• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

OFFICIAL Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Matrix

LeBron loves his girlfriend. There is no other woman in the world he’d rather have. The problem is, Dwyane’s not a woman.
God that looks sweet :D

Buying my tickets tonight :)
 

LukeSmith

Member
Just got back from Revenge of the Sith, I'm going to put all my thoughts below in Spoiler Tags, but I am not going to spoil ANY singular detail from the film, if people want more details or questions I will answer them, but I want people to experience this movie's detail on it's own merit.
I will preface it with this:
I love Star Wars, old and new. But, I see the flaws in the first two (Ep. 1/2) as flaws and don't apologize for those mistakes. Jar Jar was unnecessary and the love story of Episode II was forced and ill-written.

Episode III triumphs in its depiction of the final fall of Anakin Skywalker. From the degeneration of his relationships with everyone around him, to the growth of a new relationship with his new master.

Part of what makes this fall so tragic is the care Lucas puts in to establishing his relationships with other characters. Since Episode II, a pretty real relationship has formed between Obi Wan and Anakin, it makes the line where Obi Wan tells Luke in ANH "And he was a good friend" (or some such line) ring even more true.

Further, it shows from Obi Wan's perspective that he thinks of Anakin Skywalker and Darth Vader as two very different entities, it is painfully clear in Episode III that Obi Wan considers Anakin a friend first and an apprentice second, so when he tells Luke that a "pupil of mine, Darth Vader betrayed and murdered your father" it is actually the truth, because there is a deliberate point in the movie where you will know it is the last time these two will speak as friends. All of that being kept in mind, the tragedy of Obi Wan and Anakin rings very true.

There was one specific line between Anakin and Padme that made me go "I wish they'd ended this scene 4 seconds ago" but the way the two's interactions are shot (extremely close and Anakin often half shadowed) actually allows these two actors to work. They look more comfortable in front of a green screen and Hayden Christensen can act (see: Shattered Glass) and everything between them plays out very well this time. Episode II was awkward at times like a 13 year old girl trying to give her eighth grade boyfriend a hand-job -- it still got the job done, but it was pretty rough. Episode III is significantly more accomplished in this respect.

The relationship between Chancellor Palpatine and Anakin is well developed. Anakin's courtship and eventual seduction to the Dark Side feels like the natural progression (or digression, if you prefer) of his character. The trap is set and he finds his way into it, but not without a few surprises along hte way.

The lightsaber battles are superb and the space battles in the movie equally so. The movie has less of the plastic-y feeling of the second film. The wookies look good, and any old characters (as in OT characters) who appear throughout the film are used perfectly, rather than as novelty items or small tidbits for trainspotters. (The Peter Cushing-a-like is so subtle, and so perfect)

I loved it, it was everything I wanted it to be and I was pretty concerned about the film, how Lucas could handle the depth and darkness of the story without sugar coating it. He didn't.

I saw a film projected version, not a digital one, so anything extra in the digital version I did not see.
 

borghe

Loves the Greater Toronto Area
grats scoot.. sounds like everything I am hoping for.. I already know the story, so your description is even that much sweeter by being vague about specifics but going into how and why everything works.. thanks!

the only other thing I want to know is about the digital version, so hopefully someone sees that and chimes in in this thread.
 

LukeSmith

Member
borghe said:
grats scoot.. sounds like everything I am hoping for.. I already know the story, so your description is even that much sweeter by being vague about specifics but going into how and why everything works.. thanks!

the only other thing I want to know is about the digital version, so hopefully someone sees that and chimes in in this thread.

Yeah dude, I wouldn't come in here and spoil specifics. Because to me, the movie isn't about the details this time. It's about this tremendous fall, something Lucas has built up to (awkwardly and at times, poorly) but fully realizes here.


The relationships in Episode III are genuine, something Lucas couldn't really pull off in TPM or AoTC. They felt wooden, or plastic-y, like several of those other films' set pieces. Here, everything coalesces, only to be defamed by both new relationships and the swift strike of a lightsaber.
 

AniHawk

Member
Scoot said:
Yeah dude, I wouldn't come in here and spoil specifics. Because to me, the movie isn't about the details this time. It's about this tremendous fall, something Lucas has built up to (awkwardly and at times, poorly) but fully realizes here.


The relationships in Episode III are genuine, something Lucas couldn't really pull off in TPM or AoTC. They felt wooden, or plastic-y, like several of those other films' set pieces. Here, everything coalesces, only to be defamed by both new relationships and the swift strike of a lightsaber.

Thanks for your impressions of the movie. Now, if you had to rank them :), where would it fall?
 

mattx5

Member
All the reviews have been excellent, but they all mention the lack of that scene, and personally, George has really made me steamed with this exclusion.

No George. You can't mention a character who died two movies ago in passing, especially not when it turns out that he plays a major role and holds a revelation related to the nature of the force.

When people hear Yoda tell Obi-Wan that he chatted with Qui Gon, the audience is going to say -

"Who? Oh, that dude who died in TPM? When did Yoda talk to him? Why didn't they show it? He taught Yoda how to live on after death? How? Why didn't they show that? How did Qui-Gon learn this?"

Fuck George, it's not even the gap in the force ghost theory that dissapoints me, it's your fucking ridiculous editing choice. You can't introduce a major concept like that out of the blue. We need to see it, not be told it in passing. You might as well have not mentioned Qui Gon at all. Of course, all the SW whizzes will blindly accept this decision because they already know everything there is to know about the Star Wars universe, and anything that isn't in the film, they just magically imagine it in their heads.

I'm a huge SW fan, but when I see my fellow SW nerds throwing the concept of proper editing and writing out the window, it makes me feel embarassed.


In any case, I'm still seeing the film opening night, and am still highly anticipating it (reviews have been very positive so far).
 

LukeSmith

Member
AniHawk said:
Thanks for your impressions of the movie. Now, if you had to rank them :), where would it fall?

I said to a friend, in order for (after one viewing) that in order for Batman Begins to be better than Revenge of the Sith, Batman Begins has to be better than Return of the Jedi, because after one viewing Sith > RoTJ.

RotJ has the Ewok fluff and the pace is off (the film is a touch too long, IMO). Sith is on par with the Original Trilogy after one viewing to me. Admittedly, though, it's pretty hard to separate right now, how good it was. When I see a great movie, and leave the theater still thinking about it, it takes more time than I've given it to properly process it vs. other films.

Empire is my favorite because of its Darkness. ANH, I love because of the optimism. Sith, I love because of it's use (finally, George, finally) of dramatic irony. The dramatic irony that takes in to account the future (OT) of Anakin Skywalker and his past, among other things Lucas did with the script (the way certain events play out, or are crosscut -- I will not be mentioning specifics here, obviously). This is an extremely complete Star Wars film, to me and one that I will watch regularly on DVD.

Ranking the original trilogy is so hard anyway, because in conversation Empire is my favorite but I can watch ANH and go, "god this is the best one" and then even the final fight in RotJ (which Sith's fight, does not ultimately surpass, despite the emotional gravitas of best friends fighting) makes me raise and eyebrow and think "this one, despite it's flaws could be the best of the bunch." What I'm himming and hawing at, is that it's almost impossible for me to rank the original trilogy -- but I do think that RotS, more than the other prequel films, undoubtedly has deserved it's place beside the original trilogy.

On any given day, any one of those movies can be my favorite. Sith after one viewing, should stand along side them.
 

LukeSmith

Member
mattx5 said:
All the reviews have been excellent, but they all mention the lack of that scene, and personally, George has really made me steamed with this exclusion.

No George. You can't mention a character who died two movies ago in passing, especially not when it turns out that he plays a major role and holds a revelation related to the nature of the force.

When people hear Yoda tell Obi-Wan that he chatted with Qui Gon, the audience is going to say -

"Who? Oh, that dude who died in TPM? When did Yoda talk to him? Why didn't they show it? He taught Yoda how to live on after death? How? Why didn't they show that? How did Qui-Gon learn this?"

Fuck George, it's not even the gap in the force ghost theory that dissapoints me, it's your fucking ridiculous editing choice. You can't introduce a major concept like that out of the blue. We need to see it, not be told it in passing. You might as well have not mentioned Qui Gon at all. Of course, all the SW whizzes will blindly accept this decision because they already know everything there is to know about the Star Wars universe, and anything that isn't in the film, they just magically imagine it in their heads.

I'm a huge SW fan, but when I see my fellow SW nerds throwing the concept of proper editing and writing out the window, it makes me feel embarassed.


In any case, I'm still seeing the film opening night, and am still highly anticipating it (reviews have been very positive so far).

film related spoiler within, click at risk, plz.

The unveiling of this is kind of expected. I've been under the impression that Qui Gon and Yoda have been talking for some time, hence why Yoda is often studying in his private room (with all of the shades) it is during one of these meditations in AotC where we hear Qui Gon's voice. Yoda has been saving this for a time when he would need it, and in the film he gives Obi Wan his final assignment, it is not to train Luke someday, but rather to prepare himself for becoming one with the force.
 

ManaByte

Member
borghe said:
do we hear qui-gonn speak in the movie?

No,
because the rumor is that Liam refused to do it. People said that was BS but since he isn't in the movie it may be true.
 

mrkgoo

Member
ManaByte said:
No,
because the rumor is that Liam refused to do it. People said that was BS but since he isn't in the movie it may be true.

I don't see how some people can be that petty - why would he refuse? Does he hate George and/or Star Wars THAT much? Surely, it's just another (small) part of his job. Could it be he's cut because the scene is redundant, giving the discussion Obiwan has with Yoda? Afterall, a well written (uh-oh)exchange between major characters of the saga is probably more relevant. Obi-wans shock at Yodas commune could be enough of 'shock' to make it a surprise enough. I don't think the actual exchange between Yoda and QJ to be as important as many seem to think.
 

Tabris

Member
Oh my god.

Those 2 tv spots and that 1 trailer are some of the most goose-bumping trailers/spots I've ever seen!
 

borghe

Loves the Greater Toronto Area
I finally got around to watching that trailer (no sound at work)

to be honest, I know the story, have seen every clip, seen every screenshot.....

and yet THAT is what I have been waiting almost 30 years for.... I can't believe after how spoiled I am THAT trailer could give me those kindof goosebumps. I just became completely reinvigorated for this movie, and given how much I have taken in on it, that is saying a lot.

this movie is going to rule over all star wars fans.
 

Tabris

Member
You gotta admit, no matter what anyone thinks of Hayden's acting, he's SO got the looks down in this movie!
 

ManaByte

Member
Tabris said:
You gotta admit, no matter what anyone thinks of Hayden's acting, he's SO got the looks down in this movie!

His
"What have I done" in ROTS after assisting with the death of...someone...is excellent.
 
Question regarding Qui Gon Jinn
Okay, if noone knew how to become a ghost-type being after death except for Qui-Gon who told Yoda, who then told Obi-Wan, how did Anikan learn how to do it at the end of Return of the Jedi? Will that be explained as well in the movie?
 

ManaByte

Member
cvkpaladin said:
Question regarding Qui Gon Jinn
Okay, if noone knew how to become a ghost-type being after death except for Qui-Gon who told Yoda, who then told Obi-Wan, how did Anikan learn how to do it at the end of Return of the Jedi? Will that be explained as well in the movie?

I don't think it's in the movie, but apparently it's Anakin's "reward" for fulfilling the prohecy and bringing balance to the Force.
 

Tabris

Member
Not reading it :p

I think I may have figured out who Grevious is based on the trailers. Total guess here.

I think he's Maul.
 

ManaByte

Member
Tabris said:
Not reading it :p

I think I may have figured out who Grevious is based on the trailers. Total guess here.

I think he's Maul.

Hahah. No.

Grievous is an all-new character. His origin is in the SW Visionaries book.
 
Manabyte said:
I don't think it's in the movie, but apparently it's Anakin's "reward" for fulfilling the prohecy and bringing balance to the Force.

Ah, okay. I can live with that theory.
And on further note, this movie is so gonna rock. I've already been spoiled by most of the stuff that happens within it, but I can't stop watching the damn trailers over and over again. I think I might be a Star Wars nerd. :lol
 

Tabris

Member
Oh, well I think it was a good guess. :p

His eyes look sith-ish, he doesn't have any human legs, just a biological body and mechanical limbs. I dunno, it just matchs.

I think it would have been pretty cool, but I guess it would kinda step on the whole Vader thing.
 

mattx5

Member
Regarding
Qui Gon,

His talk with Yoda revolved heavily around the concepts of love, compassion and how they tie into the living force, and they would have factored into Anakin's redemption and ability to join with the force. Too bad they cut it!
 

ManaByte

Member
Dead said:
I can't believe a Wookie does the Tarzan yell :lol

Sounds like someone never saw Return of the Jedi.

Those reviews read like big whining babies crying about the prequels and Lucas as a whole.
 

ManaByte

Member
Hollywood Reporter's Review:

The final episode of George Lucas' cinematic epic "Star Wars" ends the six-movie series on such a high note that one feels like yelling out, "Rewind!" Yes, rewind through more than 13 hours of bravery, treachery, new worlds, odd creatures and human frailty. The first two episodes of Lucas' second trilogy -- "The Phantom Menace" (1999) and "Attack of the Clones" (2002) -- caused more than a few fans of the original trilogy to wonder whether this prequel was worth it. The answer is a qualified yes. It did take a lot of weighty exposition, stiffly played scenes and less-than-magical creatures to get to "Star Wars: Episode III -- Revenge of the Sith." But what a ride Lucas and Co. have in store!

Variety's Review:

The Force returns with most of its original power regained. Concluding entry in George Lucas' second three-pack of space epics teems with action, drama and spectacle, and even supplies the odd surge of emotion, as young Anakin Skywalker goes over to the Dark Side and the stage is set for the generation of stories launched by the original "Star Wars" 28 years ago. Whatever one thought of the previous two installments, this dynamic picture irons out most of the problems, and emerges as the best in the overall series since "The Empire Strikes Back."

Entertaining from start to finish and even enthralling at times, "Sith" has some acting worth writing home about, specifically McDiarmid's dominant turn as the mastermind of the evil empire. McGregor remains a steady presence, and both Portman and Christensen have loosened up since "Clones" to acceptable, if hardly inspired, levels. Expressiveness of the digitally animated Yoda, voiced as always by Frank Oz, is amazing.
 
Birbo said:
Do you know everything that happens in the movie? And if so, does that decrease your anticipation at all for it? Just wondering.
for me, I knew every single thing that happened in The Phantom Menace before I saw it and the movie was awesome. Then I went to the theater.
 

ManaByte

Member
Couple more reviews linked on Rotten Tomatoes. Both positive:

http://www.cinemablend.com/review.php?id=965

Revenge of the Sith isn’t just a great Star Wars movie, it’s a flat out great film. Yes it’s technically proficient and yes it’s visually beautiful. Those things are a given. What hasn’t been is how solidly the film is constructed. Revenge of the Sith is a powerful, big budget experience. Yet it is the way that it fits so wonderfully into the existing Star Wars mythos that best sells it, the way it nestles so nicely into 1977’s Episode IV: A New Hope that makes it special. The real beauty is that you could easily toss out the previous two awkward attempts, watch only this in sequence with the original films, and come out completely satisfied. Attack of the Clones and The Phantom Menace are best forgotten. Lucas’s real miscalculation was in not making this movie right from the start. He tried to stretch the story when all we needed was Vader’s rise in its purest form. Star Wars fans have finally been rewarded for their patience. This is it, don’t miss out.

http://www.mixedreviews.net/maindishes/2005/revengeofthesith/revengeofthesith.shtml

While it's safe to say that STAR WARS, EPISODE III: REVENGE OF THE SITH will not be in competition for the Best Film Oscar next year, the story might be different if there were a category for Most Improved. For surely under that criteria, it would win in a walk. Its two predecessors in the Star Wars canon -- the dreary and dour Phantom Menace and the incoherent Attack of the Clones -- not only disappointed fans and confused casual audiences, but also sullied memories of the original 1970's trilogy, diluting the saga of the Skywalker clan and their imaginative universe. For many, the newest efforts by George Lucas can still be summed up in one phrase: Jar Jar Binks.

Which will make the experience of the final film in the series, REVENGE OF THE SITH, an unexpectedly sweet pleasure. A dark and gripping slice of space opera, it successfully avoids the pitfalls of its predecessors with a dense but cohesive narrative, strong character development, and a grand, epic struggle between the forces of good and evil. The Star Wars-ian mythology is expanded in careful detail, with new additions to the legends as it comes to its conclusion. Perhaps most importantly, director/screenwriter Lucas finds surprising and satisfying ways to connect this generation's characters (Anakin, Padme, et al) to the next (Luke, Leia), even as the modern triptych completes the circle back to where it all began: long, long ago in a galaxy far, far away.

Lucas' screenplay is his strongest in years, and even contains a few barely-concealed critiques of the Bush Administration and the Iraq War. The commentaries on democracy are offered in direct counterpoint to a government that is clearly overstepping its bounds, and the parallels are obvious to anyone looking for them. While Bush might not be an evil emperor (yet), it's not that far a trip from Senator Palpatine to Tom DeLay.

Its contemporary resonance, however, is subtle, and never gets in the way of the entertaining journey. REVENGE OF THE SITH may not be the series' best (that title still goes to Empire), but it can comfortably sit in a place of privilege among Lucas' six efforts. In the end, its greatest accomplishment may be to nullify the weaknesses of other, lesser installments. The lingering memories of Jar-Jar are forgiven (almost); George Lucas has shown us how to dream of galaxies again...and how fun he can make an afternoon at the movies.
 

Iceman

Member
"Lucas' screenplay is his strongest in years, and even contains a few barely-concealed critiques of the Bush Administration and the Iraq War. The commentaries on democracy are offered in direct counterpoint to a government that is clearly overstepping its bounds, and the parallels are obvious to anyone looking for them. While Bush might not be an evil emperor (yet), it's not that far a trip from Senator Palpatine to Tom DeLay."

Ugh.. this really killed the hype for me now. Why did I have to read this?? I know Ep. III involves zero modern political commentary but this little snippet has already tainted the experience for me. I don't want to watch this thing thinking about modern political overtones. (All of the sudden Lucas becomes a brilliant satirist screenwriter that can deftly weave a multitude of complex themes into a scifi action space opera? c'mon.) I gotta let this distaste wash out of my mind before I see the movie.
 
Iceman ignore it. I think it is more of a coincidence than anything. I mean I can't imagine any other way the Emperor would take over. It only seems natural.
 

Tortfeasor

Member
I decided to finally go ahead and buy tickets yesterday, and went online looking.

The theater of preference (AMC Downtown Chicago - the best theater in Chicago) had it showing on 18 screens at 12:01am on the 16th/17th but they were all sold out. I called the theater and spoke with someone who told me that some star wars clubs bought out all of the tickets for a majority of the theaters, including thier beiggest screen that has the digital display.

Panicing I started thinking about just seeing it during Thursday afternoon or just going to a different theater, but I remembered that a friend of a friend was into sci-fi conventions and such and gave her a call. It turns out that she is a part of one of the groups that bought out all of the tickets and I was able to snag 3 for the big theater at the 12:01am showing.

Life is now good.
 

ManaByte

Member
Tortfeasor said:
The theater of preference (AMC Downtown Chicago - the best theater in Chicago) had it showing on 18 screens at 12:01am on the 16th/17th but they were all sold out. I called the theater and spoke with someone who told me that some star wars clubs bought out all of the tickets for a majority of the theaters, including thier beiggest screen that has the digital display.

We (the San Deigo Star Wars group) bought out the digital screen at the big Edwards down here. They weren't originally going to get a digital print, but we were able to convince them to ask LFL for one. It's going to be fun on the 18th as apparently some SDSU students are super pissed over it and I can't wait to see them dragged out of the theater by the cops because that manager doesn't take shit from anyone.

At ROTK they had a row of seats roped off for the OneRing.net people who were helping with the line. Well, when everyone got in the theater this tall fucktard decided he wanted to sit in that row and no one was going to stop him. So he started pushing people and pulling them out of their seat. The manager called the cops and had him dragged out of the theater.

I don't know how the people in Chicago are working it, but those screens they bought out may be because they will be re-selling the tickets (for like $10) and giving the money to charity so you may want to check around and see. I know we have like 150 tickets for one theater at the Edwards that will be for charity that night.
 

DrForester

Kills Photobucket
I had already heard the whole "one with the force to become the "flash blue Thing"

What i don't get is this. When Ep. 1 came out the "reasoning" why Qui Gon didn't disapear when killed was becasue he wasn't one with the force. If he was, then why didn't his body disapear.
 

DrForester

Kills Photobucket
Iceman said:
"Lucas' screenplay is his strongest in years, and even contains a few barely-concealed critiques of the Bush Administration and the Iraq War. The commentaries on democracy are offered in direct counterpoint to a government that is clearly overstepping its bounds, and the parallels are obvious to anyone looking for them. While Bush might not be an evil emperor (yet), it's not that far a trip from Senator Palpatine to Tom DeLay."


Wait...

So does this mean Sadam Husein is Count Douku?

Bush Sr. Emperor?

Bush Jr. Anakin?
 

ManaByte

Member
David Colton of USA Today posted this to a ezboard, no one knows if he'll be reviewing it in the paper or not though:
Saw STAR WARS III this afternoon at a press screening in D.C.

We can't, and won't, reveal anything, natch, but forget that stuff about this being too violent for kids. It's fine...There's dark psychobabble and violence, yes, but the kids will be so taken by it that there will be no problem at all.

This is BY FAR the best of the recent three -- not hard to accomplish -- but more, this SW really delivers. It is totally satisfying, the opening battle is just plain awesome (you feel like you're falling into the screen), the Haydensen (sp?), guy playing Anakin Skywalker is still totally dreadful and Yoda is fantastic. The film never gets cute like the others and delivers quite a wallop, especially at the end.

Love Star Wars or hate it, everone has still seen the original and knows Darth Vader and this, after all, is his story. The narrative just grabs you, even with some bumps and what th-'s along the way. The end is like watching the Bible, DeMille style. Riveting. There wasn't a dry eye in the place.

At the end, I stood up and said, 'I can't wait to see what happens next.'

I'd put EMPIRE first, STAR WARS second (for its significance), SITH a very close third and then a big drop to JEDI, and finally II and I.

This new one really redeems Lucas in most ways -- the story makes sense (far more than the clone war nonsense; I still don't know who was fighting who there), and the CGI is particularly magnificent throughout.

The acting remains inert. Although the actors perform somewhat better than the recent I and II, it is still sometimes wooden and hollow. For all that, the sheer epic of it all carries the viewer through.

It's too bad JEDI couldn't have been stronger to end the saga, but the way it all loops together now is quite remarkable.

Just about everyone in the screening liked it, especially in a communal we've-all-been-in-this-universe-like-it-or-not-for-30-years-and-this-is-how-it-ends. You leave not really wanting more, but feeling the story is now complete.

Anyhow, everyone left not raving about the filmmaking as much as they were satisfied by the experience. I heard the word 'satisfied' a lot.

I think it will do very well and have very good word-of-mouth.
 

J2 Cool

Member
When was the last time a movie was advertised like this? Somehow the advertisement whoring just feels right for a major blockbuster. 7/11 and Darth Vader. Yoda and Pepsi.. I love it. And a full 2 weeks before release. Wow. This opening will be massive. People I've talked to who don't even care too much for star wars have even said "Yeah, I didn't like the first ones that much but this next one looks awesome".
 

Ristamar

Member
All the prequels had serious advertsement whoring. The run of the special edition of the OT in the late 90's was far crazier than any of this, though, in terms of advertisement and promotional saturation. Walking into a grocery store almost felt like a visit to a Star Wars convention.
 

ManaByte

Member
Ristamar said:
All the prequels had serious advertsement whoring. The run of the special edition of the OT in the late 90's was far crazier than any of this, though, in terms of advertisement and promotional saturation. Walking into a grocery store almost felt like a visit to a Star Wars convention.

Actually TPM had something like 10x the marketing than the Special Editions. AOTC was the lowest amount of marketing actually.

At the Hyperspace Comic Con breakfast, the head of Lucas Licensing said that with Phantom they had too much, and with Clones they had too little. Their target for Sith was somewhere in the middle.
 

ManaByte

Member
James Berardinelli will have his full review up on Sunday, but he posted the first paragraph tonight:

"The saga is complete. What George Lucas began in 1977 as a little movie that took the box office by storm, he has completed in 2005 with the most heralded motion picture of the year. With the arrival of Revenge of the Sith, Lucas places the missing piece of the six-film arc that tells of the rise, fall, and redemption of Darth Vader. It's a rousing and tragic sendoff to a beloved franchise, and the best installment in the Star Wars series since 1980's The Empire Strikes Back. If this is to be the last big-screen installment of the space opera, Revenge of the Sith ushers things out on a high note. Those who have disparaged the previous two prequels (1999's The Phantom Menace and 2002's Attack of the Clones) will find few things to complain about this time around. Lucas has delivered the film that Star Wars fans have been yearning for."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom