I haven't heard anything about Dupont-Aignant, has he said anything yet ?
He'll say who he'll vote for this next week.
I haven't heard anything about Dupont-Aignant, has he said anything yet ?
France's interior ministry says with 20 million votes counted, Marine Le Pen has 24.38%, ahead of Emmanuel Macron on 22.19%.
I haven't heard anything about Dupont-Aignant, has he said anything yet ?
What has that to do with the welfare state?
Wait, French Guiana voted mainly for Melenchon and Le Pen? Are they voting out of the EU because they are here in south america?Not much to look at yet, but here's a live update on the count:
http://graphics.france24.com/results-first-round-french-presidential-election-2017/
Is there seriously no page that shows the current, overall result?
Big cities still yet to be counted
So where does all this "He wants to destroy the welfare state" stuff from when he is left-wing socially?
I haven't heard anything about Dupont-Aignant, has he said anything yet ?
I've heard this before, somewhere.
Chalk it up to three countries, all predominantly white, looking at how the world is becoming more interconnected and minority populations are booming. That scares them shitless into the point of voting for white nationalism because hey, they're the ones that benefit from that.
It seems like the only options are "bad" and "catastrophic."
France 24 has a live result page but nothing has really been posted yet.
Melanchon sounds like he is basically Bernie Sanders but French, right down to being wishy washy on supporting anyone who does not fully agree with his extremely specific views.If Mélenchon don't call for a Macron vote it would be certainly an earthquake for french politics. I think he is capable to do something like that, since he apparently have no issue to saying "she is right" about MLP stance during the presidential debate when he felt the need too.
If he does call for a Macron vote, it would be an earthquake for his base though. The same people who are insulting us for not having voted "useful" are now calling for abstention against fascism. Brillant.
[IG]https://media.giphy.com/media/xUA7aZLLjVzkK35KTK/giphy.gif[/IMG]
I honestly don't know, which is why I'm asking.Is it really like that? It seems here in Germany most of the people think that Macron would be a very fitting president at the moment. And even if you don't agree with his views I don't see a "bad" candidate as in "Trump"-bad.
Is it really like that? It seems here in Germany most of the people think that Macron would be a very fitting president at the moment. And even if you don't agree with his views I don't see a "bad" candidate as in "Trump"-bad.
They're using the Nolan chart's definitions. The welfare state is usually considered on the "economic" axis with taxes or whatever...left-wing socially is pro-gay/minority rights, often pro-choice, pro-free speech, pro-diversity, etc. It'd be more accurate to probably call it the "cultural" axis, I dunno.So where does all this "He wants to destroy the welfare state" stuff from when he is left-wing socially?
Rene Remond's ever expanding classifications work arguably as well with the "left-wing" I'd argue.I think truthfully Macron is probably best classified as a left-liberal; which is to say traditionally right of a social democrat or socialist, but traditionally left of right-liberals, Christian democrats, and conservatives. But it is difficult to compare any politicians across countries. I also think Macron appears further right because he is the third left-most serious candidate because Melanchon and Hamon remained in the race. Certainly in an alternate world where Macron was the PS candidate, he would be right of what was typical for the party, but he is also certainly left of every feasible LR candidate.
The complication of European domestic politics by the addition of the populist-nationalist versus cosmopolitan-EU dimension is making it harder to tell. If you had told me ten years ago that the mainstream left across Europe would generally admire Merkel as a defender of our common values, I would have laughed. And yet, here we are.
As someone who knows admittedly little about French politics, is there any outcome from this that would have been considered "good?" Fillion sounds worse than Macron and while Melanchon had a huge spike in support, it sounds like it was never likely he'd be in the top two.
It seems like the only options are "bad" and "catastrophic."
I voted for himbut let's be real. The reason why people like him in Germany is because they know he'll do everything angela tells him to do. Just like Hollande before him. He'll be a yes man. It's sad but it's true.(because I felt like I had no choice)
What I really don't get is how Lassalle could have got more votes than Poutou.
Rene Remond's ever expanding classifications work arguably as well with the "left-wing" I'd argue.
that's really relieving to hear
A more liberal stance means a less welfare state one. When you think the state shouldn't have a word on what happens inside companies and worker's rights and conditions... this is pretty self explanatory.
I honestly don't know, which is why I'm asking.
And I would lump both Trump and Le Pen as "catastrophically bad" candidates. Macron sounds nowhere near as bad as those two but I get the impression people really aren't huge fans of his economic policies.
I voted for himbut let's be real. The reason why people like him in Germany is because they know he'll do everything angela tells him to do. Just like Hollande before him. He'll be a yes man. It's sad but it's true.(because I felt like I had no choice)
I've never heard anyone in Germany say anything like that. I like him because he's pro-EU, progressive and anti-fascist etc.
I voted for himbut let's be real. The reason why people like him in Germany is because they know he'll do everything angela tells him to do. Just like Hollande before him. He'll be a yes man. It's sad but it's true.(because I felt like I had no choice)
More about france not leaving europe.I voted for himbut let's be real. The reason why people like him in Germany is because they know he'll do everything angela tells him to do. Just like Hollande before him. He'll be a yes man. It's sad but it's true.(because I felt like I had no choice)
Thanks for this explanation. I'm still trying to wrap my head around all of this since it's obvious American and European politics don't have a ton in common.As a non-French citizen, personally I would consider myself somewhere between a left-liberal and a social democrat depending on the issue (Bernie was closest to me politically in the US race, I often vote for the social democratic party in Canada, I'd be left of Labour in the UK, I'd vote PS in France in general, I'd probably vote D66 or GroenLinks or maybe Labour in Netherlands, etc.) I don't view it as a choice between bad and catastrophic.
Le Pen is catastrophic, there's no doubt about that. She is against dignity, against kindness, against solidarity, and her actions to destabilize the greatest agent for peace the world has ever assembled are unconscionable. More to the point, her father should have spent most of his life rotting in jail and it's abominable that she has a public presence at all. If I was a prosecutor, I'd probably have tried to make charges stick over the Vel D'hiv stuff a few weeks ago. I do not see how anyone who has a love for peace and unity could ever support her.
But I view Macron as acceptable. France does not end every time it elects a UPM president. I am concerned that Macron will take steps against French economic values, but those questions can be litigated later, and at any rate I think he is less likely to do so than any UPM/LR candidate. I liked Segoline Royal over Hollande, think Hollande was a truly awful president, and think Hamon is a good candidate (actually maybe the best PS has had in a long time) -- but given that the winds of change were what they were, Macron is not bad in my opinion.
dead[IM]https://media.giphy.com/media/xUA7aZLLjVzkK35KTK/giphy.gif[/IMG]
Mélenchon is saddened by both candidates in the second round being in favor of the current institutions? Has he not read MLP's program with regards to Europe?