Randolph Freelander
Member
It gets better. Trump has only been president for 11 weeks (as of tomorrow).
You can't expect the President to be able to count and make America great at the same time. It's one or the other. Priorities, people!
It gets better. Trump has only been president for 11 weeks (as of tomorrow).
Also, why does Putin want to protect Assad? Forgive my ignorance.
Trump believes he's going to get 5 appointees in 8 years? Let alone probably 4 years? Uhh... okay. Is he planning on gassing the Supreme Court building or something?
In his quest to lead Russia back to its Soviet Union glory, Putin protects Assad to gain influence in the Middle East and beyond. He's also propping up the Taliban in Afghanistan and a warlord in Libya, both in direct opposition to the West's interests in the region.
With less than a week to go until election day, the national Republican Party has stepped into Kansas 4th District race, spending $92,000 supporting Republican Ron Estes and opposing his Democratic rival James Thompson, federal forms show.
The National Republican Congressional Committee on Wednesday purchased $67,111 worth of television advertising from KSN, KWCH, KAKE and KSAS stations in the Wichita TV market, according to a disclosure form filed by KSNW-TV.
The money is being used to run an attack-ad blitz on Thompson in the closing days of the campaign.
Also on Wednesday, the NRCC filed a daily expenditure report with the Federal Election Commission showing $25,000 for digital advertising going to FP1 Strategies, a Washington campaign consulting firm whose slogan is We win the tough ones.
The 25,000 was split evenly on digital campaigning, half going to support Estes and half going to oppose Thompson, the filing showed.
The expenditures are independent, meaning the money and ad content do not flow through Estes campaign.
Were happy to help in this small way and show our support for Ron Estes, NRCC spokesman Matt Gorman said in an e-mail. We look forward to Ron coming to Congress and standing up for Kansas values.
A spokesman for the Thompson campaign said the expenditures show national Republicans have hit the panic button in the race.
There are people in Washington who are very concerned about Ron Estes performance in this election, said Chris Pumpelly. They would not be doing this if this were in hand for Estes.
Estes campaign spokesman could not be reached for comment.
Estes and Thompson are running in a special election Tuesday to fill the open congressional seat vacated by former Rep. Mike Pompeo.
Pompeo, who won his fourth congressional term in the November election, resigned in January to accept President Trumps nomination as director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
The Wichita-centered 4th District includes voters in 17 counties in south-central Kansas. Libertarian Chris Rockhold is also in the race.
Wichita political analysts differ on what the last-quarter intervention might mean about the race.
Kenneth Ciboski, who recently retired as a political science professor at Wichita State University, said he thinks the primary reason for the late Republican expenditure is for the national campaign committee to cover their bases for the future
Its likely Estes will be the winner, and the committee wants to be on his good side, said Ciboski, who is active in Republican politics.
If someday the committee wants Estes help in campaigning or fund-raising, He cant say You didnt support me, Ciboski said.
Ciboski added that while he thinks an Estes win is likely, I think this race may be a lot closer than people think.
Russell Arben Fox, a professor of political science at Friends University who is active in Democratic politics, said he thinks the spending could mean that national Republicans are worried about the special election.
He said that party registration and other traditional factors favor Estes and a win by Thompson would be an upset.
But, he said, Thompson has a more energized base of support in what is expected to be a low-turnout election.
Thompsons campaign has had a more robust presence on the Web and social media than Estes, Fox said. And, he said Thompson supporters seem to be younger and more tech- and social-media savvy than Estes supporters.
On its web site, FP1 touts services including compelling content on social and email to raise money, educate voters and drive activism, as well as around-the-clock social media monitoring to track and get-ahead of emerging trends.
Fox said he doesnt think the Republican committee would really need to do Estes any favors to assure his ongoing party loyalty.
Hes very much someone out of Kansas Republican central casting whod be unlikely to buck the national party in any case, Fox said.
what the fuck is wrong with the pro-Assad "left"?
What's the matter with Kansas?
y'all ready for the return of plains populism, let's get a new Cross of Gold speech ready
Interestingly, it seems somewhat common for some parts of the left to be fine with dictators. I guess it has something to do with middle eastern wars and the stuff we done during the Cold War.
Looking at their Facebook page, the Wichita DSA was working with Thompson which is kind of interesting/surprising. He also got the Our Revolution endorsement, which is fine/good but he doesn't really seem like a leftie.Man Trump would be a fucking idiot if Ossoff, Quist, and Thompson all won.
Looking at their Facebook page, the Wichita DSA was working with Thompson which is kind of interesting/surprising. He also got the Our Revolution endorsement, which is fine/good but he doesn't really seem like a leftie.
McCain and Romney will be able to share their collective lack of spine.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/04/utahsen-mitt-romney/522096/
Romney gonna run for the Senate in Utah in 2018.
At least it isn't MA so we don't have to deal with that headache.
Regime change in Syria counts as "non-interventionist", right?
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/04/utahsen-mitt-romney/522096/
Romney gonna run for the Senate in Utah in 2018.
At least it isn't MA so we don't have to deal with that headache.
It would be the easiest Senate bid in the history of the United States of America
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/04/utahsen-mitt-romney/522096/
Romney gonna run for the Senate in Utah in 2018.
At least it isn't MA so we don't have to deal with that headache.
Well like a quick look at the Atlanta DSA's website makes basically no mentions of Ossoff. They don't usually get too invested in electoral politics unless it's one of their own members (they just won a city council seat in Rock Island, IL yesterday, and look likely to get a member elected to the South Fulton, GA city council) or a more explicitly social democratic/socialist candidate and instead seem to focus on activism. It might just be a chapter-by-chapter thing since they exploded in growth.He has a D next to his name. Might as well be a socialist here.
Not that it matters, but has Romney ever lived in Utah? I assume he has a ski palace there. Did he live there for the Olympic bid or something?Yea, it would be. It's his for the taking.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/04/utahsen-mitt-romney/522096/
Romney gonna run for the Senate in Utah in 2018.
At least it isn't MA so we don't have to deal with that headache.
Normally I'd say he's got no chance being a carpetbagger, but that seat is likely his for the taking.
He has a D next to his name. Might as well be a socialist here.
Evan McMullin should run. Or at least gun for Chaffetz's seat.
Scott Brown will probably run against him.
I have a feeling if McMullin got elected to congress he'd be like McCain. He already said he doesn't actually oppose most of Trump's agenda. Getting rid of Chaffetz would be good though.
"and leading critic of Donald Trump"https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/04/utahsen-mitt-romney/522096/
Romney gonna run for the Senate in Utah in 2018.
At least it isn't MA so we don't have to deal with that headache.
Catering to white working class voters, apparently.serious question: when we're talking that Dems need to be more/less populist, what does "populism" even mean in today's political environment?
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/04/utahsen-mitt-romney/522096/
Romney gonna run for the Senate in Utah in 2018.
At least it isn't MA so we don't have to deal with that headache.
They never admitted you were right did they..I am not a DSA member because I got into a fight with the LA chapter when they were being stupid and I won.
Can someone give me a summary of what happened today? I feel like a lot of shit went down.
They never admitted you were right did they..
Can someone give me a summary of what happened today? I feel like a lot of shit went down.
Surprised you didn't just spam on their page till they blocked you or somethingThey stopped responding. So I won.
We came, we saw.
We nuked the judicial filibuster.
We then decided to flip course in the matter of a week with Syria.
We're on the fuck Assad train now, no clue how long.
OH! Also Nunes stepped down from the House Intel Committee.
Instead giving it to the guy who needed basic logic lessons from Comey.
Nunes is out.
Bannon keeps calling Kushner a cuck and globalist.
Turtle nuked the filibuster.
"Something should happen" in Syria / with Assad.
.
Also Twitter v TrumpNunes is out.
Bannon keeps calling Kushner a cuck and globalist.
Turtle nuked the filibuster.
"Something should happen" in Syria / with Assad.
Also Twitter v Trump
Take less money from big corporations and talk a lot about how much they've fucked is over.serious question: when we're talking that Dems need to be more/less populist, what does "populism" even mean in today's political environment?
I lol'd
He already showed he had more spine than literally every elected Republican official (and plenty of national review-type GOP'ers) by running for president as an independent. As far as Utah goes, a sane small-government conservative with integrity is a big upgrade over, well, every GOPer.
So if Trump were to be impeached, would Gorsuch find himself under investigation? I'm just curious what happens to the people a president picks when the president themselves get impeached.
So if Trump were to be impeached, would Gorsuch find himself under investigation? I'm just curious what happens to the people a president picks when the president themselves get impeached.
Nothing would happen to Gorsuch.
Supreme Court is for life.
Whoever replaces trump could decide to clean house on his cabinet, etc though.
So there's no constitutional framework in place for a bad supreme court judge?
I guess the notion is that what is or isn't "bad" is extremely subjective, so just removing a SC judge because you dislike their perspective/beliefs would be a huge slippery slopeSo there's no constitutional framework in place for a bad supreme court judge?