Title of the movie had a grammatical error:
No! Time to Die
I was beaten to the punch.
I wasn't a fan. Turning bond into a wick-esque killing machine for scene after scene after scene really devalues the spy aspect of the craig era.
I liked the increased gadgets.
I'm VERY confused about almost all of the plot. What did Remi Malick do with blonde lady after he pulled her from the lake? Was he 15 at the time? How was Blofeld able to talk through the eye while in prison? How was Remi able to plot so intricately with NO ONE ever even suspecting his massive infiltration of both MI6 AND spectre? Isn't this the second time Craig has fucked off to a tropical island after a boo-boo? What "secret" did blonde lady even have? She had no idea Remi was even involved till he showed up in her office, right? So what info about his secret not so secret base could she have given and how did Blofeld know ANY of this from jail?
I'm just gonna watch up to Blofeld from here on out, maybe through the Norway forest. I liked the Felix send off and I hope Ana is code name Felix from here on out and isn't a lesbian, just a normal cishet straight woman who is able to resist bonds charms, surely money Penny can't be the only one.
Where the hell did you find all this out?The movie definitely requires some mental gymnastics to connect certain dots, its third act is pretty messy.
Safin saved little girl Madeleine and just, you know, let her go. The reason he looks practically the same 25 years later is because he uses gene therapy on himself [I had to look this up, the movie makes no effort to explain the insane age gap].
Blofeld's eye is just a dumb McGuffin. It's a bionic eye with an internet connection, basically. Like many of these movies' techno babble it's best not to overthink the mechanics of the eye.
Madeleine's "secret" is that she had a kid and didn't tell Bond. Blofeld knew because he's Blofeld and knows pretty much everything [previous movie deals a lot with Spectre gathering intelligence on an insane scale]. Not an earth shattering secret I guess, but I suppose Bond was never to find out. Remember that Blofeld's entire motive is to "ruin James Bond's life", nothing more nothing less. Dude is petty as fuck. Blofeld probably also knew that Madeleine was saved by Safin as a kid, but how that is in any way a shocking secret is beyond me.
Movie was ramping up for some great intrigue but completely dropped the ball in the third act by making the antagonist's motivations extremely unclear and also not delivering on any of the narrative setups.
I don’t think they are going to reboot with the black lady. This continuity is over. The new continuity might have Ralph Fiennes and Ben Wishaw (like how they kept Judi Dench from the Brosnan movies). Hell, i wouldn’t be shocked if they had Judi Dench be in the next continuity.Jesus fucking wept they killed Bond...
Why?
I think they may go with a 007 spinoff with the black girl and if it bombs (more than likely) they'll then reboot a proper James Bond movie, but even still they really didn't need to kill him off especially after him finding out he had a daughter, other than that it was a decent show, ranked for me..
Casino
Skyfall
No time to Die
Quantum (yes I liked it)
Spectre
Why didn't anyone bother to search Blofeld from head to toe before locking him up? I mean, this is supposed to be the most dangerous criminal in the world?
Why didn't Bond just jump into the ocean to avoid the missiles?
Bond needs bad guys to kill for plot to continueWhy didn't the bad guys just stay locked up in the control room instead of coming out one at a time to let Bond kill them?
Why didn't anyone bother to search Blofeld from head to toe before locking him up? I mean, this is supposed to be the most dangerous criminal in the world?
Why didn't Bond just jump into the ocean to avoid the missles?
So many plot holes in the movie in the end it just got too much for me to bear.
For me the best scenes were the really long opening sequence and the fishing boat escape. Everything else was meh or just John Wick jerky camera gun-fu.
Hardy is older now than when Craig started (Craig was 38 in Casino Royale, Hardy is 44). They probably want to go younger. Craig was blowing out his legs by his second movie.I hope the Tom Hardy rumors are true.
Tom Hardy Reacts To Those James Bond Rumors, Gets Approval From One Of Daniel Craig’s Co-Stars
Sounds like Tom Hardy fans aren't the only ones pulling for him in the race for 007.www.cinemablend.com
They could have just had himnBond needs bad guys to kill for plot to continue
The Blofeld with the robotic eye whilst locked up in a maximum security prison was a massive plot hole tbf, you're telling me MI6 with all its incredible tech didn't once think to body scan him before locking him away, also how in the fuck did his eyeball communicate outside his cell, he on WiFi 20
Bond stayed on the island cause he had the nanobots on him with the DNA sequence to kill his missus and I assume his daughter so he couldn't risk them leaving the island and passing on and eventually killing them.
Do you think they are going to hire Christopher Nolan to start the new continuity? I remember hearing rumors about that. If its Christopher Nolan/Tom Hardy i will be so HYPEHardy is older now than when Craig started (Craig was 38 in Casino Royale, Hardy is 44). They probably want to go younger. Craig was blowing out his legs by his second movie.
People who start rumors of a Bond “continuity“ don’t know anything about Bond.Do you think they are going to hire Christopher Nolan to start the new continuity?
James Bond shouldn’t die. It’s a key attribute of the character that he doesn’t. He’s a man called James Bond who gets into exceptionally dangerous scrapes and doesn’t die. Those are the three main things. Everything else is subject to change: his appearance, accent, the extent and nature of his misogyny, his choice of gun, his favourite car. They’ve had him drinking Heineken for the last couple of films and it just about holds and we all understand it probably buys us a couple of extra car chases. Fine. But if you make him die, you might as well change his name to Eric. I wouldn’t have minded a film about someone called Eric Bond who died. Instead of the dangerous scrapes, it could be a family drama about the scourge of cancer.
As a result, every film, every scene, every hat landed on a hatstand, every grin at Desmond Llewelyn’s sternness, is now brutally recontextualised. When Connery wins at roulette, when Roger Moore attempts re-entry, when Pierce Brosnan merrily drives a tank through St Petersburg, they are all portraying a man destined to lie bleeding, heartbroken and alone, missing the daughter he never really knew, waiting to be blown to bits by his own country’s missiles. It’s quite the buzzkill.
But if you make him die, you might as well change his name to Eric. I wouldn’t have minded a film about someone called Eric Bond who died.
There is an scene of M looking at paintings of other Ms and another 007, right in the movie. Can they not take hints?The hell is all this supposed to mean? Craig’s Bond was clearly in its own continuity (Blofeld’s story alone confirms this, along with other factors), so why the fuck would him dying affect what happened to the prior films? If you want to claim all the pre-Craig films are in the same continuity, that’s more believable, but claiming the Craig films are in the same continuity is almost as stupid as claiming the Burton/Schumacher Batman films are in the same continuity as the Nolan films.
Also, heartbroken and alone? The man got to know he had a child who would be raised by a woman he loved and they would be safe now. And physically he was alone at that moment but obviously not truly alone, he had a good amount of people who cared for him. Christ, he died saving the world, but this article makes it seem like he died pathetically. For fucks’ sake, M flat out spells out for the audience what Bond’s life meant for them all, but I guess the article writer was too butthurt over a Bond film deviating from the norm he couldn’t pay attention to the answer being flat out spoon fed to them.
And cheap shot bringing the pandemic into all this. Heaven forbid they keep to a schedule and such and can’t always adjust elements in time. And besides, yes it’s not the happiest time in the world, but I’m not able to tell a writer what they should or shouldn’t write when it comes to tone. If you’re not ready for darker stories, then avoid them, and if this article writer couldn’t figure out the Craig films would be darker based on the endings of Casino Royale, and Skyfall as well, well geezus this guy is beyond dense.
Also funny how no one bitched when Logan did THE EXACT SAME THING because thankfully everyone who saw that movie understood how continuities work (hell, based on the timeline of when the movie says mutant powers stopped emerging, it’s strongly implied the film is even a separate timeline from the Days of Future Past ending timeline), and so we didn’t have to endure idiots going, “how could they do this, now he can’t be in the MCU!” Thank you, people who saw Logan, for actually using your brains.
Jesus fucking wept they killed Bond...
Why?
I think they may go with a 007 spinoff with the black girl and if it bombs (more than likely) they'll then reboot a proper James Bond movie, but even still they really didn't need to kill him off especially after him finding out he had a daughter, other than that it was a decent show, ranked for me..
Casino
Skyfall
No time to Die
Quantum (yes I liked it)
Spectre
I find myself asking myself: Would it really ruin anything if this was the last Bond film they ever made?
The Broccoli's bank accounts. And that's the biggest factor in that decision.I find myself asking myself: Would it really ruin anything if this was the last Bond film they ever made?
I'm just saying.It would ruin my mood, for starters.
What a weird question.
The Craig films are my favorites, but I will admit, they're not as rewatchable as the older ones. I think this movie might be quite rewatchable, although as a whole, it might be the worst of the Craig Bonds. It felt like the story was paint-by-numbers, but the action was ratcheted up a ton. The return of gadgets was nice too. But it's weird that they can't have a good story while still keeping the action.With 25 or so entries I could certainly subsist entirely on the existing films for scratching any bond itch. And the craig films are dour, uncharismatic, and "not fun" enough that if they continue in that vein the perpetual rewatchability of new bond films is rapidly fading.
I want more bond but if it's gonna be 5 years between films then I'd rather they take fewer risks and make each one a more "classic" Bond film.
The guy directed the shit out of the action scenes. He had wide shots and still managed to convey intensity Sam Mandes completely failed to bring in both Skyfall and especially Spectre's hilariously tranquil chase sequence.Movie released in Australia this week so finally saw it last night. Enjoyed it a hell of a lot.
I can't wait to see what Eon do with James Bond next and I really can't wait to see Cary Fukunaga's next movie. Going back to the action, there are so many amazing camera angles used in the set pieces which just kicks up the adrenaline. Loved the single take stairwell shootout too.
Bring on more.
The guy directed the shit out of the action scenes. He had wide shots and still managed to convey intensity Sam Mandes completely failed to bring in both Skyfall and especially Spectre's hilariously tranquil chase sequence.
I am a sucker for beautiful cinematography, but Skyfall went to far with its long shots. I am glad we have a director who knows action in charge of this franchise. After the awesomely shot Casino Royale, Quantum, Skyfall and Spectre back to back was disheartening.
My issue with Bond dying is that it's too cliche. They were trying to subvert expectations by killing off Bond but ended up falling into the trap of many franchises that have no idea how to end without killing off the lead character. I thought giving Bond a kid and a happy ending wouldve been a less cliche way of ending a franchise that typically has Bond go through women like wildfire.
The way they did it is also lame. So they created this mcguffin virus out of nowhere in the movie, and poison him. Ok. How is that related to the overall character arc or the overarching plot of the franchise? If anything, blowfield shouldve been involved in the finale with his last big fuck you to Bond seeing as how they blamed him for every rotten thing to ever have happened to Bond. Just inventing a new villain and having him be the reason Bond cant see his kid grow up is lame.
I dont know. i thought the first two acts were brilliant. The intro is legendary with a phenomenal introduction of Rami Malek's villain, and an incredible setpiece in Italy. Ana De Armes was incredible in Cuba. The best Bond girl since Eva Green, but I just didnt buy the final island setpiece. It left a bitter taste and movie pretty much ended on a whimper.
I hope they do a remake of Dr. No/Thunderball next with….idk… Tom Hardy?