ManaByte
Member
Here's a new link:
http://s11.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=0Z1DOWV7Q2TZV067UV6K7G90BD
BEST TRAILER EVER! AMAZING.
http://s11.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=0Z1DOWV7Q2TZV067UV6K7G90BD
BEST TRAILER EVER! AMAZING.
borghe said:grats scoot.. sounds like everything I am hoping for.. I already know the story, so your description is even that much sweeter by being vague about specifics but going into how and why everything works.. thanks!
the only other thing I want to know is about the digital version, so hopefully someone sees that and chimes in in this thread.
Scoot said:Yeah dude, I wouldn't come in here and spoil specifics. Because to me, the movie isn't about the details this time. It's about this tremendous fall, something Lucas has built up to (awkwardly and at times, poorly) but fully realizes here.
The relationships in Episode III are genuine, something Lucas couldn't really pull off in TPM or AoTC. They felt wooden, or plastic-y, like several of those other films' set pieces. Here, everything coalesces, only to be defamed by both new relationships and the swift strike of a lightsaber.
AniHawk said:Thanks for your impressions of the movie. Now, if you had to rank them, where would it fall?
mattx5 said:All the reviews have been excellent, but they all mention the lack of that scene, and personally, George has really made me steamed with this exclusion.
No George. You can't mention a character who died two movies ago in passing, especially not when it turns out that he plays a major role and holds a revelation related to the nature of the force.
When people hear Yoda tell Obi-Wan that he chatted with Qui Gon, the audience is going to say -
"Who? Oh, that dude who died in TPM? When did Yoda talk to him? Why didn't they show it? He taught Yoda how to live on after death? How? Why didn't they show that? How did Qui-Gon learn this?"
Fuck George, it's not even the gap in the force ghost theory that dissapoints me, it's your fucking ridiculous editing choice. You can't introduce a major concept like that out of the blue. We need to see it, not be told it in passing. You might as well have not mentioned Qui Gon at all. Of course, all the SW whizzes will blindly accept this decision because they already know everything there is to know about the Star Wars universe, and anything that isn't in the film, they just magically imagine it in their heads.
I'm a huge SW fan, but when I see my fellow SW nerds throwing the concept of proper editing and writing out the window, it makes me feel embarassed.
In any case, I'm still seeing the film opening night, and am still highly anticipating it (reviews have been very positive so far).
borghe said:do we hear qui-gonn speak in the movie?
ManaByte said:No,because the rumor is that Liam refused to do it. People said that was BS but since he isn't in the movie it may be true.
Tabris said:You gotta admit, no matter what anyone thinks of Hayden's acting, he's SO got the looks down in this movie!
cvkpaladin said:Question regarding Qui Gon Jinn
Okay, if noone knew how to become a ghost-type being after death except for Qui-Gon who told Yoda, who then told Obi-Wan, how did Anikan learn how to do it at the end of Return of the Jedi? Will that be explained as well in the movie?
Tabris said:Not reading it
I think I may have figured out who Grevious is based on the trailers. Total guess here.
I think he's Maul.
Tabris said:Not reading it
I think I may have figured out who Grevious is based on the trailers. Total guess here.
I think he's Maul.
Manabyte said:I don't think it's in the movie, but apparently it's Anakin's "reward" for fulfilling the prohecy and bringing balance to the Force.
Dead said:I can't believe a Wookie does the Tarzan yell :lol
The final episode of George Lucas' cinematic epic "Star Wars" ends the six-movie series on such a high note that one feels like yelling out, "Rewind!" Yes, rewind through more than 13 hours of bravery, treachery, new worlds, odd creatures and human frailty. The first two episodes of Lucas' second trilogy -- "The Phantom Menace" (1999) and "Attack of the Clones" (2002) -- caused more than a few fans of the original trilogy to wonder whether this prequel was worth it. The answer is a qualified yes. It did take a lot of weighty exposition, stiffly played scenes and less-than-magical creatures to get to "Star Wars: Episode III -- Revenge of the Sith." But what a ride Lucas and Co. have in store!
The Force returns with most of its original power regained. Concluding entry in George Lucas' second three-pack of space epics teems with action, drama and spectacle, and even supplies the odd surge of emotion, as young Anakin Skywalker goes over to the Dark Side and the stage is set for the generation of stories launched by the original "Star Wars" 28 years ago. Whatever one thought of the previous two installments, this dynamic picture irons out most of the problems, and emerges as the best in the overall series since "The Empire Strikes Back."
Entertaining from start to finish and even enthralling at times, "Sith" has some acting worth writing home about, specifically McDiarmid's dominant turn as the mastermind of the evil empire. McGregor remains a steady presence, and both Portman and Christensen have loosened up since "Clones" to acceptable, if hardly inspired, levels. Expressiveness of the digitally animated Yoda, voiced as always by Frank Oz, is amazing.
for me, I knew every single thing that happened in The Phantom Menace before I saw it and the movie was awesome. Then I went to the theater.Birbo said:Do you know everything that happens in the movie? And if so, does that decrease your anticipation at all for it? Just wondering.
Revenge of the Sith isnt just a great Star Wars movie, its a flat out great film. Yes its technically proficient and yes its visually beautiful. Those things are a given. What hasnt been is how solidly the film is constructed. Revenge of the Sith is a powerful, big budget experience. Yet it is the way that it fits so wonderfully into the existing Star Wars mythos that best sells it, the way it nestles so nicely into 1977s Episode IV: A New Hope that makes it special. The real beauty is that you could easily toss out the previous two awkward attempts, watch only this in sequence with the original films, and come out completely satisfied. Attack of the Clones and The Phantom Menace are best forgotten. Lucass real miscalculation was in not making this movie right from the start. He tried to stretch the story when all we needed was Vaders rise in its purest form. Star Wars fans have finally been rewarded for their patience. This is it, dont miss out.
While it's safe to say that STAR WARS, EPISODE III: REVENGE OF THE SITH will not be in competition for the Best Film Oscar next year, the story might be different if there were a category for Most Improved. For surely under that criteria, it would win in a walk. Its two predecessors in the Star Wars canon -- the dreary and dour Phantom Menace and the incoherent Attack of the Clones -- not only disappointed fans and confused casual audiences, but also sullied memories of the original 1970's trilogy, diluting the saga of the Skywalker clan and their imaginative universe. For many, the newest efforts by George Lucas can still be summed up in one phrase: Jar Jar Binks.
Which will make the experience of the final film in the series, REVENGE OF THE SITH, an unexpectedly sweet pleasure. A dark and gripping slice of space opera, it successfully avoids the pitfalls of its predecessors with a dense but cohesive narrative, strong character development, and a grand, epic struggle between the forces of good and evil. The Star Wars-ian mythology is expanded in careful detail, with new additions to the legends as it comes to its conclusion. Perhaps most importantly, director/screenwriter Lucas finds surprising and satisfying ways to connect this generation's characters (Anakin, Padme, et al) to the next (Luke, Leia), even as the modern triptych completes the circle back to where it all began: long, long ago in a galaxy far, far away.
Lucas' screenplay is his strongest in years, and even contains a few barely-concealed critiques of the Bush Administration and the Iraq War. The commentaries on democracy are offered in direct counterpoint to a government that is clearly overstepping its bounds, and the parallels are obvious to anyone looking for them. While Bush might not be an evil emperor (yet), it's not that far a trip from Senator Palpatine to Tom DeLay.
Its contemporary resonance, however, is subtle, and never gets in the way of the entertaining journey. REVENGE OF THE SITH may not be the series' best (that title still goes to Empire), but it can comfortably sit in a place of privilege among Lucas' six efforts. In the end, its greatest accomplishment may be to nullify the weaknesses of other, lesser installments. The lingering memories of Jar-Jar are forgiven (almost); George Lucas has shown us how to dream of galaxies again...and how fun he can make an afternoon at the movies.
Tortfeasor said:The theater of preference (AMC Downtown Chicago - the best theater in Chicago) had it showing on 18 screens at 12:01am on the 16th/17th but they were all sold out. I called the theater and spoke with someone who told me that some star wars clubs bought out all of the tickets for a majority of the theaters, including thier beiggest screen that has the digital display.
Iceman said:"Lucas' screenplay is his strongest in years, and even contains a few barely-concealed critiques of the Bush Administration and the Iraq War. The commentaries on democracy are offered in direct counterpoint to a government that is clearly overstepping its bounds, and the parallels are obvious to anyone looking for them. While Bush might not be an evil emperor (yet), it's not that far a trip from Senator Palpatine to Tom DeLay."
Saw STAR WARS III this afternoon at a press screening in D.C.
We can't, and won't, reveal anything, natch, but forget that stuff about this being too violent for kids. It's fine...There's dark psychobabble and violence, yes, but the kids will be so taken by it that there will be no problem at all.
This is BY FAR the best of the recent three -- not hard to accomplish -- but more, this SW really delivers. It is totally satisfying, the opening battle is just plain awesome (you feel like you're falling into the screen), the Haydensen (sp?), guy playing Anakin Skywalker is still totally dreadful and Yoda is fantastic. The film never gets cute like the others and delivers quite a wallop, especially at the end.
Love Star Wars or hate it, everone has still seen the original and knows Darth Vader and this, after all, is his story. The narrative just grabs you, even with some bumps and what th-'s along the way. The end is like watching the Bible, DeMille style. Riveting. There wasn't a dry eye in the place.
At the end, I stood up and said, 'I can't wait to see what happens next.'
I'd put EMPIRE first, STAR WARS second (for its significance), SITH a very close third and then a big drop to JEDI, and finally II and I.
This new one really redeems Lucas in most ways -- the story makes sense (far more than the clone war nonsense; I still don't know who was fighting who there), and the CGI is particularly magnificent throughout.
The acting remains inert. Although the actors perform somewhat better than the recent I and II, it is still sometimes wooden and hollow. For all that, the sheer epic of it all carries the viewer through.
It's too bad JEDI couldn't have been stronger to end the saga, but the way it all loops together now is quite remarkable.
Just about everyone in the screening liked it, especially in a communal we've-all-been-in-this-universe-like-it-or-not-for-30-years-and-this-is-how-it-ends. You leave not really wanting more, but feeling the story is now complete.
Anyhow, everyone left not raving about the filmmaking as much as they were satisfied by the experience. I heard the word 'satisfied' a lot.
I think it will do very well and have very good word-of-mouth.
ManaByte said:Here's a new link:
http://s11.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=0Z1DOWV7Q2TZV067UV6K7G90BD
BEST TRAILER EVER! AMAZING.
Ristamar said:All the prequels had serious advertsement whoring. The run of the special edition of the OT in the late 90's was far crazier than any of this, though, in terms of advertisement and promotional saturation. Walking into a grocery store almost felt like a visit to a Star Wars convention.
"The saga is complete. What George Lucas began in 1977 as a little movie that took the box office by storm, he has completed in 2005 with the most heralded motion picture of the year. With the arrival of Revenge of the Sith, Lucas places the missing piece of the six-film arc that tells of the rise, fall, and redemption of Darth Vader. It's a rousing and tragic sendoff to a beloved franchise, and the best installment in the Star Wars series since 1980's The Empire Strikes Back. If this is to be the last big-screen installment of the space opera, Revenge of the Sith ushers things out on a high note. Those who have disparaged the previous two prequels (1999's The Phantom Menace and 2002's Attack of the Clones) will find few things to complain about this time around. Lucas has delivered the film that Star Wars fans have been yearning for."