ViperVisor said:
Why is sports reporting better than political? Cenk uses this point sometimes in a bit different context than this but whatever.
In sports the people/places that constantly talk wacky rumors become a joke. The ones that know their stuff you have to listen to cause they are almost never completely wrong. This Veepstakes nonsense is just a smorgasbord for the talking heads to nibble at for weeks on end. And now the morons are down to the bone so they have to take chomps at it to scoop the other morons as this nears a merciful end.
I'm not cenk, but this is my take on it:
Political "news" shows are focused on how the politics of the day will be seen by voters, and what effect it will have on "the game" of politics - a "game" played mostly by the network news stations. They rarely, if ever, discuss whether or not what politicians say is
true. For example, take the faith forum at Saddleback. Even though most pundits offhandedly acknowledged that McCain spent most of his answers dodging questions and reverting to stump speech mode, they still declared him the winner based on his use of quick soundbites (that the media uses to sell stories) and the crowd reaction. They are also spending this entire weak foaming at the mouth, trying desperately to leak Obama's VP and undermine his announcement process before his supporters get the text. In fact, one of the main reasons Obama fell out of favor with the cable news networks is because he HASN'T been playing their game, hasn't trusted them. It's all just a game to these politics newscasters.
Sports news, I wager, just reports what happens and the sportscasters actually go into whether a guy played good or not, whether a coach made good decisions, whether a trade was well done or retarded. They form opinions based on the "facts on the ground" and not how OTHER people should view the facts.
This is the problem with the 24 hour "news" networks. They have discussed the game of politics so much that they have become the game.