• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

|OT| French Presidential Elect 2017 - La France est toujours insoumise; Le Pen loses

GAF Decides


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
lol, over in the UK the Daily Heil didn't even bother to mention the election on the front page:

C_QQL-jXkAEOQbs.jpg

For reference, this was their reaction two weeks ago when Le Pen made it to the second round:


Same with The Scum by the way. So much delicious salt.
 

oti

Banned
lol, over in the UK the Daily Heil didn't even bother to mention the election on the front page:



For reference, this was their reaction two weeks ago when Le Pen made it to the second round:



Same with The Scum by the way. So much delicious salt.

hue hue hue
 

Magni

Member
It doesn't work comparing a tiny country like France to a country like the US which is the size of a continent.

Percentage wise Hillary got about 5% more. 62.9 million vs 65.8 million. It's essentially split given the amount of people, close to 130 million voters

Macron 20.4 million vs Le Pen 10.6 million

A US vote in comparison would be 85 million vs 45 million. No amount of EC would make the 45 million candidate win office. Lets face it, Trump Clinton was very close and he won the game set out before hand. Maybe change the rules next time but that would mean California skewing the results against so many states hence the EC.

So no France aren't lucky to not have a electoral collage (aimed at previous posters), wouldn't help Le Pen anyway, it was a landslide, not a close run thing like the US.

If France had an EC and only 1 round of voting like the US, then MLP would have won (based on the first round results).

Of course, the parties involved would probably have been drastically different had that been the system in place.
 

FyreWulff

Member
It doesn't work comparing a tiny country like France to a country like the US which is the size of a continent.

Percentage wise Hillary got about 5% more. 62.9 million vs 65.8 million. It's essentially split given the amount of people, close to 130 million voters

Macron 20.4 million vs Le Pen 10.6 million

A US vote in comparison would be 85 million vs 45 million. No amount of EC would make the 45 million candidate win office. Lets face it, Trump Clinton was very close and he won the game set out before hand. Maybe change the rules next time but that would mean California skewing the results against so many states hence the EC.

So no France aren't lucky to not have a electoral collage (aimed at previous posters), wouldn't help Le Pen anyway, it was a landslide, not a close run thing like the US.


You can win the US PV vote by 80 million margin and still lose the EC. You only need to win 50.01% votes of each state to get all the EV votes.

I don't see the relevance of voting methods to land area.
 
If France had an EC and only 1 round of voting like the US, then MLP would have won (based on the first round results).

Of course, the parties involved would probably have been drastically different had that been the system in place.

But you have a primaries process. Wouldn't that be the equivalent of what France does?
 
So, are there any other upcoming European elections where the far right are a potential threat? Or was this pretty much it for the time being?
 

mo60

Member
Yeah FN is likely to try and push the old parties out to become the defacto opposition. Remains to be seen what will happen with the left.

The UK is doomed with Corbyn at the head of Labour, it will soon be a one-party state.

The LR is going nowhere especially on the legislative level. The socialist party is in danger of collapsing now.
 
So, are there any other upcoming European elections where the far right are a potential threat? Or was this pretty much it for the time being?

Italy, Belgium and Austria next year. Hungary is holding a parliamentary election next year as well, but there the far right are already in power. Those are the 4 I would be the most concerned about.
In most other countries (Denmark, Norway, Germany, etc.), the far right doesn't go higher than to ~15%, if it even exists.
 
You can win the US PV vote by 80 million margin and still lose the EC. You only need to win 50.01% votes of each state to get all the EV votes.

I don't see the relevance of voting methods to land area.

It would take an extraordinarily weird electoral map, or truly absurd differences between states (like various states breaking 90:10 for one candidate or the other) for a candidate to lose the popular vote 2:1 yet still win the EC.

More to the point, a candidate winning the EC like that would immediately trigger the greatest governmental crisis this country has seen since the 19th century. Hillary's "loss" has only barely been tolerated for the sake of stability of government (which, frankly, Trump is tearing up anyway) but even a somewhat larger gap between candidates, another few million votes and perhaps 5-6 percentage points separating them, would touch off a constitutional crisis and debate of historic proportions. A candidate being crushed by a margin of 30% yet still winning the EC would result in secession discussion in various state legislatures that very night.

The EC is stupid and horrifically antiquated and we should abolish it, but this is why it's been tolerated up to this point; generally, a dude who wins the PV will still win the EC. We say it's been otherwise "five times", but between 1888 and 2000 the two votes matched. A major PV win while still losing the EC would be very, very weird.
 
33.93% of the vote actually. She failed to even break 35% of the vote.That is how bad she did.

34% still is a third of the country voting for a racist right wing nutter and Holocaust denier. I think that's what he considers scary.

The Italian election could provide new trouble, although FSM is not far right.

I would consider FSM to be very much on the right all things considered. Obviously not as extreme as LN, but still. At the very least they have some very right wing points and are Eurosceptics.
 

G.ZZZ

Member
Italy, Belgium and Austria next year. Hungary is holding a parliamentary election next year as well, but there the far right are already in power. Those are the 4 I would be the most concerned about.
In most other countries (Denmark, Norway, Germany, etc.), the far right doesn't go higher than to ~15%, if it even exists.

Italy doesn't risk a far right government. Northern league is at 12-15% iirc.

The 5 star movement is populist but not really far right honestly. They're whatever they need to be , and also, without making alliances they're not gonna get in power.

The most likely scenario is still a large coalition of the center left and the right.
 

Mac_Lane

Member
Putin calls on France to "overcome mutual mistrust" in wake of Macron victory

Russian President Vladimir Putin congratulated Macron on his victory, the Interfax news agency is reporting.

Putin has told the new president that Russia is ready for constructive work on bilateral and global issues.

Putin urged Macron to ‘overcome mutual distrust’ and ‘join forces,’ the Kremlin announced.

Lol, the guy has no shame.
 
Italy doesn't risk a far right government. Northern league is at 12-15% iirc.

The 5 star movement is populist but not really far right honestly. They're whatever they need to be , and also, without making alliances they're not gonna get in power.

The most likely scenario is still a large coalition of the center left and the right.

I edited into another post of mine.
FSM is right for sure, even if not far, but its euroscepticism certainly is a concerning position.

I do hope that the Democrats are going to be strong enough to force them into a coalition.

Plus, Italy is one of the biggest powers in Europe and worldwide, so it should be an election to keep an eye on generally anyway.

As for the others: Belgium's Vlaams Belang has been wavering up and down very much. While they're below 10% currently, they could do well in the municipal election next year and the general election 2019.
Austria and Hungary are the only ones where there's a real risk of a right wing government forming, though at least in Austria, it would have to be a coalition.
 

PieterJan

Neo Member
Belgium next year is only on the local municipality and provincial level, so nothing really important countrywise or europewise ... And although the NVA is a rightwing party, they are not the same threat as the FN. They pose a threat towards immigration, are hardline on social security (as far as it can be a threat in a European welfare state) and want to dismantle Belgium. They do not want to leave Europe and their role in the government (because they are already in it) has made them more sensitive to the fiscal reality. I don't see the real extreme right party VB (Vlaams Belang) getting more than 10 % in Flanders, which means even less in Belgium as a whole.
 
It's still too high.

True, but you have to understand that it's not saying that 30% of the population are Holocaust denying racists. Many are really living in economically depressed areas and are voting out of desperation for change. Or there are people who pine for "the good old days" and see the EU and globalisation as a dillution of French culture.
 

Magni

Member
With a quarter of the country abstaining. So that lowers the percentage even more.

According to the Ministry of the Interior, she got 22.38% of registered voters. It's still too high, but it's not like a third of all French people voted for her. When you add in minors and people who aren't registered, it's closer to a sixth, half that initial number. Once again, still too high!
 

Italy, Belgium and Austria next year. Hungary is holding a parliamentary election next year as well, but there the far right are already in power. Those are the 4 I would be the most concerned about.
In most other countries (Denmark, Norway, Germany, etc.), the far right doesn't go higher than to ~15%, if it even exists.

The Italian election could provide new trouble, although M5S is not far right.

Thanks. So, are any of those candidates/parties on the same level as what we saw with Trump and Le Pen in terms of just overt racism. And in Trump's case, sexism and anti-science. At least in the US, Le Pen seemed to be the one far right candidate that really had the media worried. Especially with her intention to leave the EU and NATO.

Also, what about Sweden? I know the right in the US seemed to take interest in that country after Trump's idiotic "last night in Sweden" comment. With lots of the usual right wing bloggers pushing scare stories of mass rapes happening by immigrants there. Is there any far right concern there?
 

Antagon

Member
With a quarter of the country abstaining. So that lowers the percentage even more.

Yeah, she really didn't get 35% of the vote. To put it in perspective: 11 million people abstained, 10 million voted for Le Pen and 2 million voted blanco.

Still 10 million too high, but not as bad as it might seem.
 
Belgium next year is only on the local municipality and provincial level, so nothing really important countrywise or europewise

It's a good indicator for how the general election the following year might go, though.

... And although the NVA is a rightwing party, they are not the same threat as the FN. They pose a threat towards immigration, are hardline on social security (as far as it can be a threat in a European welfare state) and want to dismantle Belgium. They do not want to leave Europe and their role in the government (because they are already in it) has made them more sensitive to the fiscal reality. I don't see the real extreme right party VB (Vlaams Belang) getting more than 10 % in Flanders, which means even less in Belgium as a whole.

Fair enough. I'm not extremely familiar with Belgian politics, I just know that Vlaams Belang has been going up and down in popularity in the last 15 years. Do the polls show that they are going to get no more than 10% in Flanders?
 
Italy, Belgium and Austria next year. Hungary is holding a parliamentary election next year as well, but there the far right are already in power. Those are the 4 I would be the most concerned about.
In most other countries (Denmark, Norway, Germany, etc.), the far right doesn't go higher than to ~15%, if it even exists.

The far right is the biggest party in Denmark, 2nd biggest in sweden
 
Thanks. So, are any of those candidates/parties on the same level as what we saw with Trump and Le Pen in terms of just overt racism. And in Trump's case, sexism and anti-science. At least in the US, Le Pen seemed to be the one far right candidate that really had the media worried. Especially with her intention to leave the EU and NATO.

Also, what about Sweden? I know the right in the US seemed to take interest in that country after Trump's idiotic "last night in Sweden" comment. With lots of the usual right wing bloggers pushing scare stories of mass rapes happening by immigrants there. Is there any far right concern there?

Hungary's Viktor Orban is a pocket dictator, he's mostly kept in check by the EU, but there's no real risk for Hungary dropping out of the EU.
Austria's HC Strache is pretty much on a similar level as Le Pen and Trump. His party has attempted to lift the laws that ban Holocaust relativism, and it also has indicated a desire to hold a referendum in regards to a possible Auxit.

That said, both countries are small and not particularly significant globally.

I totally forgot Sweden is holding a general election next year as well. Their right wing party, the Sweden Democrats, are at around 12% in the current parliament, but have been polling to around 20% recently if I know correctly.

The far right is the biggest party in Denmark, 2nd biggest in sweden

I thought the Social Democrats were the biggest party in Denmark? Also yeah, I misread the table (the 12% I saw was their initial standing before the 2015 election), the DPP is at ~20% as well. Apologies.
 

Koren

Member
If France had an EC and only 1 round of voting like the US
It doesn't make that much sense, if there was only 1 turn (and an EC, but I don't see why we would use an EC at all), people may have vote really differently, and the whole 10-20 candidates system wouldn't suit this kind of election...
 

FyreWulff

Member
It would take an extraordinarily weird electoral map, or truly absurd differences between states (like various states breaking 90:10 for one candidate or the other) for a candidate to lose the popular vote 2:1 yet still win the EC.

More to the point, a candidate winning the EC like that would immediately trigger the greatest governmental crisis this country has seen since the 19th century. Hillary's "loss" has only barely been tolerated for the sake of stability of government (which, frankly, Trump is tearing up anyway) but even a somewhat larger gap between candidates, another few million votes and perhaps 5-6 percentage points separating them, would touch off a constitutional crisis and debate of historic proportions. A candidate being crushed by a margin of 30% yet still winning the EC would result in secession discussion in various state legislatures that very night.

The EC is stupid and horrifically antiquated and we should abolish it, but this is why it's been tolerated up to this point; generally, a dude who wins the PV will still win the EC. We say it's been otherwise "five times", but between 1888 and 2000 the two votes matched. A major PV win while still losing the EC would be very, very weird.

Yes, it's a theoretical max with the current population of registered voters. The fact that it can happen is fucking stupid, and just demonstrates how the EC distorts the will of the voters to something it's not.
 

Jasup

Member
The Italian election could provide new trouble, although M5S is not far right.

There was never any danger by AfD. Heck, they barely got 5% in a recent state election.

M5S is part of the EFDD group in the European parliament with AfD, UKIP and Sweden Democrats most notably. Although not all their policies or ideas would fall under the umbrella of far right, their international affiliations are pretty much there.
 

Kain

Member
I really don't like this Macron dude but he's still better than the fascist scum. Congrats France on the lesser evil!
 

G.ZZZ

Member
M5S is part of the EFDD group in the European parliament with AfD, UKIP and Sweden Democrats most notably. Although not all their policies or ideas would fall under the umbrella of far right, their international affiliations are pretty much there.

M5S also asked (after a vote between its costituents) to enter the ALDE party, the most liberal pro-euro party because most of their policy are "leftist" (UBI, green energy, etc...) and were refused by the ALDE costituency.
 
M5S is part of the EFDD group in the European parliament with AfD, UKIP and Sweden Democrats most notably. Although not all their policies or ideas would fall under the umbrella of far right, their international affiliations are pretty much there.

M5S also asked (after a vote between its costituents) to enter the ALDE party, the most liberal pro-euro party because most of their policy are "leftist" (UBI, green energy, etc...) and were refused by the ALDE costituency.

Yeah, M5S is a realllllly weird party that skirts between both left and right (without being centrist). That said, in regards to Europe and immigration they certainly are on the right side, and I think those 2 are among the most important topics in regards to this.

http://www.standaard.be/peiling

Latest polling in Flanders, so in terms of Belgium this is even less because there are no Belgium wide parties.

Thank you very much!
 

Oriel

Member
lol, over in the UK the Daily Heil didn't even bother to mention the election on the front page:



For reference, this was their reaction two weeks ago when Le Pen made it to the second round:



Same with The Scum by the way. So much delicious salt.

I guess voters had their say on "Frexit". The Fail really are a bunch of cunts.
 

mclem

Member
Honestly, I wonder how much Wednesday's performance hurt that normalization.
She really came across as entirely unfit to govern, in the sense that their platform is really paper thin and when push comes to shove, she can't show any substance to save her life. It's beginning to show and their only growth will either be through more discontent or through an actual political project. The Euro fumbling of the last week was an embarrassment.

Was there any form of early voting? Wonder if a proportion of votes came in prior to the debate.
 

Funky Papa

FUNK-Y-PPA-4
Thank, France. I really needed this.

Re: the Visagrad assholes.

Hungary and Poland are not getting out of the EU because despite all their posturing their leaders know fully well that they NEED the EU to remain prosper and they also understand that the alternative is getting bullied by Russia into a corner. They are playing a dangerous game, but even Orbán folds because he knows the stakes.
 

Alx

Member
Curious if there's a reason why - approximately speaking - the Spanish border is more pro-Macron than the Mediterranean and the Italian border.

It has more to do with the Mediterranean sea than the Italian or Spanish border. The shore is both a traditional land of immigration from North Africa (Marseille especially is known for its strong arab community/heritage), and a place where rich and older people settle. The tensions there are more cultural, while in the north it's more about the economy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom