I don't understand why his campaign is doing this tuff. It's.... strange.
I don't get Solyndra at all. Wasn't it part of a bigger green energy plan that eventually more than payed itself off?
I don't get Solyndra at all. Wasn't it part of a bigger green energy plan that eventually more than payed itself off?
I don't understand why his campaign is doing this stuff. It's.... strange.
As someone who lives in Omaha, I know that people in CB clean off their tables with their tongues.
I have talked to a lot of people on this side of the river and not one heard anything about this. Must be a CB thing.
So..Egypt just witnessed the most silent and smoothest coup d'etat today. Supreme council court declares Parliament invalid, SCAF says it will command total legislative authority, dissolve the parliament and create a new legislative assembly. That historic election couple of weeks ago? lol
It was basically an arms race with China but with solar technology. We got outspent. Republicans try to pin it on the President when it was their baby originally.
If it had been solar powered guns then the Republicans probably would have given it a three trillion dollar budget.
I get really uneasy at times with how successful autocracy has been for China.
It really hasnt. They have a MASSIVE corruption problem. This corruption problem also contributed to a massive real estate bubble that should pop eventually (lot of empty buildings) since local officials were giving the go-ahead to private and govt real estate projects that made them wealthy and looked good.
Banking system is messed up too since their state-businesses get access to a bunch of cheap loans while the little guys have to go to loan sharks.
Not to mention the huge demographic issues that are going to screw china over in the future
Nobody gets it. I mean you see kosmo (republicans) constantly bitching about it yet they don't lift a finger when big energy gets billions in subsidies. I'd love to see them bitch about that.I don't get Solyndra at all. Wasn't it part of a bigger green energy plan that eventually more than payed itself off?
They're growing, but that's because they have a GDP less than half of ours despite having four times as many people. Their growth rate (about 3x the U.S. average) seems impressive only if you leave those facts out. And their rate was .7% less than Turkmenistan's last year. Uh, do we have to watch out for Turkmenistan now too?I get really uneasy at times with how successful autocracy has been for China.
They're growing, but that's because they have a GDP less than half of ours despite having four times as many people. Their growth rate (about 3x the U.S. average) seems impressive only if you leave those facts out. And their rate was .7% less than Turkmenistan's last year. Uh, do we have to watch out for Turkmenistan now too?
Turkmenistan doesn't have a fourth of the world's population..
Turkmenistan doesn't have a fourth of the world's population..
Exactly his point, dude.
Correct. Also why their terrible growth isn't an issue.
That is the key difference in ideology, though.
Democrats believe the state is responsible for the welfare of the people, should take care of everyone's needs, etc.
Republicans believe that people, communities, and families should be responsible for the people's welfare and that government in an unnecessary and intrusive organization in people's lives. Hardline conservatives believe that Government should only serve to do what is delineated in the constitution. regulate commerce, military, etc. Republicans are stuck on King George as if government will always be an enemy to the people and to freedom. Which I can agree with many times (especially in the age of warrantless search and seizure, drones, etc) but on an overarching sense I do not.
I think that Romney believes he would be an efficient and successful president, I doubt he just wants to do it just to do it. True believer and all that
It's a scandal inasmuch that the republicans are trying to just pin something on Obama. It hits two birds with one stone: green initiative and Obama program.
...a program that was looked at objectively under Bush and determined to not be financially sound.
House Republicans investigating Solyndra have claimed that the Bush administration ultimately rejected the Solyndra loan, but that's not quite the case. Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee and news media point out that Bush energy officials wanted to get the loan closed on their way out the door it was listed as the first of their "three highest priorities through January 15." (Obama took office Jan. 20, 2009.) But the Energy Department's credit committee held things up for more analysis.
"The number of issues unresolved makes a recommendation for approval premature at this time. Therefore, the committee, without prejudice, remands the project to the LGPO [Loan Guarantee Program Office] for further development of information," the committee said.
It noted Solyndra's project "appears to have merit." But the clock had run out.
That didn't keep Bush from touting the loan guarantee program on his way out of office. On Jan. 6, 2009, in remarks on conservation and the environment from the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, he said, "We dedicated more than $18 billion to developing clean and efficient technologies like biofuels, advanced batteries and hydrogen fuel cells, solar and wind power, and clean, safe nuclear power. We're providing more than $40 billion in loan guarantees to put these technologies to use."
Turkmenistan's GDP grew by a larger percentage than China's last year. 9.9% vs. 9.2%.Correct. Also why their terrible growth isn't an issue.
Btw, why hasn't anybody mentioned Obama's speech today?
Guess he really is doomed if even Poligaf didn't notice.
EPA issues new soot regulations
The new rule is a political hot potato, and Democrats tried to delay its issue until after the election. However, a lawsuit forced their hand.
The new rule would set the maximum allowable standard for soot at range of 12 to 13 micrograms per cubic meter of air. The current annual standard is 15 micrograms per cubic meter.
Yeah, it's been nothing but poison pills and stunt legislation, which is why most democracies limit the campaign period.Been the constant theme of the Democrats. Keep punting off making laws in fear of this years election. Good to see some states force their hand.
Still a long way to go.
But what about China?
I already pointed out that this was a 3 year process and Bush attempted to speed it up. Even then the committee rejected the offer without prejudice, and the very same committee accepted the offer later after the application was revamped. If he or any republican actually had evidence that Obama interfered with the process, I am sure we would have actually heard about it. Instead we get some vague emails where some of the committee members express some reservation about the loan. It's retarded.
Btw, why hasn't anybody mentioned Obama's speech today?
Guess he really is doomed if even Poligaf didn't notice.
Dude need to sell his dressage horse and get himself a fact checker.This is an awesome and hilarious news item:
http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/14/12220270-what-happened-to-nemschoff-chairs?lite
I believe the original premise was that someone was somewhat concerned with how well China was doing, considering it was a mostly state-run economy, implying that they might have finally found the magic balance with market forces where so many other straight command economies fail.
Someone said, correctly, "yeah, but they're actually not that successful. they have a huge problem with corruption and a real estate bubble that everyone can see [prices will collapse], and considering their population, they should be doing much better."
Someone replied, "yeah, but look at that population."
To which everyone replied, "exactly."
Fair point but I don't agree with the bolded. Of course China isn't going to rival the west in standard of living or GDP per capita. A little over half a century ago they were a feudal society stuck in the 19th (possibly even 18th) century. The country has been rapidly developing and comparing them to India, who gained independence around the same time, you can see the staggering difference between the two.
Also China is not a straight command economy. It has very mild command economy elements.
Speech from ohio for those interested:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfmU6_1nu44
Dude knows how to write speech and how to emote, that's for damn sure.
He also just burst romney's entire campaign for the foreseeable future.
Fair point but I don't agree with the bolded. Of course China isn't going to rival the west in standard of living or GDP per capita. A little over half a century ago they were a feudal society stuck in the 19th (possibly even 18th) century. The country has been rapidly developing and comparing them to India, who gained independence around the same time, you can see the staggering difference between the two.
Also China is not a straight command economy. It has very mild command economy elements.
"Nothing I did worked for four years, give me four more years so I can do something else." ok
Dude knows how to write speech and how to emote, that's for damn sure.
He also just burst romney's entire campaign for the foreseeable future.
Right, which is why I said ....found the magic balance with market forces where so many other straight command economies fail. ADR, but you're not reading very well today.
Could be worse, could be emulating Mitt's other high school "pranking" days.
I really wonder who Romney is going to pick for VP nominee.
Every single person I think of just makes it look all so... strange. He isn't meant for anyone.
Try thinking like someone who believes in limited government, fiscal conservatism, personal responsibility - when you do, a few people come to mind.
That is the key difference in ideology, though.
Democrats believe the state is responsible for the welfare of the people, should take care of everyone's needs, etc.
Republicans believe that people, communities, and families should be responsible for the people's welfare and that government in an unnecessary and intrusive organization in people's lives. Hardline conservatives believe that Government should only serve to do what is delineated in the constitution. regulate commerce, military, etc. Republicans are stuck on King George as if government will always be an enemy to the people and to freedom. Which I can agree with many times (especially in the age of warrantless search and seizure, drones, etc) but on an overarching sense I do not.
I think that Romney believes he would be an efficient and successful president, I doubt he just wants to do it just to do it. True believer and all that