RustyNails
Member
From Healthcare debate to straight into woke Lemon.
And then force the Virginias and Dakotas to merge into 2 states so we don't fuck up our flag
Seriously it's perfect. 50 is a perfect number. 52 or even god forbid 51 will make my OCD go crazy till the end of time
Canada's a state, right?What about Guam and American Samoa? The Northern Mariana Islands and the US Virgin Islands? We can get that sucker up to 56 easy.
Canada's a state, right?
I'm not down unless we get it up to 100What about Guam and American Samoa? The Northern Mariana Islands and the US Virgin Islands? We can get that sucker up to 56 easy.
I don't hate this guy as much as Sasse in the sleazy faux-moderate camp
why ever not
And then force the Virginias and Dakotas to merge into 2 states so we don't fuck up our flag
Seriously it's perfect. 50 is a perfect number. 52 or even god forbid 51 will make my OCD go crazy till the end of time
Not sure PR would be a lock. There are a lot of conservative Puerto Ricans out there from what I understand."The only reason why the Democratic Party is pushing for statehood for these districts is because they know they'll win the Electoral College votes from them."
"Okay, let's get rid of the Electoral College, turn the Presidential vote into a Popular vote system, and then everyone who votes Republican in DC and PR will have their vote counted,"
See, it's all connected.
Not sure PR would be a lock. There are a lot of conservative Puerto Ricans out there from what I understand.
Just don't ask the Carolinas to unite, please!And then force the Virginias and Dakotas to merge into 2 states so we don't fuck up our flag
Lets just do United States Survivor and vote out shitty states when we get a new one.Re-upping my call for a flag that just has a number instead of a field of stars so that we can easily update it when we add states.
what the fuck is wrong with youRe-upping my call for a flag that just has a number instead of a field of stars so that we can easily update it when we add states.
what the fuck is wrong with you
Re-upping my call for a flag that just has a number instead of a field of stars so that we can easily update it when we add states.
An I the only one who cares about efficiency
I hope in the revolutionary vanguard party you are kept far away from the People's Flag Committee.An I the only one who cares about efficiency
I raise you that with a flag that has this:Re-upping my call for a flag that just has a number instead of a field of stars so that we can easily update it when we add states.
Ban cars.An I the only one who cares about efficiency
There's absolutely no way Puerto Rico would be a red state.
I raise you 4 letters:The most efficient replacement would be a simple symbol, like say a hammer and sickle.
Oh, forgot about that CNN debate tonight.
Did bernie solidify the death of the democratic party for the next decade and ensure the repeal of Obamacare, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security as predicted?
Nobody watched because Lindsaycare died.
Interesting. I was at least expecting it to end with McCain and Rand running on stage in a panic to pledge support for Graham-Cassidy because of their utter disbelief that Sanders would be for single payer.
Rand always finds a way to yes on this shit, he's already working on it.
Rand always finds a way to yes on this shit, he's already working on it.
Always except the bill that this most resembles where he voted no.
Except he said the other day he was willing to entertain a yes vote, signaling that he wasn't going to be the third guy. He may just wind up voting no on this one, but he was never willing to be the vote that killed it. Never.
He's not getting much credit, instead it's the same refrain of repeating what you just posted over and over any time someone talks about him voting.Given his history I have no idea why everyone in here is willing to give him so much credit. When it actually counts he's always found his way to yes, every single time. He's never been the vote to kill something, never.
Voteview says that future also ran Klobuchar is about as liberal or as centrist as Dianne Feinstein and Tim Kaine.
He doesn't need to be the third guy. He can be the fifth or whatever.
Well, I've panicked before about being screwed without donors or "both sides" voters, but I guess someone who governs as a centrist but runs as a progressive might satisfy both of those problems.
The most efficient replacement would be a simple symbol, like say a hammer and sickle.
Except he said the other day he was willing to entertain a yes vote, signaling that he wasn't going to be the third guy. He may just wind up voting no on this one, but he was never willing to be the vote that killed it. Never.
Given his history I have no idea why everyone in here is willing to give him so much credit. When it actually counts he's always found his way to yes, every single time. He's never been the vote to kill something, never.
When was the last time he insisted that he would vote against a bill then voted for it?
Skinny repeal, which he said he got bought off by getting a vote on full repeal that only got like 41 votes yet McCain was somehow a yes on.
https://twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/912515852578246657In dinner w/conservative groups tonight, Trump yet again went off on Sessions for recusing himself from Russia probe, per source in the room
You could feel it dripping with venom, source said. Trump also suggested Sessions was ineffective, told room to tell him to get moving"
https://twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/912515852578246657
Incidentally (or not?), the Senate Judiciary will debate two bipartisan bills meant to protect Mueller's investigation today.
What about a crumb scraper? like a fancy one.I actually wanted at one time to update this with a waiter's wipe cloth but it was really hard to draw.
There really should be a symbol for service workers though! We don't get hammers.
Might want to pass one of those bills. Only a matter of time before Trump tries to make Mueller go away.https://twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/912515852578246657
Incidentally (or not?), the Senate Judiciary will debate two bipartisan bills meant to protect Mueller's investigation today.