Just for two weeks while he directs a movie.
Oh, pfft. That's nothing, then. I've been hearing rumblings that this was gonna be much longer (some even said he was calling it quits).
Just for two weeks while he directs a movie.
The Republican chairman of a congressional oversight committee ordered the State Department on Tuesday to provide documents related to "talking points" prepared for television interviews about the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi.
Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, issued a subpoena ordering 10 current and former State Department officials to hand over "documents and communications" related to the attacks in Libya last September 11, in which four Americans were killed.
The subpoena gives Secretary of State John Kerry a June 7 deadline to provide the material. A State Department spokesman said the department would look at the request and decide how to respond.
Republicans and Democrats have been waging a political battle over the attacks.
Republicans have accused President Barack Obama's administration of covering up details of the assault on the mission out of concern that it could tarnish the Democrat's foreign policy credentials during his re-election campaign.
Democrats dismiss the Republican charges as a politically motivated fishing expedition seeking to discredit Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who is considered a top Democratic presidential contender in 2016.
Many of the cover-up accusations stem from unclassified "talking point" memos from intelligence agencies used to prepare Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, for television talk show appearances on September 16.
In those appearances, Rice suggested the attacks were a spontaneous protest over an anti-Islamic film, rather than a premeditated assault.
'NO ALTERNATIVE'
The Obama administration insists the talking points were based on the best information available at the time. It has since acknowledged that militants linked to al Qaeda were behind the attacks and that there was no demonstration in Benghazi.
The administration also released 100 pages of copied emails earlier this month documenting the genesis of the talking points.
Issa said the State Department had refused multiple requests to voluntarily provide the material he seeks.
The subpoenaed documents include communications to or from William Burns, a deputy secretary of state; Victoria Nuland, a spokeswoman whom Obama has nominated as assistant secretary of state for Europe, and Cheryl Mills, who was counselor and chief of staff for Clinton.
"The State Department has not lived up to the administration's broad and unambiguous promises of cooperation with Congress. Therefore, I am left with no alternative but to compel the State Department to produce relevant documents through a subpoena," Issa said in a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry accompanying the subpoena.
State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell said the department had cooperated with Congress on Benghazi to "an unprecedented degree," including by participating in more than 30 hearings and briefings and sharing more than 25,000 pages of documents.
Ventrell said Kerry and Obama were focused primarily on implementing the recommendations of the board that reviewed the Benghazi attacks and going further to improve security for U.S. diplomats and development workers overseas.
"Beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee...."
Oh God.
"Beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeen..."
Not again. Here it comes!
"BENGHAZIBENGHAZIBENGAZIBENGHAZI"
House committee issues subpoena for Benghazi documents
Not a day goes by...
Twenty children are still dead due to gun violence, but that barely got much of a blip on the radar compared to Benghazi-, IRS-, AP-, Umbrella-. FoxNewsSpying-, NotSalutingGate.
I'm sure Issa has seen the documents and they will reveal nothing that we don't already know.
My faith in government has been shaken by how ridiculous Congress has gotten. The whole thing with Inhofe and Oklahoma wanting federal aid dollars is just yet another example of the bullshit hypocrisy and fundamental issue with how one side of our government works today and it's fucking disheartening.
Having been through Superstorm Sandy and then having to read and hear all of the bullshit from the GOP on funding for the recovery and Boehner's delay of the vote...makes me fucking sick that these bastards now expect the rest of the country to treat them differently and with greater compassion than they showed the people of tri-state area after Sandy.
I have no confidence that we can do amazing things any more.
So, what about gas stations? And restaurants?
You seriously cant go a day without gas?
OK, how about hospitals and police? And gas is important on travel holidays.
I'm sure Issa has seen the documents and they will reveal nothing that we don't already know.
The bolded is exactly what the Republicans want (and has been their entire governing strategy for 30 years). Get elected on the platform of small government claiming, "the government can't do anything right!" and then proceed to make damn sure that the government doesn't do anything right while in office. Blame "big government liberals" and repeat.
Dunno. Emptywheel has been covering Benghazi smartly from the beginning IMO
http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/05/11/petraeus-revenge/
TLDR: Petraeus or someone close to him could be guiding the GOP's hand here (pointing the finger at State, when this was clearly a CIA fuck up), flagging which emails to demand; unfortunately for Petraeus, the GOP fucked up the last batch with blatantly false quotes. Maybe this time they'll handle it better.
Well, I think it sort of back-fired because they lost the youth vote for this generation and it will only get worse over time with the youth vote getting less and less white. And it is during these years that political opinions are usually solidified so all of these young democrats are probably going to be young democrats for life
That whole young people democrat, old people republican is a bunch of BS. Reagan owned the youth vote during the 80s, for example.
"Beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee...."
Oh God.
"Beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeen..."
Not again. Here it comes!
"BENGHAZIBENGHAZIBENGAZIBENGHAZI"
House committee issues subpoena for Benghazi documents
Not a day goes by...
Twenty children are still dead due to gun violence, but that barely got much of a blip on the radar compared to Benghazi-, IRS-, AP-, Umbrella-. FoxNewsSpying-, NotSalutingGate.
Dunno. Emptywheel has been covering Benghazi smartly from the beginning IMO
http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/05/11/petraeus-revenge/
TLDR: Petraeus or someone close to him could be guiding the GOP's hand here (pointing the finger at State, when this was clearly a CIA fuck up), flagging which emails to demand; unfortunately for Petraeus, the GOP fucked up the last batch with blatantly false quotes. Maybe this time they'll handle it better.
Judging by the past two elections, they've lost the female vote, youth vote, Black vote, Hispanic vote, Asian vote, and every other demographic. The only solid Republican voting block is white male, usually above the age of 40. As far as I'm concerned, the teaparty simply hastened/is hastening the demise of GOP. The downside is obviously shitty gerrymandered districts that keep them in office.Well, I think it sort of back-fired because they lost the youth vote for this generation and it will only get worse over time with the youth vote getting less and less white. And it is during these years that political opinions are usually solidified so all of these young democrats are probably going to be young democrats for life
That whole young people democrat, old people republican is a bunch of BS. Reagan owned the youth vote during the 80s, for example.
Can you imagine what the left could have made of Rumsfeld's notes about 9/11 if they were anywhere nearly as organized as rightwing crazies are? That had actual substance. The evidence of war criminality was blatant.
"There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know."
-Donald Rumsfeld
#GOPwordstoliveby
After Hanford Republican Andy Vidak posted a convincing victory Tuesday over Bakersfield Democrat Leticia Perez in a 16th state Senate special election, Democrats were hoping history can repeat itself -- and Republicans were calculating how to solidify Vidak's future.
Vidak, who still was enjoying his win Wednesday, said he had yet to think much about how he'd go about his work over the next 18 months.
"A smile and a handshake, that's where we have to start," he said.
Vidak said he talked on the phone Wednesday with Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, the top Democrat. He said the conversation was good.
"He congratulated me," Vidak said. "He said we ran a good campaign."
There are still around 6,500 absentee and provisional ballots left to count in the district, which covers all of Kings County and parts of Kern, Tulare and Fresno counties.
But Perez -- or the three other candidates who ran -- would have to win slightly more than two-thirds of the outstanding ballots to push Vidak below the 50% threshold, which would force a July 23 runoff.
Even Perez acknowledged that was impossible, conceding the race to Vidak.
"I want to congratulate Andy Vidak on winning this hard-fought race," she said in a written statement.
In a stunning turnaround that caught the Valley political world completely off guard, Hanford Republican Andy Vidak -- the apparent winner in a 16th state Senate District special election -- will now likely face a runoff.
It was a task seen as all but impossible -- but that's exactly what happened.
On Friday, the new count showed Vidak at 49.8%, Perez at 43.8% and Francisco "Frank" Ramirez, Paulina Miranda and Mohammad Arif splitting the remaining 6.4%.
Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/2013/05/28/3317544/its-all-but-official-vidak-perez.html#storylink=cpyIt's all but official: Bakersfield Democrat Leticia Perez and Hanford Republican Andy Vidak will face off in a July 23 runoff to see which one will take over the vacant 16th District state Senate seat.
Both Kern and Tulare counties certified their election results on Tuesday, and Kings County election officials said they were finished counting, though the county has yet to certify the election.
But it is almost a certainty that Vidak won't get enough Fresno County votes to go above the 50% threshold and win the May 21 election outright in the battle to replace Bakersfield Democrat Michael Rubio, who resigned in February.
At this point, he is 87 votes short of crossing that point. But the 50% is a moving number, and the real number of votes he needs is actually around 175.
Oh boy, exactly what we need another female, minority liberal in COngress. Yippee!
Perez ran a horrible campaign. After the terrible platform of raising the minimum wage, what does she do for an encore? Increase welfare benefits for married gay couples while giving free college tuition to their undocumented adopted child after they get a free mortgage pay down on the home where they nightly burn the US flag?
The failure of todays government to solve Americas problems is almost unreal, Dole said. We werent perfect by a long shot but at least we got our work done.
He criticized the Republican Party, saying, I think they ought to put a sign on the national committee doors that says closed for repairs until New Years Day next year and spend that time going over ideas and positive agendas.
Ironically, that's the wisest thing Donald Rumsfeld has ever said. It's true. What he didn't say was that among the known knowns was that he was going to commit war crimes with impunity.
Have you seen that Bob Dole interview? He's salty as fuck and is bitch-slapping the GOP hard.
Have you seen that Bob Dole interview? He's salty as fuck and is bitch-slapping the GOP hard.
Read more: http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/2...teran-republican-proud-american#ixzz2UeXCz7uK
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/2...y-interview-veteran-republican-proud-american
All well he should. He's pissed that the GOP nuts bailed on a Disabilities Treaty based on his ADA because of crazy-ass UN conspiracy theory nonsense.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=502782
Additional scrutiny of conservative organizations activities by the IRS did not solely originate in the agencys Cincinnati office, with requests for information coming from other offices and often bearing the signatures of higher-ups at the agency, according to attorneys representing some of the targeted groups. At least one letter requesting information about one of the groups bears the signature of Lois Lerner, the suspended director of the IRS Exempt Organizations department in Washington.
Jay Sekulow, an attorney representing 27 conservative political advocacy organizations that applied to the Internal Revenue Service for tax-exempt status, provided some of the letters to NBC News. He said the groups contacts with the IRS prove that the practices went beyond a few front line employees in the Cincinnati office, as the IRS has maintained.
We've dealt with 15 agents, including tax law specialists -- that's lawyers -- from four different offices, including (the) Treasury (Department) in Washington, D.C., Sekulow said. So the idea that this is a couple of rogue agents in Cincinnati is not correct.
Among the letters were several that bore return IRS addresses other than Cincinnati, including "Department of the Treasury / Internal Revenue Service / Washington, D.C.," and the signatures of IRS officials higher up the chain. Two letters with "Department of the Treasury / Internal Revenue Service / Washington, D.C." letterhead were signed by "Tax Law Specialist(s)" from Exempt Organizations Technical Group 1 and Technical Group 2. Lerners signature, which appeared to be a stamp rather than an actual signature, appeared on a letter requesting additional information from the Ohio Liberty Council Corp.
Lerner has become one of the public faces of the controversy after refusing to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee last Wednesday, citing her Constitutional Fifth Amendment rights after reading a brief statement: I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws, violated IRS regulations or provided false information to this or any other committee.
http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_new...ive-groups-letters-show?lite&ocid=msnhp&pos=2Two IRS Cincinnati employees who have talked to NBC News dispute one part of the IRS explanation, saying that application of inappropriate selection criteria and the extra scrutiny for Tea Party and other conservative political advocacy organizations was not the work of a few low-level rogue employees.
But they also have told NBC News that they believe there was no political or partisan motivation for the targeting or scrutiny.
"We're outstanding public servants, dedicated to our craft and to the public we serve, said one current IRS Cincinnati employee contacted at home over the weekend, who agreed to speak to NBC News on the condition of anonymity. To suggest that we're 'rogue' should be considered slander.
Asked about the motivations for the targeting, the employee said, I trust my management team."
Bonnie Esrig, a 38-year IRS veteran and a manager in the Cincinnati office until she retired from the IRS in January, also has told NBC News that decisions about how to handle cases came from management, and that all employees were subjected to considerable oversight. She also said that she believes there was no political or partisan motivation for the added scrutiny.
It slightly bothers me that people make fun of that statement. The underlying idea isn't wrong, it's just poorly worded.
"There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know."
-Donald Rumsfeld
#GOPwordstoliveby
Some Republicans think the president has become distracted from the deficit by intensified public controversies over the attack on the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya, the Internal Revenue Service's targeting of Tea Party groups and the Justice Departments investigation of The Associated Press.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...-being-wined-and-dined-by-obama#ixzz2Uf5aDPCj
It slightly bothers me that people make fun of that statement. The underlying idea isn't wrong, it's just poorly worded.
Yeah, it's moot when the onus is on the positive claim.Likewise "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence", although Rumsfeld didn't originate that. Really pithy way to put a useful point, even if it turns out to be necessarily false if you're reading it literally.
I now present to you The Greatest Thread in Poli-GAF History!!!
On one hand I'm glad she'll be out of Congress, hopefully forever.I now present to you The Greatest Thread in Poli-GAF History!!!
I now present to you The Greatest Thread in Poli-GAF History!!!
Bachmann gone!?!?!
Only two possible reasons:
1.) She broke the law and is expecting to get charged.
2.) She got a lucrative offer elsewhere to peddle her brand of crazy rightwing-ism.
So an "ethics investigation" forces Bachmann out? I wonder if it was ordered by the same folks who initiated the targeting of conservative groups at the IRS.
So an "ethics investigation" forces Bachmann out? I wonder if it was ordered by the same folks who initiated the targeting of conservative groups at the IRS.
Bachmann is gone! YES!!!!!
Let's make the most of it, then.we've still got more than a year with her left
Bachmann is gone! YES!!!!!
Obligatory
She's just going to troll like Palin does.
We haven't seen the last of her, that's for sure. But I'm surprised people even like her.
Is there anyone on the "left" that's unlikable as her? Michael Moore maybe?
She's just going to troll like Palin does.
We haven't seen the last of her, that's for sure. But I'm surprised people even like her.
Is there anyone on the "left" that's unlikable as her? Michael Moore maybe?