Lucie Goosey
Member
If you mean “breakaway success” then maybe 1.
If “profitable enough to keep the studio open” then maybe 2-3.
This would be my bet as well. Well said.
If you mean “breakaway success” then maybe 1.
If “profitable enough to keep the studio open” then maybe 2-3.
Pretty much my thoughts as well.I'd say 2 at most can become really succesful, maybe 2 more can "carry their own weight" but I also expect at least 2 to to crash and burn.
I think Marathon could do well as a new ip, because you already have the Destiny community who most likely will try it.Depends on their names. Something new? Most likely will fail. Something with a familiar name or based on a franchise? Will prolly do decent for a while.
I think Marathon could do well as a new ip
Foamstars is Square Enix.I imagine Helldivers 2 will be the only successful one and it actually looks alright. Foamstars is a shameless free to play rip off of a better game and I've no idea what the others are... Nor do I care to be honest.
The new goal is to have six live service games out by March 2026, not 2025. Sony counts they fiscal years differently than other companies.It's time.
Last week, Hiroki Totoki proclaimed that PlayStation is set to release 6 Live Service games by March 2025. There's been a lot of talk on NeoGAF about this Live Service strategy so I thought it would be interesting to create an Eat Crow mechanism. I've set a reminder for March 1st, 2025 in my phone. This thread will be bumped on said date so a percentage of GAFers can...
Question: How many of the six do you think will prove successful?
Important: Answers are public. You can not change your vote. Take your time and choose wisely.
Someone tell me this is not true.The new goal is to have six live service games out by March 2026, not 2025. Sony counts they fiscal years differently than other companies.
Someone tell me this is not true.
Sony Commits to Launch Just Six of PlayStation's 12 Live Service Games by March 2026 - IGN
Sony president Hiroki Totoki has said the company is reviewing PlayStation's live service game push amid development trouble that has already seen Naughty Dog’s The Last of Us multiplayer game hit with setbacks.www.ign.com
For other companies, FY25 means what it should mean: the financial year ending on March 2025; but for Sony, that's the financial year starting on April 2025 and going through March 2026.
I don’t think they will have any luck with their GAAS games. Sony fans are not used to that kind of games and also there are many GAAS games already.
Anything with microtransactions is automatically a no is our house now. So in the end, I hope they all fail.
Don’t know, maybe the fanbase I talk about is too hardcore. Also, as you said yourself, most of these games are third party and there are a lot already. But who knows.A big portion of their audience is Fortnite, CoD, Apex Legends, Destiny, etc.
So their casual audience certainly is used to GaaS type games
I don’t care what any company makes or loses. I’m not being thrown every micro-transaction a company hires a psychologist to find at myself or my kids.So you want PlayStation to only have high-risk IP and dwindling profit. Nice
None of them are SOCOM or Warhawk so my estimate is 0% chance of successLikely candidates are any of the following:
Helldivers 2
Marathon
Horizon Online
London Studios new game
Concord
Fairgame$
Twisted Metal
Any of the others very well could still land within that window, in which case we might not know which 6 Totoki was referring to.
I don’t care what any company makes or loses. I’m not being thrown every micro-transaction a company hires a psychologist to find at myself or my kids.
If you wish to do that, have fun. When there is a single player game that I paid full price for and no micro-transactions, I will buy it for myself or my children. I’m not having my kids groomed by these people to give up their money as adults for digital goods that have no value.