• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2012 |OT4|: Your job is not to worry about 47% of these posts.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cloudy

Banned
AB, if you never thought Romney had a chance till today, what changed?

Romney has always had a 50-50 chance due to the polarized electorate and the fact that Obama's now an incumbent
 

Diablos

Member
AB, if you never thought Romney had a chance till today, what changed?

Romney has always had a 50-50 chance due to the polarized electorate and the fact that Obama's now an incumbent

Ehh even pre-conventions you could argue Obama potentially having a 5, perhaps 10 point spread where it counts
 
AB, if you never thought Romney had a chance till today, what changed?

Romney has always had a 50-50 chance due to the polarized electorate and the fact that Obama's now an incumbent

His point is that Romney is such a bad candidate with so many disadvantages, running against the best campaign team of all time...and is still in a toss up race. He blames it on the people, I blame if on the candidate.

This thread spent weeks claiming Ohio was a sure bet, nothing to worry about, and lampooned those who dared think otherwise. Well despite saving the auto industry and supporting unions, Obama is barely leading in Ohio. That's pathetic. And again: we wouldn't be having this discussion if Obama showed up to the first debate.

As I said no one should throw their hands up for either candidate until tomorrow night. Stil, Obama's camp can't be happy seeing the map crumble for two weeks
 
His point is that Romney is such a bad candidate with so many disadvantages, running against the best campaign team of all time...and is still in a toss up race. He blames it on the people, I blame if on the candidate.

This thread spent weeks claiming Ohio was a sure bet, nothing to worry about, and lampooned those who dared think otherwise. Well despite saving the auto industry and supporting unions, Obama is barely leading in Ohio. That's pathetic. And again: we wouldn't be having this discussion if Obama showed up to the first debate.

As I said no one should throw their hands up for either candidate until tomorrow night. Stil, Obama's camp can't be happy seeing the map crumble for two weeks

You blame the candidate? Really? After all of Obama's accomplishments in spite of a Congress determined to block anything good he does and you blame him for half the country's stupidity in supporting a complete sociopath for a candidate?

Come the fuck on.
 

Forever

Banned
You blame the candidate? Really? After all of Obama's accomplishments in spite of a Congress determined to block anything good he does and you blame him for half the country's stupidity in supporting a complete sociopath for a candidate?

Come the fuck on.

It's PD. This can't be your first exposure to PD, can it?
 
His point is that Romney is such a bad candidate with so many disadvantages, running against the best campaign team of all time...and is still in a toss up race. He blames it on the people, I blame if on the candidate.

This thread spent weeks claiming Ohio was a sure bet, nothing to worry about, and lampooned those who dared think otherwise. Well despite saving the auto industry and supporting unions, Obama is barely leading in Ohio. That's pathetic. And again: we wouldn't be having this discussion if Obama showed up to the first debate.

As I said no one should throw their hands up for either candidate until tomorrow night. Stil, Obama's camp can't be happy seeing the map crumble for two weeks
Nate Silver has Ohio as a Lean Obama state. I trust him more than you.
 

AlteredBeast

Fork 'em, Sparky!
I definitely blame Americans for the most part, but Obama gets some of the blame for not taking advantage of his primetime first spot vs. Romney in the debate. Romney looked like the incumbent and Obama looked tarnished and unprepared.
 

Diablos

Member
Nate Silver has Ohio as a Lean Obama state. I trust him more than you.
Me too, but if it ends up being within a point:

CEdc4.jpg


This guy doesn't give a fuck and could potentially hand the election to Romney.
 
I definitely blame Americans for the most part, but Obama gets some of the blame for not taking advantage of his primetime first spot vs. Romney in the debate. Romney looked like the incumbent and Obama looked tarnished and unprepared.

Romney did one thing in that debate that Obama and his team had spent months attacking him on - looking Presidential. He passed that gap that had been putting off a lot of blue collar white voters in the Midwest and that is where the first debate was dangerous for Obama.
 

ISOM

Member
Romney did one thing in that debate that Obama and his team had spent months attacking him on - looking Presidential. He passed that gap that had been putting off a lot of blue collar white voters in the Midwest and that is where the first debate was dangerous for Obama.

As I said before debating the president automatically makes you look presidential, even if obama brang some heat to that debate. Romney by just being able to go toe to toe with obama is going to bring up the enthusiasm of those who weren't sure about romney being president. Romney was going to gain from the first debate no matter what.
 
Stop looking at individual polls

OH Poll average is Obama +1.4, not that different from PPP's poll. The more concerning part is the movement in PPP's poll.

As I said before debating the president automatically makes you look presidential, even if obama brang some heat to that debate. Romney by just being able to go toe to toe with obama is going to bring up the enthusiasm of those who weren't sure about romney being president. Romney was going to gain from the first debate no matter what.

I agree that the first debate always helps the challenger. Obama's problem was that the gap was so wide.
 

ISOM

Member
Me too, but if it ends up being within a point:

CEdc4.jpg


This guy doesn't give a fuck and could potentially hand the election to Romney.

I am sure anything in regards to voter fraud is being handled, until we get further evidence that it's happening more widespread lets just stick to what the polls tell us. There is no point in being negative here all the time.
 

Diablos

Member
"In his book published earlier this year, former Bain Capital partner and Mitt Romney supporter wrote this:"

Let’s not kid ourselves about just how cheap offshore labor really is. We not only pay substantially less per hour, we also avoid the costs we would incur if these workers immigrated here. We don’t pay for their medical expenses when they show up in the emergency room without insurance. We don’t pay for their pension costs if they don’t save for retirement. We don’t pay for their children’s public education. Nor do we pay for their out-of-wedlock children, their unemployment benefits and workers’ compensation, their slip and fall torts, their wear and tear on our public infrastructure, and the cost of their drunk driving, drug use and other crimes. We outsource pollution, its adverse effects on our health, and its clean-up costs. Neither the employees nor their employers are here to vote and seek political handouts.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021587557

What the fuck? So what does he want to do with the American workers who could have these jobs? Throw them in concentration camps? WTF. Why isn't the media talking about this?


Under the proposal, all personal exemptions, itemized deductions, personal credits except for the earned income credit, and all above-the-line adjustments to income except for retirement savings deductions and the deduction for self employment taxes would be repealed. The largest categories of deductions repealed are present-law deductions for home mortgage interest expenses, State and local taxes, and charitable contributions. In addition, the exclusions for certain employee fringe benefits, such as employer contributions for health and life insurance, would be repealed. The standard deduction would remain.

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/10/19/1046711/romney-tax-study-repeal/?mobile=nc

I won't lie, I am straight up terrified by this man. Terrified. The fact that we're looking at a 50/50 race that'll be likely somewhere in between 2000/2004 in how it plays out is so very disturbing.

Forever: I'd love to seriously volunteer but I work up to 50 hours a week.
 

Cloudy

Banned
Romney did one thing in that debate that Obama and his team had spent months attacking him on - looking Presidential. He passed that gap that had been putting off a lot of blue collar white voters in the Midwest and that is where the first debate was dangerous for Obama.

Just not true. The only thing he accomplished in that debate was to get the media off his back so they could attack Obama for 2 weeks.

The polls say 6/7% changed their minds after the debate (and that's both ways so pro Romney is even smaller)

What the debate did was accelerate the GOP homecoming to Romney. It would have happened regardless and we'd be blaming Obama's tone in the 2nd debate or something else
 

kingkitty

Member
President Romney doesn't sound that bad off the tongue tbh.

anywho for anyone in panic mode, just drink some delicious store bought eggnog, that always calms the nerves.
 

Eh? Everyone has a view of who they think will win. I don't believe Romney has a 100% chance, just a better chance than Obama. My point is there is no reason to panic right now, for either side. Monday could change that.

In short, calm down bro and wait for the final round
 

ISOM

Member
OH Poll average is Obama +1.4, not that different from PPP's poll. The more concerning part is the movement in PPP's poll.



I agree that the first debate always helps the challenger. Obama's problem was that the gap was so wide.

I think republican enthusiasm was just at a really low point with the whole libya thing and the 47 percent comment. They probably didn't think he was going to be president at all but the debates happened and they all came back which probably is the reason for the wide recovery for romney post the 1st debate. People just need to get it in their heads that this was always going to be a close election and stop bitching about everything.
 

Mully

Member
I don't follow the economy regularly, but 8% unemployment seems pretty normal to me. I know Obama didn't fulfill his campaign promise, but I really didn't expect much in 3.5 years. It's going to take more than 10 years to get the economy to get everything back to where it was in 2000. I don't care what Romney, Obama, or anyone else says.
 

ISOM

Member
I don't follow the economy regularly, but 8% unemployment seems pretty normal to me. I know Obama didn't fulfill his campaign promise, but I really didn't expect much in 3.5 years. It's going to take more than 10 years to get the economy to get everything back to where it was in 2000. I don't care what Romney, Obama, or anyone else says.

I think come election day people will see the economy is not bad, we are heading towards recovery and vote obama I honestly do
 

Diablos

Member
What is it with the double standards in this country? Obama's campaign almost completely imploded because of Rev. Wright's commentary post-9/11. He had to denounce him, his church, completely disassociate himself from it. And what seemed like by the act of some miracle he got back in the game, barely, and went on to get elected.

But the words of Rev. Wright were not Obama's. Sure he was his spiritual advisor and whatnot, but they were not his words.

Yet somehow, it's okay for Mitt to get away with calling half the country dirty, useless poors -- in a secret meeting behind closed doors, not in a Church where anyone from the general public could hear Rev. Wright. He lies his way through apologizing, says he cares about 100% of all Americans, and it's not a problem.

Does anyone else find that just a little upsetting?
 

Mgoblue201

Won't stop picking the right nation
If it were me, it would be to focus on the aforementioned 3 and then Colorado. Obama has a huge campaign office advantage there, but Romney has hung tight. If Romney got out there and moved his people who will surely do nothing in PA or WI and get Colorado to go red, it would be pretty impressive, especially with all that talk earlier in the year on GAF about how CO was forever to be a lost cause to Republicans based alone on how many new hispanics were there in the last 4 years.
He has to focus on VA, FL, and OH because he has no choice. Beyond those, he needs to try to contend NH as much as possible, because it's his best path to victory if he does not win CO. I'm not sure whether it's in his interest to pour resources into NV and IA, especially since the latter has started early voting. I want to say that he should at least try to keep them in play, but he also has to be realistic about his chances.
WI is close.

OH is the big prize. Obama must keep it at all costs. The PPP poll sucks in that regards.
Romney hasn't led, or even tied, a Wisconsin poll since late August. 538 gives Obama an 80% chance of winning - more than even Ohio.
The really bad Ohio poll...apart from the topline numbers the internals look bad for Obama.
Even putting aside the fact that the poll is no worse than many others in the past, I thought we would've learned by now not to extrapolate the state of an entire race based upon a single poll (or even a few polls). We should be no more likely to believe that Obama leads Ohio by one than we should believe that Obama leads Iowa by eight.
 

Zabka

Member
Unfortunately the simple act of Romney questioning Obama on Libya seems to help his case, no matter how much he fucks it up. The media has his back on it right now.

For some reason the public tilts towards people who "demand answers" even if the questions are idiotic.
 

norinrad

Member
America is hilarious. I always talk about the average IQ being 100, meaning that half are at or below that mark, and this is the most obvious way to prove that point.

The guy in the white house is also half black and that's a nightmare for old America. Too bad for them, they are a dying breed.
 
I think Obama still needs a grand closing argument, like the TV ad spots he released 3 weeks ago. Abortion, Auto Bailout, etc is fine. Still need some forward looking spots too. That 2 minute ad of Obama should be running again.

And Obama needs to do his best to tie Romney to Bush's foreign policy. The thing he failed to do for economics in the 1st debate.
 
What is it with the double standards in this country? Obama's campaign almost completely imploded because of Rev. Wright's commentary post-9/11. He had to denounce him, his church, completely disassociate himself from it. And what seemed like by the act of some miracle he got back in the game, barely, and went on to get elected.

But the words of Rev. Wright were not Obama's. Sure he was his spiritual advisor and whatnot, but they were not his words.

Yet somehow, it's okay for Mitt to get away with calling half the country dirty, useless poors -- in a secret meeting behind closed doors, not in a Church where anyone from the general public could hear Rev. Wright. He lies his way through apologizing, says he cares about 100% of all Americans, and it's not a problem.

Does anyone else find that just a little upsetting?

Mitt is a white man.
Obama is a minority, half-black, but you know the "One drop" rule.

White Privilege and all that jazz.
 

AniHawk

Member
rand showing:

48.07 obama
46.67 romney

closest it's been all month. looks like obama had a small debate bump and it's wearing off.
 

Diablos

Member
Fucking unbelievable.

Given that this is an election about the economy, I can't see the third debate doing much for Obama even if he wins. Unless, of course, Mitt kicks his ass.
 

AniHawk

Member
Fucking unbelievable.

in rand, the difference appears to be intention to vote. it's been generally the same for obama all week, while it's risen 3 points in the last three days for romney supporters.

for some good news, rand also shows a 1.8% shift from romney to obama in each of the last two days.
 
The RAND change is almost entirely in the intention to vote aspect. Romney supporters have increased by 2 percentage here while Obama's has dropped by 1 % (since the peaks of Obama +6).

I honestly have no idea what's causing these fluctuations. And it's impossible to know if this is concentrated in the South. i honestly don't understand what drives the intention to vote because you'd think by now someone would already decide if they're voting or not, especially if they partake in a weekly poll.

On the positive side, in RAND their Ohio sample is showing people switching from Romney to Obama more than the reverse the past 7 days.


I'm pretty much convinced at this point it's all up to Obama getting the vote out. Every model (except Gallup) shows Obama has a sizable lead among registered voters. It's all about getting them out there.
 

Diablos

Member
Blame me guys. I'm voting Obama and no one I've ever supported has won the Presidency. Nader-Kerry-Nader-Obama.
Vote for Romney?

:(

The RAND change is almost entirely in the intention to vote aspect. Romney supporters have increased by 2 percentage here why Obama's has dropped by 1 % (since the peaks of Obama +6).

I honestly have no idea what's causing these fluctuations. And it's impossible to know if this is concentrated in the South. i honestly don't understand what drives the intention to vote because you'd think by now someone would already decide if they're voting or not, especially if they partake in a weekly poll.

On the positive side, in RAND their Ohio sample is showing people switching from Romney to Obama more than the reverse the past 7 days.


I'm pretty much convinced at this point it's all up to Obama getting the vote out. Every model (except Gallup) shows Obama has a sizable lead among registered voters. It's all about getting them out there.
There's no way Dems are as excited to vote than Rethugs. If it comes down to turnout vs. turnout we've gotta hope that Obama ground game accounts for at least 1% in the states where he will desperately need it to win
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom