I know this... I can see your point.
But you seem to imply being Westernized means you'll automatically respond positively to Western occupation. I'm not sure, is that true?
I do think there are differences in the Japanese cultural character compared with Muslim societies. The Japanese attitude is to find order in the group and accept authority, while the Islamic character is to righteously struggle.
Hell, even American values would probably ensure that an occupier of America would never attain perfect control... "Don't tread on me" and self-defense mythology, etc. Underground militia groups would struggle without end against occupation.
Ideas dictate behaviour, and different societies cherish different ideas.
I know it is a bit silly to do historical what ifs, but I believe that:
If japan had taken Hawaii hostage like it intended, the US would have folded, because you don't sacrifice the population of an entire state just to keep supplying a war you are not even formally part of yet.
If the offensive on Europe had failed and two atomic bombs had dropped on the US, they would have surreendered, because you don't keep going on a lost war when the opponent can keep dropping nukes.
The problem is not a culture of defiance versus a culture of obedience, but a culture that identifies itself with the state and the general notion of a nacional identity and a culture that identifies itself with a book of crazy people about talking bushes and dubious prophecies and other insanities. As much as conservatives like to talk about how they are one nation under god, they don't really actually act like it because of all the crazy shit I have seen conservatives defending, I don't think I ever saw the notion that not being christian also makes you not a citizen in a way that your basic human rights are denied. A lot of american religious crazy talk is just talk, they act according to human law first and crazy old talking talking bush book law, at best, as a distant second.
The state might not be entirely reliable, it can be used for a lot of evil, etc and such, but at least it's not a crazy fairy tale about phantoms, undeads and sorcery which can be seen as either messages of peace or call to arms against people who maybe believe the other sorcery book.
There is a passage in Simone de Beauveoir's book "the blood of others" where they question the validity of a resistance that has very little chance of success and yet provokes the nazis into killing innocents. An Isis member faced with this dilema would just go "our crazy phantom guy in the cloud will do magic to protect you after death!" and continue their insane whatever they do.