The Chosen One said:Where are all the 527s?
I know Obama can't play dirty politics due to his brand, but where are all the Dem 527s to do the dirt for him?
The negative politics seems like a one way street the last few weeks. It would be nice if McCain had to deal with frivolious negative ads too. McCain has made so many "gafs" that there's tons of material out there. You gotta give the Repugs credit, they know how to play dirty in a way the Dems seem in capable of doing.
SupahBlah said:527's aren't getting involved because both candidates will call them out on it, or at least that's the fear of the backers so no one wants to start one.
Read a good article on it a few weeks back.
sp0rsk said:Do you think McCain would call them out now?
SupahBlah said:527's aren't getting involved because both candidates will call them out on it, or at least that's the fear of the backers so no one wants to start one.
Read a good article on it a few weeks back.
MSNBC: Joe Scarborough and Pat Buchanan: The Republican Party isn't racist now and neither was the Southern strategy under Nixon. Bob Herbert: Nice try, guys, but I don't think so. For the GOP, white women only appear in ads about black men. Scarborough: That's what the McCain camp wants to talk about, so I will. And they're doing great. Ask anyone. Chuck Todd: McCain never goes above 45%. Get real.
The Chosen One said:Who cares. By the time the candidates call them out on it, the damage will have already been done. Just like the whole "Obama didn't visit veterans because he couldn't bring cameras" line that the McCain campaign pushed. By the time they issued a correction (which barely anyone reported), the perception that Obama cared about himself more than the troops already got out there.
This is the essence of dirty politics. Again, it seems Dems are incapable* of doing this.
* Note I said "incapable", not "unwilling". I bet the Dems would love to do this if they knew how.
ViperVisor said:Fucking tired of Pat being Joe's tag-team partner on half the days. Why are 3 other people even on the set. I've already stated the primary reason for Mika's presence in a previous pissy post of mine.
Actually she is on there to be the democrat counter-balance to Joe (Her dad is a key adviser for the Obama campaign) but she doesn't do that good of a job of it. So yours ends up sadly being more accurate.ViperVisor said:-Tight fitting top
-Giggly
syllogism said:
Cheebs said:Actually she is on there to be the democrat counter-balance to Joe (Her dad is a key adviser for the Obama campaign) but she doesn't do that good of a job of it. So yours ends up sadly being more accurate.
that's because Obama phrased it correctly - he is still opposed to it, but willing to make a political concession to grease the wheels towards a comprehensive bipartisan energy policy. he needs both republicans and big oil to agree to this, and being completely obstinate won't help.The Chosen One said:You know I've noticed?
Obama saying he's willing to comprising on Off-shore drilling was an excellent move. You can tell because the McCain campaign and surrogates aren't calling Obama a "flip-flopper" on this issue, which they easily could.
scorcho said:that's because Obama phrased it correctly - he is still opposed to it, but willing to make a political concession to grease the wheels towards a comprehensive bipartisan energy policy. he needs both republicans and big oil to agree to this, and being completely obdurate won't help.
also, it's not flip flopping if it means appeasing Republicans.
edit: this headline is pretty humorous. look! McCain has come around to Obama's pro-drilling position!
Cheebs said:One thing I think we can agree on is Joe is far less crazy than MSNBC's old morning host Don Imus
Reps only attack when a dem switches from the republicans position to a new one (Kerry switching from pro-iraq war to anti-iraq war was a flip-flop for example for them)scorcho said:that's because Obama phrased it correctly - he is still opposed to it, but willing to make a political concession to grease the wheels towards a comprehensive bipartisan energy policy. he needs both republicans and big oil to agree to this, and being completely obstinate won't help.
also, it's not flip flopping if it means appeasing Republicans.
edit: this headline is pretty humorous. look! McCain has come around to Obama's pro-drilling position!
Hootie said:Joe is so goddamned funny to me for some reason. :lol
maynerd said:They can't call obama a flip flopper on oil drilling because McCain already flip flopped on the issue.
But even among white workers -- a group of voters that has been targeted by both parties as a key to victory in November -- Obama leads McCain by 10 percentage points, 47 percent to 37 percent, and has the advantage as the more empathetic candidate.
I hope Obama is putting money behind that ad. He needs to play offense.syllogism said:
Obama needs to keep doing what he is doing. If he stops doing it, he won't be doing it any more, and then what will he do?Door2Dawn said:Obama needs to do this.
Obama needs to do that.
When pressed by one of the hosts on the show to explain how favorable congressional action on drilling both on and off shore would affect the price in less than several years, he "came clean."
"Ah," he said (roughly). "Approval of drilling will frighten the futures traders out of the market and the price will go a long way down." "They are already leaving the oil futures market" he went on. "This will push them out even faster."
the chutzpah of it all is amazing. THIS .2% WILL REALLY DRIVE FUTURE TRADERS OUT AND WEEN OURSELVES OFF FOREIGN OIL!According to the Energy Information Administration, removing restrictions on offshore drilling would, at peak about 20 years from now add about 0.2% to world production, with an insignificant effect on the price of oil.
Door2Dawn said:Obama needs to do this.
Obama needs to do that.
thekad said:What's Barack HUSSEIN Obama hiding under that dark skin of his, hmmmmm?
Eric P said:obama drives an energy policy like this
mccain drive an energy policy like that
maynerd said:yes because the futures traders have no idea that it's going to take 7 years to get a drop of oil and it'll be just a drop in the bucket. Hopefully no one will inform those traders of the plan or the plan will be ruined!
While big oil demonstrably has no pressing urge to drill, they very much want to lock down access to more leasable lands. What with those crazy leaders running around Russia and South America nationalizing the energy sector, and crazier environmentalists running around this country supporting bans and moratoria, the share of land in which American Big Oil Inc can poke holes is shrinking. And they'd like to close the deal before Bush/Cheney leave the building.
Obama needs to do this.
Obama needs to do that.
obama drives an energy policy like this
mccain drive an energy policy like that
masud said:Oh could someone explain Obama's position on nuclear energy? McCain says that Obama's against it but I remember Hilary getting on him in the debates for supporting it. What's the deal?
masud said:Oh could someone explain Obama's position on nuclear energy? McCain says that Obama's against it but I remember Hilary getting on him in the debates for supporting it. What's the deal?