but where's Obama?GhaleonEB said:And Biden voted NO.
but where's Obama?GhaleonEB said:And Biden voted NO.
If by 'Republicans' you mean "Barack Obama," then yes.TheKingsCrown said:So essentially the republicans are responsible for this.
TheKingsCrown said:So essentially the republicans are responsible for this.
speculawyer said:Exactly. This whole bit on referencing foreign cases is just far-right jingoism paranoia.
There is nothing wrong with adopting good ideas just because they come from other places. This is just one of those far-right jingoist talking-points that really makes no sense. I'm sure it is also hypocritical because I'm sure there are plenty of examples of conservative judges that cite foreign cases.
trying to find a Delorean so he can travel back in timeso_awes said:but where's Obama?
He was in puberty back then.so_awes said:but where's Obama?
TheKingsCrown said:So essentially the republicans are responsible for this.
It's the PoliGAF thread.Price Dalton said:Must you bring bitter partisan politics into this? Our nation's economy is in a crisis, and all you can do is play games and point fingers.
Price Dalton said:Must you bring bitter partisan politics into this? Our nation's economy is in a crisis, and all you can do is play games and point fingers.
so_awes said:but where's Obama?
Cloudy said:But they ARE responsible...
The Lamonster said:http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/12th-amendment-update-tie-probability.html
So what happens if there is a 269-269 tie? What is the tiebreaker?
The Lamonster said:http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/12th-amendment-update-tie-probability.html
So what happens if there is a 269-269 tie? What is the tiebreaker?
The Lamonster said:http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/12th-amendment-update-tie-probability.html
So what happens if there is a 269-269 tie? What is the tiebreaker?
syllogism said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0908/Were_All_Socialists_Now.html
It will be entertaining to hear all the conservative radio shows spinning this
oh shit Congress actually votes for the president? How do we know Obama would win? Wouldn't it be another tie?Cloudy said:Goes to a vote in Congress. Obama wins..
I just want to know why you're putting things like "volunteer" and "community organizing" in scare-quotes. Is it because you don't know what the terms mean? Or is volunteering for stuff dangerous and unethical in some manner?Price Dalton said:Are you going to believe a former POW or a 1st term Senator who's been padding his resume with typical bleeding-heart "volunteer" work?
Why would it be a tie when democrats have like a 30 seat majority?The Lamonster said:oh shit Congress actually votes for the president? How do we know Obama would win? Wouldn't it be another tie?
The Lamonster said:oh shit Congress actually votes for the president? How do we know Obama would win? Wouldn't it be another tie?
You are. There are far more important things to discuss. This is an election! McCain's on the right track, though. He recognizes that this is a distraction -- one that Obama is capitalizing on, and he's calling a spade a spade.Evlar said:EDIT: And (in this liberal's opinion) economic policy is fair game when discussing politics. Call me crazy.
Price Dalton said:Are you going to believe a former POW or a 1st term Senator who's been padding his resume with typical bleeding-heart "volunteer" work?
And let's be honest, they should know.ryutaro's mama said:Not according to the Republicans.
Steve Youngblood said:You are. There are far more important things to discuss. This is an election! McCain's on the right track, though. He recognizes that this is a distraction -- one that Obama is capitalizing on, and he's calling a spade a spade.
Price Dalton said:Railing blow and "community organizing."
besada said:Youngblood and Astrolad got there before you. There's only so much room for this sort of thing.
Evlar said:I just want to know why you're putting things like "volunteer" and "community organizing" in scare-quotes. Is it because you don't know what the terms mean? Or is volunteering for stuff dangerous and unethical in some manner?
syllogism said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0908/Were_All_Socialists_Now.html
It will be entertaining to hear all the conservative radio shows spinning this
Well, so far it is the only presidential election this century.JCX9 said:House of reps I think. if that happened, that would mean 2004 was the only election decided by democratic means this century.
It's not quite that simple as each state delegation gets one vote, not each representative. I think the 2009 house would break the tie though so democrats would have an even larger majority. Also some states allow Electors to vote against the popular vote.Cheebs said:Why would it be a tie when democrats have like a 30 seat majority?
besada said:Youngblood and Astrolad got there before you. There's only so much room for this sort of thing.
Fragamemnon said:They'll throw the same BS that they always do-that conservatism hasn't failed, only its politicians have failed, and that if we could just get new politicians like Sarah Palin or John McCain in office, conservatism magically solves all ills.
lawblob said:Drudge Report is really getting desperate. The lead right now is about the 'soaring financial markets.' I don't know if I would be celebrating a 400 point gain the same week the Feds nationalized about 10% of the fucking economy! :lol
Steve Youngblood said:You are. There are far more important things to discuss. This is an election! McCain's on the right track, though. He recognizes that this is a distraction -- one that Obama is capitalizing on, and he's calling a spade a spade.
As dumb as the electoral college already is, it's still pretty amazing that they came up with an even number of total votes. WTF.The Lamonster said:http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/12th-amendment-update-tie-probability.html
So what happens if there is a 269-269 tie? What is the tiebreaker?
Conservatism can't fail, if it fails then it wasn't conservatism. See Bush, George W.Fragamemnon said:They'll throw the same BS that they always do-that conservatism hasn't failed, only its politicians have failed, and that if we could just get new politicians like Sarah Palin or John McCain in office, conservatism magically solves all ills.
As Barack Obama and John McCain battle for the Hispanic vote, a leading Latino backer of Hillary Clinton is crossing party lines to support the Republican presidential nominee.
In an interview Thursday, Miguel D. Lausell, a Puerto Rican businessman and longtime Democratic activist and fund-raiser, came out for Sen. McCain. While he said he doesn't agree with all the policy positions of the Republican candidate and his running mate, Sarah Palin, Mr. Lausell added: "I find McCain to be a sound person and a man with a track record. I know where he is coming from." Mr. Lausell had been a major backer of Bill Clinton and served as a senior political adviser to Sen. Clinton's unsuccessful bid this year for the Democratic presidential nomination.
Mr. Lausell said he feels Sen. Obama "doesn't really regard the Hispanic community as important." Sen. Clinton won a large majority of the Hispanic vote in most primaries, and Latino voters are an important bloc in swing states such as Florida, Nevada and New Mexico. Most polls show Sen. Obama leads Sen. McCain among Latinos.
Mr. Lausell said that as a "lifelong Democrat," this is the first time he has supported a Republican presidential candidate. A Harvard Law School graduate, Mr. Lausell's business career has included a stint as chief executive of the Puerto Rico Telephone Co. and chairman of PonceBank, a large Puerto Rican financial institution. Mr. Lausell once had a position with the Democratic National Committee and served on a national finance board for Al Gore's unsuccessful 2000 presidential run. In 2004, he helped start a nonprofit aimed at boosting Latino turnout for Democrats.
Sen. Clinton, for her part, has firmly come out for Sen. Obama and asked her supporters to do the same. While many of her biggest backers have gotten on the Obama bandwagon, numerous others have held back and some have been looking to support Sen. Obama's general-election opponent. Earlier this week, another prominent Clinton supporter, Lynn Forester de Rothschild, declared for the Republican nominee. Other former Clinton backers may be declaring for Sen. McCain in the days ahead, according to someone familiar with the situation.
Public-opinion polls in recent weeks also show that a potentially significant minority of Clinton voters from the primaries still haven't decided whether to vote for Sen. Obama. If the Democratic nominee loses a large number of Clinton voters, it could prove crucial in a close presidential race.
A spokesman for Sen. Obama declined to comment on the move of some Clinton backers to the McCain camp. In recent weeks, the Obama campaign has touted the endorsements of current and former Republican officeholders, including Rep. Wayne Gilchrest of Maryland, former Iowa Rep. Jim Leach and former Rhode Island Sen. Lincoln Chafee.
Mr. Lausell cited several objections he has with Sen. Obama. "The U.S. is in a very difficult situation these days and I don't want someone without experience at the helm," he said. Mr. Lausell said he likes Delaware Sen. Joe Biden, but felt that if Sen. Obama was going to reach inside of Washington for a vice presidential running mate, he should have chosen Sen. Clinton, "who received 18 million votes" during the presidential primaries.
Dude, what were the chances that Barack Obama would be our nominee?MoxManiac said:An electoral tie probably won't happen. Doesn't 538 have the odds of it at like 3 percent or something?
mamacint said:As dumb as the electoral college already is, it's still pretty amazing that they came up with an even number of total votes. WTF.
that's because there are some people here with ideas that crazy (jaydubya)Kildace said:I love how sarcasm never gets picked up in this thread.
GhaleonEB said:McCain just called for the head of the FEC to resign.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/09/19/1424411.aspx
:lol