If Ossoff prevents a runoff, Dems are primed to shoot the moon in '18.Idk if it's been posted but NYT has an article on the Ossoff GA-6 race:
Why Democrats Have a Shot in a Georgia District Dominated by Republicans
If Ossoff prevents a runoff, Dems are primed to shoot the moon in '18.Idk if it's been posted but NYT has an article on the Ossoff GA-6 race:
Why Democrats Have a Shot in a Georgia District Dominated by Republicans
North Korea is scary as fuck and is the biggest threat to global stability. It won't even be nukes at least at first that draws everything into chaos. NK has an insane amount of artillery pointed at Seoul. That's how it would all start. Essentially a destruction of Seoul, drawing SK allies to fight a ground war, then the nukes would start going off.
I still don't see why they would do it though other than complete insanity. They would be wiped off the map, again. The US pretty much bombed them to oblivion 60+ years ago. Not sure why they would want to do it all again.
I think his reading ability limits him on that front.He really needs to get better at the teleprompter. He was practically giving a report in third grade at times.
CNN is alright. I get why they have pundits on all networks do. Lord will be flipping out tonight and the others probably during Cooper.
Jake Tappers show will be amazing probably sadly can't watch at work.
If Ossoff prevents a runoff, Dems are primed to shoot the moon in '18.
I'm getting a minor in math and I have no idea what that graph is trying to say still.
Republicans were pushing for a repeal and/or a replacement for years, but once they got into power many of them got cold feet.
I am skeptical of a single-payer system passing in Congress. Once the details about the increase in taxes( which is likely) comes out, I think it may not be very popular and the Dems will get cold feet. I think the Democrats will devolve into infighting similar to how the Republicans did. Although, it would be more about the details of the bill, I think.
The Burr presser today was the most promising thing from the entire Russia story yet. Amazing how a sober commitment to following the intelligence can be mollifying.
I've completely lost track of all this Russia stuff going on. There's been so much info at once I don't know what to expect.
Can anyone offer a summary or something?
FBI Director James Comey attempted to go public as early as the summer of 2016 with information on Russias campaign to influence the U.S. presidential election, but Obama administration officials blocked him from doing so, two sources with knowledge of the matter tell Newsweek.
Well before the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence accused the Russian government of tampering with the U.S. election in an October 7 statement, Comey pitched the idea of writing an op-ed about the Russian campaign during a meeting in the White Houses situation room in June or July.
He had a draft of it or an outline. He held up a piece of paper in a meeting and said, I want to go forward, what do people think of this? says a source with knowledge of the meeting, which included Secretary of State John Kerry, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, the Department of Homeland Securitys director and the national security adviser.
Read more: FBI director confirms probe into possible Trump-Russia ties
The other national security leaders didnt like the idea, and White House officials thought the announcement should be a coordinated message backed by multiple agencies, the source says. An op-ed doesnt have the same stature, it comes from one person.
FBI Director James Comey Tried to Reveal Russian Tampering Months Before Election
http://www.newsweek.com/fbi-director-james-comey-russian-tampering-election-576417
Thanks, Obama.
If NK did anything in that region, China would probably take care of them first, no?
Except Obama's not wrong. Trump had shown even at that point in the year that he could deflect anything coming from one source, which Comey's reveal/Op-Ed would have been.FBI Director James Comey Tried to Reveal Russian Tampering Months Before Election
http://www.newsweek.com/fbi-director-james-comey-russian-tampering-election-576417
Thanks, Obama.
FBI Director James Comey Tried to Reveal Russian Tampering Months Before Election
http://www.newsweek.com/fbi-director-james-comey-russian-tampering-election-576417
Thanks, Obama.
FBI Director James Comey Tried to Reveal Russian Tampering Months Before Election
http://www.newsweek.com/fbi-director-james-comey-russian-tampering-election-576417
Thanks, Obama.
Anyone? Just to give me an idea of what's going on as of now?
Well listening to the report on North Korea on NPR was terrifying.
I wonder if the fat dictator will start a nuclear holocaust? Thankfully trump is on the case to stop him (lol)
It's even weirder because you don't have to skew the data in such a stupid way to make the point! It's just "white people are dying at the same rates from non-"deaths of despair" while those metrics are improving for black people, but white deaths due to "deaths of despair" are rising at a rapid and disturbing pace. No need to try and make it look like white people die more from heart disease necessary!I've seen student work that went for something similar. I think the goal is to zoom in on both trends to get less smoothing so you can make some argument. It's not even that bad to do the double axis since you may be arguing for the rates of change between the two groups being different, but to zoom in so much is dishonest. When students do it, it's because they wanted their data to show something at all, while that data there seems to just mostly hold steady.
I've seen student work that went for something similar. I think the goal is to zoom in on both trends to get less smoothing so you can make some argument. It's not even that bad to do the double axis since you may be arguing for the rates of change between the two groups being different, but to zoom in so much is dishonest. When students do it, it's because they wanted their data to show something at all, while that data there seems to just mostly hold steady.
I don't think single payer should be the rallying cry for this reason. We should just say UHC is the goal; the method isn't even that important. We should bank our opposition on "when we get our bill made, the CBO is going to say we'll get the insured rate up to >90%!!" or something. This current situation should be a learning exercise for us.
Eh i need to watch it still but i saw a snip and it was him with a smirk on his face as he said that the investigation scope did NOT include the incentives for Russia to do what they are doing and why Trump never says a negative thing about them. Burr is a shitbag and was completely in the Trump bag last year. This is an act of theatrics to make this appear bi-partisan.
People hated Hillary so much it probably would have slid off along with his fucking sexual assault charges which I kid you not some Republicans don't even remember
Dumb question but why not just graph the derivatives if you're trying to compare the derivatives
It's even weirder because you don't have to skew the data in such a stupid way to make the point! It's just "white people are dying at the same rates from non-"deaths of despair" while those metrics are improving for black people, but white deaths due to "deaths of despair" are rising at a rapid and disturbing pace. No need to try and make it look like white people die more from heart disease necessary!
Do yourself a favor and watch it before you comment on it.
Yeah im a bit more positive on it after watching. At least these guys are better actors at it. The D standing up there certainly was eager to keep throwing bones about shit. And they didnt really beat around the bush when it came to just confronting the fact Trump himself might have been guilty. Also positive because FBI is still doing their thing. This intel thing is like the public dumbed down version of that. It is literally a mechanism to slowly manipulate the public and bring them information that doesnt cause the diehard trumpets head to explode, but rather let them slowly see the light.
I have a feeling the entire collective of Nunes actions, statements, and video is going to be compiled and used in the future as a, "This is how people who don't usually commit crimes act when they've been caught committing a crime" lesson.
FBI Director James Comey Tried to Reveal Russian Tampering Months Before Election
http://www.newsweek.com/fbi-director-james-comey-russian-tampering-election-576417
Thanks, Obama.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...sh-really-thought-of-trumps-inauguration.htmlaccording to three people who were present, Bush gave a brief assessment of Trumps inaugural after leaving the dais: That was some weird shit. All three heard him say it.
Comey tried to reveal Russian plot before election Obama administration officials blocked: report
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/03/com...ction-obama-administration-officials-blocked/
They were so goddamn sure Hillary would win.
SMFH. All the evils that might have been avoided had some folks been braver than they were afraid of being called partisan.
Bradd Jaffy @BraddJaffy
More
"That was some weird shit." — George W. Bush's reaction to Trump's inaugural address, 3 sources tell @yashar
Trump winning the election but then being brought down by Comey after running the government incompetently for however many months would probably end up being better for the Democrats in the long run.
Brian Klaas‏Verified account
@brianklaas
Days before dropping to 35% approval rating:
Obama: Never
W Bush: 1,927
Clinton: Never
HW Bush: 1,278
Reagan: Never
Carter: 840
Ha! That's funny!Damn you dubya you're making it hard to remember how awful you were
Trump winning the election but then being brought down by Comey after running the government incompetently for however many months would probably end up being better for the Democrats in the long run.
If this is as big as everyone thinks it is, the entire Republican party is fucked. They'd have nothing to fall back on because they also proved to be utterly unprepared to govern.
Obama still wins, the only big downsides is SCOTUS and whatever irreversible actions Trump has put in place.
According to a 2015 study by Texas A&M University for the National Milk Producers Federation, immigrant labour makes up 51 per cent of the dairy industry's workforce. Removing those workers, the report says, would lead to milk prices increasing 90 per cent and cost the U.S. economy more than $32 billion.
Trump has shown that running on white supremacist fascism and contempt for democracy is a winning strategy, and hurt many people in his short time in office. 2018 and 2020 alone can't offset that long term damage. This fight is only beginning.
There will absolutely be long term damage but if the Dems capitalize on all of this the right way, they'll win everything back. It's there for the taking. Trump is the worst President in American history even if none of this Russia shit ever happened.
Man how the hell did Truman get below Nixon?Past Gallup lows: http://www.gallup.com/opinion/pollin...campaign=tiles
Trump: 35%*
Obama: 38%
W: 25%
Clinton: 37%
HW: 29%
Reagan: 35%
Carter: 28%
Ford: 37%
Nixon: 24%
LBJ: 35%
Kennedy: 56%
Eisenhower: 48%
Truman: 22%
Trump has shown that running on white supremacist fascism and contempt for democracy is a winning strategy, and hurt many people in his short time in office. 2018 and 2020 alone can't offset that long term damage. This fight is only beginning.
The fact that Trump even got as far as he did is enough proof that running on such a platform is a viable strategy. He didn't need to win for the next Republican candidate run the exact same platform but without the insanity he offered.
Assuming the USA gets out of this presidency without some military coup or something, its probably better in the long run for the USA if only because I have zero doubt that Hillary Clinton would have been a single term president in such a hostile congress and they wouldn't be in the process of positively rebuilding their foundations.
The sheer visceral reaction that a lot of white America had towards black people simply asking police officers to be held accountable for killing people is enough proof that racism and authoritarianism was already popular or acceptable among a lot of Americans. Trump winning didn't suddenly make these things popular...it was always popular, particularly on the internet, and Trump is really just the end result.
Sometimes I think back at this and I'm just so shocked. I almost have a panic attack. The President once said he wanted to grab a married woman..well you know the quote.his fucking sexual assault charges which I kid you not some Republicans don't even remember
Man how the hell did Truman get below Nixon?