I'm talking more in terms of how they will look campaigning together. Romney is so weird.Try thinking like someone who believes in limited government, fiscal conservatism, personal responsibility - when you do, a few people come to mind.
That's rich. It's hard when you're just dismissing people as trolls, huh?Discussion here would be so much more engaging and enlightening if there weren't so many blind partisans...
Wtf..you guys weeny even having an argument....I don't even know what the argument is about anymore.
I'll leave.
Lol..... Kind of like when you dismiss people as partisans when you can't understand economics???Very well said - except that I would say that Republicans believe Government is necessary, but just to a much more limited extent (defense, infrastructure, commerce). Clearly Both Obama and Romney want whats best for the country. Discussion here would be so much more engaging and enlightening if there weren't so many blind partisans...
Is that you, David Brooks, High Arbiter of Seriousness?Discussion here would be so much more engaging and enlightening if there weren't so many blind partisans...
Discussion here would be so much more engaging and enlightening if there weren't so many blind partisans...
Like no one did pranks in high school. lol
Hostile to multiculturalism? Allowing thinly veiled racists to run a state how they choose? Sounds like we're just picking and choosing what laws we want to follow and don't want to follow. What happens when California grants all illegal immigrants citizenship? Is Arizona going to lock up that border also?it's obvious that a certain parts of the country want the US to go in a more liberal direction whereas others want to go in a more conservative... so why are people so against states rights? why can others have single payer if they want? what if other states are hostile to mutlicutluralism and don't like it? why do we not have the right to choose? why are we being rejected our 10th amendment rights?
i don't know why we all have to think that all 50 states should be the same.
My friend.Hostile to multiculturalism? Allowing thinly veiled racists to run a state how they choose? Sounds like we're just picking and choosing what laws we want to follow and don't want to follow. What happens when California grants all illegal immigrants citizenship? Is Arizona going to lock up that border also?
Like no one did pranks in high school. lol
Are You Ready for Some Voter Fraud?
At this pace, Obama is going to have a very hard time talking about Romney's acting out of political expediency. If he's had the ability to do this the whole time, what's he been waiting for?
it's obvious that a certain parts of the country want the US to go in a more liberal direction whereas others want to go in a more conservative... so why are people so against states rights? why can others have single payer if they want? what if other states are hostile to mutlicutluralism and don't like it? why do we not have the right to choose? why are we being rejected our 10th amendment rights?
i don't know why we all have to think that all 50 states should be the same.
PPACA? Dodd-Frank? Auto bailout? Why am I trying to argue with you?Oh wait, were people under the assumption that every move Obama makes is not for political expediency?
Oh wait, were people under the assumption that every move Obama makes is not for political expediency?
Um.Today's announcement about illegal immigration is amazing. He's going to get the Hispanic vote mobilized with this, since it's a huge step forward. How it'll affect younger Hispanics is obvious, but for their parents... Their parents will love this. Their children will have a shot at legitimacy, at long last. Hispanics, both young and old, will support this measure.
My friend.
It's somedude.
If the people of North Carolina oppose multicutluralism then it's there right to choose this.
If the people of North Carolina oppose multicutluralism then it's there right to choose this.
If they choose to oppose inter-racial marriage its their right too then?
I'd really honestly like to know if you'd prefer fifty separate nations. It seems to be a running theme throughout your posts, what about the current union do you actually like?
I don't like how we aren't following the constitution. And as long as were part of the United States I think we should follow it.
the 10th amendment says anything that isn't int he constitution should be left up to the states.
I'd really honestly like to know if you'd prefer fifty separate nations. It seems to be a running theme throughout your posts, what about the current union do you actually like?
Why am I trying to argue with you?
Interesting. Somedude has evolved from loony "will the crazy south secede" to loony "states should be able to do anything they want, it's in the Constitution" trolling.
Yes.If they choose to oppose inter-racial marriage its their right too then?
Really? You do know the amendments beyond 10 count?I don't like how we aren't following the constitution. And as long as were part of the United States I think we should follow it.
Or the articles of confederation.... which Europe looks a lot like.Hey if every state had enough rights to be considered their own nation but still use the U.S. currency things would be great. Just look at the European Union. ...oh wait.
Yes.
I don't like how we aren't following the constitution. And as long as were part of the United States I think we should follow it.
the 10th amendment says anything that isn't int he constitution should be left up to the states.
I raelly don't see how I'm anti-american. Mitt ROmney may have past a health care law, but he did it only to massachussets.
I don't like how we aren't following the constitution. And as long as were part of the United States I think we should follow it.
the 10th amendment says anything that isn't int he constitution should be left up to the states.
I raelly don't see how I'm anti-american. Mitt ROmney may have past a health care law, but he did it only to massachussets.
BoredAre you guys new here or just bored?
So do you honestly disagree with Loving v. Virginia Supreme Court decision? And if so, on what grounds?
Are you guys new here or just bored?
Looks like Obama passed Rubio's version of DREAM passed via executive order.
Bob Lutz has put Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney's numerous past comments about the automotive bailout behind him, according to Automotive News. During a recent episode of "The Kudlow Report" on CNBC, the former auto executive made it clear he now backs Romney for the 2012 presidential election, saying "[Romney] now says he was totally in favor of [the bailout] and suggested it."
He has maintained his opposition to the auto bailouts publicly along the campaign trail, and Lutz's comment is the first news we've heard of the candidate's apparent change of heart. As recently as February 18, Lutz himself criticized the presidential candidate for his stance, especially for suggesting that the automakers simply needed to borrow from banks.
By the way guys, yesterday Anderson Cooper clobbered Mitt Romney's spokeswoman. It was pathetic to watch. Here's the spoiler: She didn't know what CBO is (lols).
Really? You do know the amendments beyond 10 count?
Are you guys new here or just bored?
Oh wait, were people under the assumption that every move Obama makes is not for political expediency?
Who gives a shit about the why, it's a move in the right direction, and that's what matter.Certainly not, this just reeks of such a blatant grab. Why wasn't this done years ago? I'd imagine the administration kept it in the card deck because Hispanics support Obama in such big numbers, and likely figured they wouldn't care about the timing as compared to the benefit.
It'll be interesting to see how Hispanic commentators/news reports on this, and how Romney reacts. In some ways this is like Rubio's watered down Dream Act.
surprised he didnt say this yestardayI certainly did not see a move like this coming. And judging by the Republican responses, neither did they.
Check out Drudge's front page. It says this tracks closely to Rubio's plan. I don't normally give Obama props but this is brilliant. Not only is it good policy that helps Hispanics, it destroys Rubio's brand; he crrtainly can't be VP as the "blueprint" of this. Two birds with one stone
I give the move 8 out of 11 dimensions of chess.I certainly did not see a move like this coming. And judging by the Republican responses, neither did they.