have a war chest and still be careful about spending too much just "because you can".

As some of us are old enough to remember, Nintendo needed that big war chest to weather the drag of the 3DS/Wii U generation, where they went for a period of years and had multiple annual net losses, due to poor sales.

The business is cyclical, costs are skyrocketing, and they won't be riding this high forever. But, yes things do look very healthy for them right now.
 
Last edited:
Dr. Wilkinson said:
It's good to have a war chest and still be careful about spending too much just "because you can".

As some of us are old enough to remember, Nintendo needed that big war chest to weather the drag of the 3DS/Wii U generation, where they went for a period of years and had multiple annual net losses, due to poor sales.

The business is cyclical, costs are skyrocketing, and they won't be riding this high forever. But, yes things do look very healthy for them right now.
Click to expand...
AHAHA THEY STILL MADES PORFIT
 
Dr. Wilkinson said:
It's good to have a war chest and still be careful about spending too much just "because you can".

As some of us are old enough to remember, Nintendo needed that big war chest to weather the drag of the 3DS/Wii U generation, where they went for a period of years and had multiple annual net losses, due to poor sales.

The business is cyclical, costs are skyrocketing, and they won't be riding this high forever. But, yes things do look very healthy for them right now.
Click to expand...
The path for Sony console is pretty predictable, more power and speed.
Where would Nintendo go from here. I think they have finally settled on the form factor with Switch and just keeps adding power in a smaller screen which should be cheaper.

Next battle would be cloud gaming in a decade or two for sure where Nintendo might just fail or stick to their guns.
 
I'm not a stock technical chartist, but I just notice this basic pattern, a break out of multi-years cup and handle. This is EXTREMELY BULLISH. If they execute Switch 2 launch correctly, the multi year target could be as high as $45-$50 or even more (Not a financial advise, but just from my basic knowledge of stock TA)

UNsgd93.jpeg
 
They should buy as many studios as they can and raise prices to 120$ with no discounts ever. That'll make some of you happy.
 
They could buy Mercury Steam obviously. Better output than Retro and they work well together. I don't know that they really need to buy much though. They usually put out 4-8 1st party titles a year at this point so they're honestly about at release capacity. It doesn't scale up forever. People only buy so many games.

I could see them buying a CG animation company to try and make more movies or shows in house. They pretty much have their games division in working order and I forsee expansion into other areas.
 
Last edited:
Although no need to buy full, funding sega might do good future, i recall there are rumour in last decade, which Nintendo + Sega : ))

Imagine the possibilities...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Nvidia is the World's First Four Trillion Dollar Company
2 3
129
177
RickMasters replied
Call of Duty Mobile made 3 billion dollars in its lifetime
25
119
Dorfdad replied
Half a Billion Dollars Potentially Invested in MindsEye
Opinion Rumor Business  2 3
124
1K
Nydius replied
Sony Market Cap Hits $160 Billion For The First Time In Its Company History!
Sales-Age  2 3 4
173
2K
Ebrietas replied
Why they are not constantly remaking all the classics - all the time?
2
67
263
Hudo replied
Top Bottom