Yeah, on first-glance that Gallup is bad, but aren't they still on that 7-day rolling average? Might take a while to see the after-effects (if any) of the debate.
I don't think the rv-LV spread will be so big in reality and I don't think the debate could have caused a 10 pt swing (from o+5 to r+5) but the optics alone are somewhat bad.Yeah, on first-glance that Gallup is bad, but aren't they still on that 7-day rolling average? Might take a while to see the after-effects (if any) of the debate.
Anybody got a link to that Gallup poll? Followed a link in twitter, came up with nothing.
Yeah, this isn't surprising, and I've been convinced for a while that's what's been driving Romney's numbers. Not even really in the South, it's seemingly most rural areas at this point. They really do hate the POTUS.I don't think the rv-LV spread will be so big in reality and I don't think the debate could have caused a 10 pt swing (from o+5 to r+5) but the optics alone are somewhat bad.
White people in the south really hate Obama I guess.
I don't think the rv-LV spread will be so big in reality and I don't think the debate could have caused a 10 pt swing (from o+5 to r+5) but the optics alone are somewhat bad.
White people in the south really hate Obama I guess.
I can't suggest any specific outlet, but this article (and Jon Chait in general) is amazing.
http://nymag.com/news/politics/elections-2012/obama-romney-economic-plans-2012-10/
Maybe mechanically, but it could demoralize voters to see Obama down so much if its like this and we get closer. I'd say they have to be within 2 of each other By next wednesday or Gallup will risk credibility if Obama wins.Thankfully, the electoral college completely mitigates their vote.
So are we going to continue to go though this with gallup everyday?
It wont like at all.Maybe mechanically, but it could demoralize voters to see Obama down so much if its like this and we get closer. I'd say they have to be within 2 of each other By next wednesday or Gallup will risk credibility if Obama wins.
So are we going to continue to go though this with gallup everyday?
MULawPoll: New MU Law Poll has Obama at 49%, Romney 48% among likely voters in WI. #mulawpoll
http://nationaljournal.com/politics/poll-race-tied-in-wisconsin-20121017Poll: Race Tied in Wisconsin
A new poll released Wednesday shows President Obama and Mitt Romney tied in Wisconsin, erasing the significant lead that Obama had built following the Democratic convention and putting the state's 10 electoral votes firmly in play.
The Marquette Law School poll shows Obama leading Romney, 49 percent to 48 percent, well within the poll's margin of error of plus-or-minus 3.4 percentage points. Only 2 percent of voters remain undecided.
In late September, just before Romney's impressive performance in the first presidential debate, Obama held an 11-point lead, 53 percent to 42 percent.
Likely voters are split on the president's job performance: 48 percent approve, and 48 percent disapprove. A slim majority, 52 percent, view Obama favorably, compared to 45 percent who view him unfavorably. That is slightly better than Romney's image, which is 46 percent favorable, versus 48 percent unfavorable. Forty-nine percent of Badger State voters have a favorable impression of home-state Rep. Paul Ryan, the GOP vice-presidential nominee.
The poll of 870 likely voters was conducted Oct. 11-14, largely after the Oct. 11 vice presidential debate featuring Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan.
Totally forgot he was on now. Wow @ the rolled-up sleeves/loosened up tie look.Obama incorporating "sketchy" into his stump speech.
The Liberal Democrats sought PR because it essentially guarantees multipartism. The obverse of Duverger's Law, Duverger's hypothesis, posits that a PR system engenders multipartism. And the evidence is strong for that postulate. But the evidence for the obverse, that plurality voting engenders a two-party equilibrium, is not as strong. So, of course they'll favor PR. It effectively guarantees multiparty representation. Whereas the current system, while not assuring their demise, at least permits the possibility.the UK will revert to two-party dominant, it is inevitable. this is why the liberal democrats wanted proportional representation to be included as part of their coalition deal with the conservatives.
the last election was also something of an outlier, with a terrible labor leader and a dynamic young third party leader. labor will get their shit together and the system will revert eventually. any change in the two-party system is only temporary without a change in the voting system. the "tendency" will always be to revert to two-parties, so any miraculous third party run is only temporary. i feel like you're nitpicking at what i said only to reach the same conclusion.
MULawPoll: Senate race in Wis is also now a tie, Franklin says, at Thompson 46%, Baldwin 45%. #mulawpoll
It is they are not tied.??? I thought Thompson's campaign was self-destructing.
The election in 2010 wasn't terribly dissimilar from earlier elections. The Liberals have been flirting with one-fifth of the vote for three decades. Their subsistence is incongruous with Duverger's specifications.
tnr said:Indeed, Wisconsin could be Obama's best battleground state and it might be the only battleground state where Obama has nearly locked up the votes he needs to win reelection. Although the state remains characteristically tight, post-debate polls show Obama at or above 49 percentjust like 21 of the 23 surveys conducted in the Badger State since the gubernatorial recall election, and a higher percentage than any other battleground state. No, there haven't been many post-debate polls, but the post-DNC surveys showed Obama leading by 7 points--better than any other battleground. Similarly, the Wisconsin Recall exit polls found Obama leading Romney by 7 in a very Republican-friendly electorate. This isn't to say that Romney can't win Wisconsin, just that he appears likelier to win in most of the other battleground states where at least a few polls show him in the lead and Obama holds less than 49 percent of the vote, including the pivotal state of Ohio.
The polls are not alone in viewing Wisconsin as less competitive than the other battleground states; the campaigns might believe it too. The Obama and Romney campaigns kept Wisconsin on the back-burner throughout most of the summer and didn't invest in the state until a week following the major party conventions. The Obama campaign even chose to initially spend dollars defending Pennsylvania instead of Wisconsin. And in September, the Obama campaign was content to allow Romney to out-advertise them by more than 2:1 in western Wisconsin, despite the resources to fight on a level playing field in inexpensive media markets. While this might be surprising given the state's demographics, it's less surprising given it's electoral history. In 2008, Obama won Wisconsin by more than 16 pointsmore than any other battleground State. Wisconsin has voted for Democrats in six consecutive presidential elections and it's the only battleground that never voted for George W. Bush. These aren't reasons why Romney can't win Wisconsin, just reasons why it's more difficult than the other battlegrounds.
It is they are not tied.
That poll makes no sense then.
Cant fret over one poll thoughThat poll makes no sense then.
MULawPoll: Among those who watched Denver debate, Romney up 50-48. Among those who didnt, Obama up 50-42. #mulawpoll
Good article.Obama still at 49 percent.
Nate Cohn just did an article on Wisconsin:
http://www.tnr.com/blog/electionate...-its-one-obamas-strongest-battleground-states
Ain't gonna stress.
Cant fret over one poll though
Cant fret over one poll though
Apparently due to the death of my racist uncle-in-law my staunch Republican parents-in-law will be staying with us over the week of the election.
That should be entertaining.
My wife told me to buy some Obama-Biden shirts. I'm...well, undecided.
Ok?They are the best pollster in WI. Highly respected.
Apparently due to the death of my racist uncle-in-law my staunch Republican parents-in-law will be staying with us over the week of the election.
That should be entertaining.
My wife told me to buy some Obama-Biden shirts. I'm...well, undecided.
Its annoying.Pollsters releasing polls that were conducted a week ago is lol.
They are the best pollster in WI. Highly respected. One of the very few to get the recall election dead on.