And nv seems like it's in the bag. What timezone are they in?If you give Romney CO, NV NH, VA, FL, NC he would still lose to Obama (271-267)
And nv seems like it's in the bag. What timezone are they in?If you give Romney CO, NV NH, VA, FL, NC he would still lose to Obama (271-267)
If you give Romney CO, NV NH, VA, FL, NC he would still lose to Obama (271-267)
Nevada is PST.And nv seems like it's in the bag. What timezone are they in?
If Obama loses nh, does Iowa + Ohio still do it for him?
Because he thought Romney already WAS put away, kinda like AlteredBeast over here.I'm personally even more pissed at Obama after last night. He clearly could have put Romney away for good 2 weeks ago. Why he chose not too, I'll never understand.
Crap, I was hoping mountain. Oh we'll. hopefully Colorado goes blue thenNevada is PST.
Yeah, OH and IA means a win, end of story.
Who knows, over-confident, over-worked, mind elsewhere (it was on his anniversary). What matters now is that he rectified it and he's not lying down now.I'm personally even more pissed at Obama after last night. He clearly could have put Romney away for good 2 weeks ago. Why he chose not too, I'll never understand.
No problem! Yeah, most sites covering US politics will offer up 'balanced' coverage, but they're mostly just opinion pieces offered from the right or left perspective. Like just look through the list of what's offered on http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ everyday and you'll see how evident it is.Thanks for those. I like politico mostly because their articles are less editorialized.
As far as I can tell, that's exactly what he is going to do. He seems sincerely not to understand basic macroeconomics or the monetary system. Then again, neither does the progressive caucus, whose leaders recently sent a letter championing austerity as well. It's a serious problem.
Moar pollsYou people still want polls from IA LOL, you guys won't be satisfied till the day of the freaking election damn
You people still want polls from IA LOL, you guys won't be satisfied till the day of the freaking election damn
Ah. Thank you.
Vermont is laughingly awesome. The students in that state gave Obama's biggest margin: 67% to 30%.Dems have the youth vote on lockdown for 2016/2020: http://magazines.scholastic.com/Election-2012/Vote
As far as I can tell, that's exactly what he is going to do. He seems sincerely not to understand basic macroeconomics or the monetary system. Then again, neither does the progressive caucus, whose leaders recently sent a letter championing austerity as well. It's a serious problem.
I want a 269 - 269 tie, dammit!
The more I read about the electoral college projections and early voting news in this thread the more I wonder why anyone considers this a close race at all. Didn't TA call it the most predictable election in recent times? I'm thinking he is right
I wonder what I'm missing (if anything)
Ha, 354-184 would be amazing. But it's scary how much of a lost-cause the south is, even in the long-term. Although the likes of Texas being that close (49-48) along with Georgia/SC is comforting. Put that shit into play in 8-12 years and that electoral map is fucked for the foreseeable future.Dems have the youth vote on lockdown for 2016/2020: http://magazines.scholastic.com/Election-2012/Vote
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/17/us-housing-idUSBRE89G0RG20121017(Reuters) - Groundbreaking on new U.S. homes surged in September to its fastest pace in more than four years, a sign the housing sector's budding recovery is gaining traction and supporting the wider economic recovery.
Housing starts increased 15 percent last month to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 872,000 units, the Commerce Department said on Wednesday.
That was the quickest pace since July 2008, though data on starts is volatile and subject to substantial revisions.
America's economy has shown signs of faster growth in recent months as the jobless rate has fallen and retail sales data has pointed to stronger consumer spending.
Wednesday's data showed that housing, which was battered by the 2007-09 recession, is increasingly one of the brighter spots in the economy.
fun for the history books,
disastrous on the legitamcy of the next 4 years
I'm personally even more pissed at Obama after last night. He clearly could have put Romney away for good 2 weeks ago. Why he chose not too, I'll never understand.
Housing starts surge in positive sign for economy
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/17/us-housing-idUSBRE89G0RG20121017
FOURNIER: Verdict Uncertain...
ANDREW SULLIVAN: 'I Am Bloody Elated'...
DICK MORRIS: Romney won the second debate...
TREAT: CANDY GIVES OBAMA 9% MORE TIME...
INTERRUPTS ROMNEY 28X...
TRICK: 'Throws the Flag'...
CANDYLAND: Romney was 'right in the main' on Benghazi, but 'picked the wrong word'...
Another debacle for America's media...
Reporters applaud Obama slam on Romney wealth...
Pelley: 'Most Rancorous Debate In History'...
'Nauseating'...
LUNTZ GROUP: BIG SWING...
MSNBC Undecided Voter Panel Swayed -- by Romney?
Threats to Assassinate Republican Explode on TWITTER After Debate...
To add a data point: the context of the high water mark since 2008 is useful. But I found the year over year increase indicative of trajectory: starts are up 35% from last year.Housing starts surge in positive sign for economy
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/17/us-housing-idUSBRE89G0RG20121017
Woah I am dizzy!So much spin on Drudge
Not even time nice try.gallup, o49 r46
Posting this again
New Romney ad with debate footage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=j7mCKnLqVZs
I first I thought it was going to be footage of Obama saying something, I was wrong haha.
Yikes that Gallup is bad. Romney at 51%
Gallup, R+1 registered, likely, approval steady. 48/46 RV 51/46 LV.
Gallup, R+1 registered, likely, approval steady. 48/46 RV 51/46 LV.
It was said before that Gallup's sampling of southern voters is really causing this uptick for Romney right? Or was that for that late US Today poll that came out? Or both? There was a break down before showing Obama in the positive (in single digits) with different groups but with a negative 22 on Southern voters.
That goes without saying does it not?Nate Silver has a timely article on how the tracking polls show a tie on average and polls that revisit the same sample repeatedly (YouGov, RAND) are showing quite different results from polls that take new samples constantly, suggesting that the change is due to respondent enthusiasm (to the poll) rather than an actual move in vote share.
Yikes that Gallup is bad. Romney at 51%
Yeah, on first-glance that Gallup is bad, but aren't they still on that 7-day rolling average? Might take a while to see the after-effects (if any) of the debate.