A loss is a loss.I wouldn't call winning the popular vote in 2000 getting 'rekt'.
I don't even know what you're getting at by responding to my post with this. Did you misunderstand my post?
or Obama a particularly "non-regular" candidate, unless we're speaking in CODES
If that's what you take from 2004 and 2000 your completely wrong.
And you really think radical leftists will win on the local level? The fact this even has to be argued is frankly insane
A loss is a loss.
That will help a lot.Hillary won all 6 casino site caucuses according to MSNBC.
Do we know? Was it the same 70/30 ratio at all 6 sites?Hillary won all 6 casino site caucuses according to MSNBC.
Hillary won all 6 casino site caucuses according to MSNBC.
I doubt it but if it is then it's a large cushion. Winning all 6 is a big enough cushion as is.Do we know? Was it the same 70/30 ratio at all 6 sites?
I'm not putting to much stock in those. I can't imagine they had too many Spanish speakers. And again younger ones tend bernieso chuck todd just said the hispanic entrance poll numbers would be a giant upset (in bernies favor) if they pan out -- and then didn't give any numbers. wtf
Hillary killed it at Caesars and the other casinos
The idea that Obama was some sort of "outsider" candidate is insane.
He had been groomed to eventually run for years.
Yes, dems got rekt. If you got an advantage like that and you manage to lose? Dude, you fucked up. Royally.A loss is a loss. That's not what you said. A loss is not 'getting rekt'.
The party was looking at him once he started wrecking face in 2004. But he didn't decide for presidency until 2006 at the earliest (I have a "Obama 2006" button from the party, lol). But once he gave that speech, the party knew they had a superstar on their hands.
Yes, dems got rekt. If you got an advantage like that and you manage to lose? Dude, you fucked up. Royally.
And once they knew he could win then he gained backing from the big bad establishment types like Ted Kennedy.The party was looking at him once he started wrecking face in 2004. But he didn't decide for presidency until 2006 at the earliest (I have a "Obama 2006" button from the party, lol). But once he gave that speech, the party knew they had a superstar on their hands.
You should look up 84 and 88 if you want to what rekt looks like. It's also a good example of what happens when you go too far left for the country.
No let's pretend winning more votes after 8 years in office is getting wrecked because an uncommonly popular president who couldn't run had high approval ratingsYou should look up 84 and 88 if you want to what rekt looks like. It's also a good example of what happens when you go too far left for the country.
And who, pray tell, argued that going far left is the solution?You should look up 84 and 88 if you want to what rekt looks like. It's also a good example of what happens when you go too far left for the country.
No, lets pretend that democrats didn't horrendously fuck up before when going for the safest choice.No let's pretend winning more votes after 8 years in office is getting wrecked because an uncommonly popular president who couldn't run had high approval ratings
After that speech everyone knew it was only a matter of time.
You should look up 84 and 88 if you want to what rekt looks like. It's also a good example of what happens when you go too far left for the country.
1988 was Atwater murdering Dukakis, a different Dem could have done better if they were nasty ( "vote for Cuomo not the Homo" comes to mind for a tougher liberal, if still not great at campaigning overall).
Lol Bernie supporters handing out literature saying he'll end racism.
This whole argument is about Sanders.And who, pray tell, argued that going far left is the solution?
No, lets pretend that democrats didn't horrendously fuck up before when going for the safest choice.
Fucksake
Lol Bernie supporters handing out literature saying he'll end racism.
23% now reporting. Result flips. Big fat mistake.
Guardian has the most LIVE-est results and cool graphics
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...lina-live-results-primary-caucuses?CMP=twt_gu
1988 was Atwater murdering Dukakis, a different Dem could have done better if they were nasty ( "vote for Cuomo not the Homo" if better executed comes to mind for a tougher liberal, if still not great at campaigning overall).
Fuck my $5.Not sure why but PredictIt just went from ~53% Clinton to ~80% Clinton.