maximum360 said:Apparently this Ad is only running in IN: http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0808/Obama_Fix_the_economy.html#comments
Rur0ni said:Wednesday night in Italy isn't Wednesday night in America sucka.
Interesting. I was wondering why Indiana was dropped from the other ad cycle. Obama seems to be doing increasingly local ad placements.maximum360 said:Apparently this Ad is only running in IN: http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0808/Obama_Fix_the_economy.html#comments
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/08/bayhdenkabelius.htmlMarc Ambinder raises a simple but important point about the Democratic veepstakes:
Item: the Democratic National Convention Committee confirms that Gov. Kathleen Sebelius has been given a Tuesday night speaking slot. Evidence that she won't be chosen as vice president?
Not really. The convention schedulers and Obama's VP team are entirely separate and segregated.
It's been a lot of fun, but we've probably been guilty of overinterpretation. Having been a partner in a small business, I can attest to the fact that rumors are contagious, and that the risk of leaks is an exponential function of the number of people let in on the secret.
The fact is that if the convention planners and schedulers in Denver know the identity of Obama's Vice Presidential selection, that means a lot of people know. And if a lot of people know, that means the media would know.
But the media doesn't know.
Ergo, not very many people do know. Perhaps only some combination of Obama, Axelrod, Plouffe, Gibbs, and the candidate him or herself, if the candidate has been chosen at all.
Ergo, we know nothing.
TrueReligion said:I'll masturbate to Kathleen Sebelius for one week straight if Wesley Clark becomes Obama's Veep.
Yeah her and Amy Holmes were on CNN at the same time today, crazy split hotness son.soul creator said:Andrea Tantaros is so hot, yet so so so wrong on everything
Sleeker said:Was Hilary even a chance for VP or was she just on the list to make it look like Obama would touch her without a ten foot pole?
Sleeker said:Was Hilary even a chance for VP or was she just on the list to make it look like Obama would touch her without a ten foot pole?
Obama camp said to be leaning towards Biden for vice president.
GAF fan speculation or the Tribune, Post, and MSNBC? HMMM WHO TO TRUST!RubxQub said:But the only 2 choices are Sebelius and Clark, so clearly you're wrong Cheebs.
ONLY TWO!
RubxQub said:But the only 2 choices are Sebelius and Clark, so clearly you're wrong Cheebs.
ONLY TWO!
*thatsracistkid.gif*gkrykewy said:But Biden is very articulate and clean for a white guy. Could work out okay.
Why would Bayh be a disaster? I like Biden more too, but Bayh is a solid senator.GhaleonEB said:I'd be kind of disappointed with Biden. But I'd get over it, I'm sure. Bayh would be a disaster, though.
Which is why I don't want him on the ticket. Senator Obama already has a problem with the good ol' boys,putting another liberal on the ticket would drive them away.Cheebs said:Biden would be awesome. He is a tough liberal. Not a wishy-washy moderate.
And he'd fucking OWN in the debates
If the final two is Biden & Bayh like everyone says it is my personal choice would be Biden (I think Bayh would help electorally more though)
Get over it, it's a gaf dream nothing more. At least with Selebius she actually got real speculation from those in the know back in June unlike Clark lol.Dax01 said:Obama/Clark '08!
Door2Dawn said:Which is why I don't want him on the ticket. Senator Obama already has a problem with the good ol' boys,putting another liberal on the ticket would drive them away.
And he has a reputation of shooting his mouth off,thats not good either.
Cheebs said:Why would Bayh be a disaster? I like Biden more too, but Bayh is a solid senator.
.Mr. Bayhs support of authorizing force in Iraq stands in sharp contrast to Mr. Obamas oft-stated view that he showed the good judgment to oppose the conflict from the start. After his vote, Mr. Bayh in early 2003 joined Mr. McCain as an honorary co-chairman of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, which made regime change in Iraq its central cause.
That's why I would be disappointed with him as a choice.ShOcKwAvE said:Biden voted for the Iraq war resolution, so I doubt it.
I would agree but energy, health care, and above all the economy are more important issues this election to the public so it really matters little compared to say 2006.GhaleonEB said:
I don't trust your predictions.Cheebs said:Get over it, it's a gaf dream nothing more. At least with Selebius she actually got real speculation from those in the know back in June unlike Clark lol.
McCain is closer to the President of Georgia than Bush, I wouldn't be surprised if McCain has more influence there than Bush does.scorcho said:what influence does McCain have at all in what will eventually be settled, and how is this anything but interference and political grandstanding? it not only smacks of desperation, but is a window to the crazy bipolar world McCain seems to reminisce of.
Uh I made no predictions about VP today? I just reposted what the Tribune said and repeated what the Post said last night.Dax01 said:I don't trust your predictions.
*sticks tongue out at Cheebs*
Dax01 said:I don't trust their predictions.
*sticks tongue out at Chicago Tribune, Washington Post, & MSNBC*
gkrykewy said:But Biden is very articulate and clean for a white guy. Could work out okay.
To be clear, I'm not talking about general public perception (though I think picking someone who voted for the war would hurt). I'm mostly referring to who I want to be vice president, and if it's someone that voted for the Iraq clusterfuck, no thanks.Cheebs said:I would agree but energy, health care, and above all the economy are more important issues this election to the public so it really matters little compared to say 2006.
Fine, you're right. But please, say that Obama's VP will not be Clark so I can be right!Cheebs said:Uh I made no predictions about VP today? I just reposted what the Tribune said and repeated what the Post said last night.
So to fix your post it should say
VanMardigan said:That was you channeling gaborn, right? :lol
Well then I must remind you, the VP has no power at all. They are just tools to be used to get elected and then sent off to funerals and shit (Cheney is the rare exception).GhaleonEB said:To be clear, I'm not talking about general public perception (though I think picking someone who voted for the war would hurt). I'm mostly referring to who I want to be vice president, and if it's someone that voted for the Iraq clusterfuck, no thanks.
I'm aware of that. Anyone who voted for this war has no business in the white house.Cheebs said:Well then I must remind you, the VP has no power at all. They are just tools to be used to get elected and then sent off to funerals and shit (Cheney is the rare exception).
Unless a credit card company tells him otherwise.Cheebs said:Biden would be awesome. He is a tough liberal. Not a wishy-washy
influence to do what? as far as i can tell the WH has not sanctioned McCain to speak on Bush's behalf. he's using his ties with Saakashvili for political gain that does not help the tension between Russia and Georgia.Cheebs said:McCain is closer to the President of Georgia than Bush, I wouldn't be surprised if McCain has more influence there than Bush does.
hey, liberals are firm believers in personal responsibility and really tiny fine print.Hitokage said:Unless a credit card company tells him otherwise.
Well compared to Mr. Moderate Bayh he is as left-wing as Stalin.Hitokage said:Unless a credit card company tells him otherwise.