PhoenixDark
Banned
Obama better mention Romney's fp brain trust is entirely made up of Bush folks
Obama better mention Romney's fp brain trust is entirely made up of Bush folks
Obama better mention Romney's fp brain trust is entirely made up of Bush folks
Well the final debate is less than 20 hours away. Predictions on how it'll go? And what impact if any do you think it'll have on the overall election?
Well the final debate is less than 20 hours away. Predictions on how it'll go? And what impact if any do you think it'll have on the overall election?
Obama should also mention that those advisers don't believe Romney is even reading the memos they're giving him.
Is it in-person early voting?
Obama should also mention that those advisers don't believe Romney is even reading the memos they're giving him.
Well the final debate is less than 20 hours away. Predictions on how it'll go? And what impact if any do you think it'll have on the overall election?
Because people lieIf you early vote, you aren't really a "likely voter." You are a guaranteed voter. How can you be put in the same LV category as someone a model says is likely to vote? You are a 100% voter.
also y is anyone voting for rombot lOL idiots
Political scientists have found for years that citizens, aware of the socially correct answer, routinely lie to claim they voted when they had not.
But Aida, along with Harvard public policy professor Todd Rogers, did something that past researchers hadnt. They also looked up the records of those who had said they will not vote, an answer that prompts the operator to politely end the call and dial someone else. Greenberg Quinlan had excluded those people from their surveys, but Aida and Rogers found they were lying too, and at a higher rate than those who identified themselves as certain voters. Despite claiming they would not cast a ballot, 55 percent had
Finish it off with some smart line i haven't come up with about Romney = Bush.
'fool me once' etc
Wait where can I read about this?
Honestly, if I was the Obama team, I'd run this television ad:
- Show Bush pushing tax cuts, talk about simplifying tax cut, talk about "fuzzy math" about him giving tax cuts mostly to the rich from his 1st debate.
- Show graph of our deficit balooning and then how much tax cuts went to rich and wage growth vs profits
- show Romney pushing tax cuts, talk about cutting deductions, show "the numbers work, I ran a business" line from debate.
Finish it off with some smart line i haven't come up with about Romney = Bush. edit: Maybe something like "Last time it was fuzzy math. This time we're told to trust them, they know the numbers. Don't be fooled by their numbers again."
TBH, this should have been done weeks ago before the 1st debate (granted without the last part of Romney in the debate but replaced with stump or whatever).
kos said:North Carolina's One Stop Early Voting law allows people to register to vote and to cast their ballots early, all at the same time, all in one stop....
This is an over-generalization, but broadly Obama is indeed turning out new voters, whereas Romney is turning out the same old voters.
In total, 324,780 people voted in One-Stop Early Voting on Thursday and Friday. Of those, 42,709 were brand new previously unregistered voters. They did not pass any poll's "likely voter" screen, nor did they even pass any poll's registered voter screen. And yet, they voted. And it is clear that they voted overwhelmingly for Obama (probably by about 2 to 1).
Obama will likely win. All Obama really has to do is not fall apart on the inevitable Libya quest, and everything else should be in his favor.
My logic center: An Obama win on the merits, a tie in the press only because Romney won't appear to be a complete dumbass.Well the final debate is less than 20 hours away. Predictions on how it'll go? And what impact if any do you think it'll have on the overall election?
Christ, even his advisers have no idea how he'd govern on foreign policy, too?
Seriously, have we ever had such a vague candidate that literally no one actually knows how he'll govern?
Bob will do a fantastic job moderating. Both candidates will come out saying that they have won unless a candidate says something that is really really really really stupid.
Well the final debate is less than 20 hours away. Predictions on how it'll go? And what impact if any do you think it'll have on the overall election?
Since independent/undecided voters are idiots, when facing an incumbent, do they usually go for the challenger or the person already in office?
Since independent/undecided voters are idiots, when facing an incumbent, do they usually go for the challenger or the person already in office?
Because, again, people over here are stupid and think that austerity is necessary after spending too much. Again, they see this like a household budget. When you spend too much you have to cut spending a metric ton in order to get your financing straight. You don't look at a household budget and go "Wow this spending cuts suck, and we're really hungry. Let's not do them." No, you don't think that, because they're necessary, instead you think "Goddamn maybe I shouldn't have spent everything like a dumbass so frivolously."
Economies don't work like that, but the common man thinks they do. That's the problem. And when you have to explain something you've already lost.
US Presidential Foreign Policy Debate |OT| Devoid of charm. Mildly offensive.US Presidential Foreign Policy Debate |OT| Can You Say it a Little Louder?
Neither -- they split pretty evenly.
edit: It's really unproductive to call undecided voters idiots.
Climbing the mountain of conflictUS Foreign Policy Debate |OT| Bomb Iran, or Bomb Iran Twice?
US Presidential Foreign Policy Debate |OT| Devoid of charm. Mildly offensive.
I would be fucking mortified if Akin was elected here.
Debate OT titles? There can only be one:
US Presidential Foreign Policy Debate |OT| Please proceed, governor
Debate OT titles? There can only be one:
US Presidential Foreign Policy Debate |OT| Please proceed, Diablos
Someone please turn this into debate fanfic. I don't want to embarass myself.Holy shit, David Gregory must have been looking at naked pics of Soledad O'Brien or something, cause he actually asked a great question today:
http://readingisforsnobs.blogspot.com/2012/10/david-gregory-wins-award-for-best.html
I've been waiting for someone, ANYONE in the mainstream media to point this shit out.
US Presidential Foreign Policy Debate |OT| Devoid of charm. Mildly offensive.
During a fundraiser on Saturday, Missouri’s Republican Senate candidate Todd Akin again garnered attention for his word choice — this time when illustrating his argument that his opponent, Sen. Claire McCaskill brings back taxes and red tape from Washington D.C.
“She goes to Washington, D.C., it’s a little bit like one of those dogs, you know ‘fetch,’” Akin said. “She goes to Washington, D.C., and get all of these taxes and red tape and bureaucracy and executive orders and agencies and she brings all of this stuff and dumps it on us in Missouri.”
If this guy wins, I just...ugh