As we get nearer to election day, the disparity between the Nowcast and the Forecast will shrink, which is good news for Obama (gasp).I wonder how the lack of polling will effect Nate's model. Will be all the more impressive if it stays correct.
Even if this were true his numbers are still too stable. Look at how he got either tied or plus one four consecutive times. And it's similar in other states.
How is he so stable with moe of 4? It's nonsense. Even if you have a republican lean the variability in polling cannot change.
Even if you lean republican you should have some favorable dem outcomes randomly. All other republican leaning pollsters had shown this. Same with dem in favor of repubs.
Ras is consistently good for Romney and GOP senators. It's nonsense.
@ppppolls said:From our Halloween poll- Democrats are more likely to say they wish they could still trick or treat than Republicans #moochers #justkidding
Democrats say they would be willing to spend the night in a haunted house, Republicans say they would not
68% of Republicans, 49% of Democrats think it's possible for people to be possessed by demons
A. Again the variability cannot change despite method.Because he's using some polling methodology that doesn't account for bias, presumably, i.e. I don't call those young people will cell phones and/or have a "likely voters" model that favors conservatives. Outright manipulation of the poll to favor Romney sounds like a conspiracy theory to me.
This motherfucking state.
Look at that gender gap.
LOOK AT IT.
My dad is legitimately going to have a heart attack.
Pew national poll has the race tied 47-47% (previous poll after first debate R+4)
http://www.people-press.org/2012/10/29/presidential-race-dead-even-romney-maintains-turnout-edge/
A. Again the variability cannot change despite method.
B. it's been done before. Silver himself exposed a firm doing what I just said and they got sued.
Well daily kos sued also sued a polling firm for lying. It bappensI suppose I just don't understand the endgame in giving people false results.
Silver mentioned that it has a greater impact to impact Romney's poorer states that have fewer resources to respond to something like this, citing West Virginia as an example. Imagine turnout being so suppressed that Obama ends up winning here lol.
tnr said:If youre one of the many folks in my Twitter feed whos feeling a general unease because Hurricane Sandy and Election Day are in close proximity, I want you to relax a little. Not all the way, just a little.
Come Nov. 6, the Eastern seaboard will not be in total disarray. Hurricane Sandy is hitting the East Coast early enough that most of its effects will probably be ameliorated by Election Day. Of course, its not called a natural disaster for nothing. But dont worry about is the utter breakdown of the democratic process in the Northeast. Instead, pay attention to which select groups of voters might face storm-related trouble on Election Day, and how Obama reacts to the storm.
Broadly, there are two ways that Hurricane Sandy could throw Election Day into a funk. First, damage caused by the storm could make it harder for certain people to vote. John Hudak, a governance fellow at the Brookings Institute, reassures me that it would take a really unconscionable amount of damage to suppress voting in swing statesPennsylvania and Virginiaas voters there get just how close the race is. They could, however, be screwed out of voting by impassible roads, a risk that applies heavily to those rural (Republican) voters who live a solid 20 or 30 minutes from their polling place. Add the blizzard barreling toward western Virginia, where Romney is ahead, and Sandy could mean a handier victory for Obama.
On the other hand, widespread, persistent power loss would force polling places to either procure generators to run electronic voting machines or to issue paper ballots. The latter would mean extraordinarily long lines in more densely trafficked polling places, not unlike the lines that turned off urban (Democratic) voters in Cleveland in 2004. Turned-off voters in urban centers like New York, Connecticut, or Maryland wouldnt cost Obama those states. But as Alec MacGillis pointed out last week, depressed Democratic turnout would exaggerate the slim but real chance that Obama wins in the Electoral College while losing the popular vote....
One thing is certain, Hudak says, which is, Obamas response will dominate media coverage. And provided that Obama doesnt tell anyone hes doing a heckuva job when hes patently not, Obama will probably exit Sandys aftermath appearing in command and in control. What positive effects this could have for him (Would this bring new voters into Obamas column? How many?) may not be quantifiable, but Romneys general disadvantage is pretty clear. Everything is going to be about the storm, the governors, and the president, Hudak says. And all the super PAC money in the world cant buy Romney the attention that the president is going to get in the next few days.
Oh I wish for this to happen just so we can forever use it against Diablos
Wow. It's essentially everything I've been sayin'. How about that?Molly Redden wrote an article specifically for Diablos:
http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/109304/what-hurricane-sandy-means-election-day
Think of it as God's own October surprise.
Wow. It's essentially everything I've been sayin'. How about that?
They had a poll in the summer showing Baldwin up 7 over Thompson when everyone else was showing a Baldwin lead.Well daily kos sued also sued a polling firm for lying. It bappens
I don't know what ras is doing. I'm just saying their results are off statistically. Not because it favors the GOP but because its too stable. They show no mistakes.
Compare the. To PPP. Their numbers move. Same with everyone else. Sometimes in GOP favor.
I haven't plotted he data by ras so it's just me asking stuff. It looks too stable. Maybe I'm wrong and suffering from confirmation bias. It's why I asked for a ras poll being good for dens contrary to opinion.
What the hell is going on in Florida? Old people voting against their rights?
I wonder how Blitzer is going to spin the Florida poll. Also do you think for the next couple of days polls will be ignored on tv for Sandy coverage.
Another poll, another consistent lead for Governor Romney.Romney pulling away!
At least it remains close. I had pretty much written off Florida considering the voted in Rick Scott.This motherfucking state.
Look at that gender gap.
LOOK AT IT.
My dad is legitimately going to have a heart attack.
Yup. No sense trying to represent the whole country when one region is under duress for a few days. I was wondering when the announcement would come.
Gallup suspends polling
http://thequeue.gallup.com/2012/10/gallup-polling-during-hurricane-sandy.html
Bad news for bad news for Obama?
Yup. No sense trying to represent the whole country when one region is under duress for a few days. I was wondering when the announcement would come.
We're in the dark. Hold meeeeereeererrGallup suspends polling
http://thequeue.gallup.com/2012/10/gallup-polling-during-hurricane-sandy.html
Bad news for bad news for Obama?
It will be interesting to see how long it takes CNN calls states for Obama or Romney given their current state of being obsessed over being "even-handed".
Q: Can you tell us why after backing Obama in 2008 you went with Gov Romney this year?
A: We deliberated and the 5 member panel decided that Gov Romney had the best plans for Iowas economy
Q: Can you give us some of those specifics of his plan for our viewers?
A: I am not going to get into details, we also appreciated his transparency
Q: So how do you feel about the incident regard Jeep and the fact that Romney was clearly caught lying now? If your advising your readers about who to trust how do you feel about this recent event?
A: We are not going to get into details, we feel he has the better plan for Iowa
Q: So with the unemployment rate at 5% one of the lowest in the nation, what exactly is it with Obama's plans that make you think another 4 years would not keep lowering that number?
A: We are not going to get into details, we believe Gov Romney has the best plan for Iowa.
I just found out Bill Clinton was the only post-WW2 democratic president to win a second term.![]()
"Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan" is a perfect anagram for "My Ultimate Ayn Rand Porn"
It will be interesting to see how long it takes CNN calls states for Obama or Romney given their current state of being obsessed over being "even-handed".
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/10/29/brown_overtakes_warren_in_massachusetts.htmlBrown Overtakes Warren in Massachusetts
A new Boston Globe poll in Massachusetts shows Sen. Scott Brown (R) with a razor thin lead over Elizabeth Warren (D) in their U.S. Senate race among likely voters, 45% to 43%.
In September, Warren held a five point lead.
However, Brown's lead evaporates, with 47% for each candidate, when voters who are undecided are asked which candidate they are leaning toward.
Nah they're competing with other outlets to get the news out first. They'll call it as soon as they can
Did anyone see the Des Moines Register Editor on MSNBC this morning? It was hilarious, the conversation went like this
I sat there with my mouth open, it was like am I the only one watching them completely avoid every question
Did anyone see the Des Moines Register Editor on MSNBC this morning? It was hilarious, the conversation went like this
I sat there with my mouth open, it was like am I the only one watching them completely avoid every question
It means that Mitt gets to help out with the clean-up and recovery efforts in his Massachusetts after the race, as he'll have plenty of free time at that point.So God is punishing us heathen libruls along with the gays and the depraved, filthy ny crazies. What does that mean for Romney's chances?
So God is punishing us heathen libruls along with the gays and the depraved, filthy ny crazies. What does that mean for Romney's chances?