Random Human
They were trying to grab your prize. They work for the mercenary. The masked man.
Didn't this story come out a week or so ago? Otherwise a very similar one did.
Same story, different aide.
lol
Didn't this story come out a week or so ago? Otherwise a very similar one did.
Harris and Gillibrand have absolutely nothing to be worried about with regards to name recognition this far out.
See the thing is Sr and Clinton were sane and within normalcy of American politics. How well will drain the swamp play when he has no legislative victories of note come 2020? And I really think this will be the case, Trump won't get to sign a bill on anything he's pushed for or if he does it won't resemble what he promised. That he was able to fuck up Obamacare repeal, something that the GOP base is rabid about and actually really wanted shows me this.
Trump will keep deteriorating in the office, Charlottesville was such an easy punt that he fucked that up means the real crisis will be even worse...way worse. At some point he will lose some of his base. 2 years in shit like build that wall and lock her up and whatever else they chant at those rallies will have less sway.
Entangles Sessions too since he worked for Sessions at the time.This has the potential to be a massive story.
Should @CNN be declared a terrorist organization?
(Hint: They should)
The society we are fighting for has to be free from all oppression. From an economic standpoint, you cannot have democratic economies unless the society at that time also works towards eliminating all forms of oppression: misogyny, racism, discrimination against native people, sexual violence. All of this has to be part and parcel of the agenda, as far as the vision that I am fighting for.
We dont believe that we will be able to build a revolutionary movement without engaging with mass numbers of people on the ground on the issues that they are organizing around. We took up fifteen dollars an hour Socialist Alternative didnt invent that demand. It was a political and economic demand that was being raised by low-wage workers themselves. We took it up not because we believe that fifteen dollars an hour will cure all ills, but because thats a demand that a mass number of workers are willing to come together, get organized, and fight for.
But I dont think you can achieve any of this without bringing together people of different races, different genders, and in reality, its a two-way thing. You cannot fight for economic justice without also being a fighter against black oppression or against racism, against misogyny, against sexual inequality. On the other hand, if your goal is to end racism, were not going to be able to do that on the basis of capitalism. The logic of the capitalist system is such that if youre fighting racism, it forces you to reach anticapitalist conclusions.
Two things, in my view, that are important to recognize, are that you cannot just fold one into the other. You cannot fold economic democracy into saying, Lets fight for black freedom and well find our way to economic democracy. And you cannot fight for economic democracy and say, Well get black freedom along the way.
You cannot reject anybodys starting point to radicalization. The Black Lives Matter movement is an incredible indicator of the times we live in: that after almost fifty years, we have the beginnings of a black freedom movement.
Her and Lipinski, anyway.
Edit: that GOP Zelda thing is dumber than it looks
It's not even like they only entered the video game business in 85. Certainly some of these old farts remember Donkey Kong and Mario Brothers?That's alright, they're off by a friggin century. Not that big a deal you know.
What is with this CNN obsession?
CLINTON
NEWS
NETWORK
Because MSNBC is the other major news network that doesn't really even try to play to the middle or right. They are a solid liberal network
I think Harris has a lot more name recognition than most candidates this early in the game. She's doing a very good job promoting her brand in ways that aren't obvious or selfish.
How well-known was Obama in 2005? I saw his DNC speech as a kid but didn't hear about him again until 2007.
Because of political fanfiction sold as preparing for a worst case scenario.Why are you people talking about Tulsi Gabbard again, Jesus Christ
Nobody gets to 270 in part due to a surprising result in Utah and the House delivers us President McMuffin.Garland/Abramson 2020 with Louise Mensch as SecState, Dem dream ticket
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nat..._Democratic_Party_2008_presidential_primaries
While this doesn't directly answer the name recognition question, it does tell us some things. It looks like the first poll that included him was in December 2005, finding him at 7%. He doesn't start to be regularly included until late in 2006, where he typically polls second behind Clinton.
I don't have a good sense of his name recognition with the average American at the time, but he was certainly regarded as a rising star in Democratic circles.
https://newrepublic.com/minutes/144481/trump-defectors-enough-gimmicky-resignation-letters
Glad someone finally said it. IMPEACH, RESIST, etc. is so embarrassing and juvenile.
Why are you people talking about Tulsi Gabbard again, Jesus Christ
This.. butBecause of political fanfiction sold as preparing for a worst case scenario.
ThisPigeon if you primary her and win we will never mention her again.
He still watches! Morning is strictly Fox and Friends dough.Probably because Trump likes (or used to like) watching a lot of CNN.
It was a different aide. That one was leaked by Trumps team to argue that nothing happened. They really just have dug their grave even further. Between this story and the GOP senator Russia phone calls with Trump, he is more or less flat out admitting guilt.Didn't this story come out a week or so ago? Otherwise a very similar one did.
He thought he would get away with it...
...but his emails.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/white-house-sets-rules-for-military-transgender-ban-1503534757The White House is expected to send guidance to the Pentagon in coming days on how to implement a new administration ban on transgender people in the military, issuing a policy that will allow Defense Secretary Jim Mattis to consider a service members ability to deploy in deciding whether to kick them out of the military.
The White House memo also directs the Pentagon to deny admittance to transgender individuals and to stop spending on medical treatment regimens for those currently serving, according to U.S. officials familiar with the document.
The 2½-page memo gives Mr. Mattis six months to prepare to fully implement the new ban, according to these officials.
So this seem like it could be a thing.
"Exclusive: Top Trump aide's email draws new scrutiny in Russia inquiry"
http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/23/polit...earborn-email-russia-investigation/index.html
Forbes said:To that end, the Democratic nominee is Jim Justice, who is the billionaire owner of the Greenbrier Resort — the place of presidents and the summer home of the New Orleans Saints. He's also the owner of coal mines he sold to the Russians five years ago for nearly $600 million but which he has recently bought back for $5 million.
Fucking cunt.
Of all the people I expected to be tied up in the Russia scandal, Jim Justice wasn't anywhere near the top 10. But on paper, it makes perfect sense. The only difference between him and Trump was he was a Democrat, and now that's out the window.
@yashar
Yashar Ali �� Retweeted Yashar Ali ��
Re the West Virginia person referenced below, the Governor of WV (who changed parties last month) sold his coal company to a Russian company
Oh... Oh.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kensil...l-industry-in-gubernatorial-bid/#7bed98a95bba
She seems cool. I have nitpicks but, eh, whatever. She seems to be doing very good work. I just wish we could stop with this "industrial-labor-fetishism"-That Meidner plan article on Jacobin was interesting it has lame Star Wars puns.
-Also from Jacobin, Kshama Sawant articulates pretty well how socialists have to focus on not just pure economics but other forms of oppression:
https://jacobinmag.com/2017/08/kshama-sawant-interview-seattle-city-council
Towards the end of the interview she critiques identity politics and that could probably ruffle some feathers but I think it's clear she's just saying it's good but not enough. I'm glad to see a higher profile socialist talking about the importance of intersectionality since the narrative recently had been that socialists don't care about anything but economics.
Wait, sold for $600 million and then bought back for $5 million.
WTF happened?
She seems cool. I have nitpicks but, eh, whatever. She seems to be doing very good work. I just wish we could stop with this "industrial-labor-fetishism"
Wait, sold for $600 million and then bought back for $5 million.
WTF happened?
Could you expand on that last point? I'm not sure if I'm familiar.
Spending $595M to buy off the Governor of Freaking West Virginia doesn't seem like it would be a very good value proposition for the Russians, yet here we are. Were the perhaps confused and thought it was Virginia-Virginia? Even that would be crazy.
She highlights specifically in there that, as disproportionate members of the working class, people of color were disproportionately hit by the post-industrial era ushered in by trade agreements like NAFTA. In the context of the interview its completely sensible, she could have just as well picked the 2008 crisis as an example of a "thing" that tilted the playing field, but it stood out to me because one of the things that drives me the most batty about the Bernie Sanders brand of leftism (which, while she's probably not in complete alignment with, she seems at least pointed in the same direction) is that free trade is a bad idea and trade agreements harm America.
It has a distinctly protectionist flavor, and honestly it smacks of the same logic saying that we should prop up the coal industry so that those workers don't lose jobs; if the coal industry lacked the consequences of pollution (i.e its a "good thing" that industry is dying because its killing us) would that suddenly become a thing that we should do?
Industries change. Economies change. We need to build an expansive and comprehensive system to help people adjust to this, so that families are not plunged into poverty. But like...the money is still here. The US is richer than ever. The emphasis some people place on that specific class of jobs feels like its missing the forest for the trees
Its can also be part of a larger emphasis in some circles of socialism on highly local economies, which I have...mixed feelings on generally
Although I entirely agree it's possible, that's still a really, reeeeally bad value proposition. Like, maybe if Manchin was part of the deal as a pair, but clearly that didn't happen. If Putin would throw more than half a billion at literally the worst state in the country I'd love to know what's been attempted behind the scenes elsewhere! Well, I'm horrified, but I do want to know.Putin's the richest man in the world, worth hundreds of billions of dollars. I'm not saying it happened, but it's in the realm of possibility at this point.
Probably buying his loyalty, more than anything. If he was privy to anything involving Trump and the Russians, he'd need to be silenced, and it's a lot harder to knock off a politician here than in Mother Russia without anyone asking questions.Spending $595M to buy off the Governor of Freaking West Virginia doesn't seem like it would be a very good value proposition for the Russians, yet here we are. Were they perhaps confused and thought it was Virginia-Virginia? Even that would be crazy.
Kyle Griffin‏Verified account
@kylegriffin1
Following
More
.@maddow reports that Chuck Grassley has said he'd likely vote to release the transcript of Glenn Simpson's testimony to the Judiciary Cmte.
6:27 PM - 23 Aug 2017