Obama campaign cancelled all events for tomorrow as well just now.
Ironically the Romney campaign like an hour ago annouced their "Victory" rallies will be fully back on the schedule starting tomorrow. So Romney will be fully campaigning while Obama is dealing with the Hurricane, not just pretending to not campaign as he is today.
No, you don't get it. A one point loss is heartbreaking, but nothing is more disorienting, disheartening, and outright soul-crushing as a team that thinks themselves to be the overwhelming favorite getting absolutely destroyed on the field in every aspect of the game.
That's what needs to happen.
Good. Obama will look good all week by just doing his job. Biden and Clinton can still draw crowds and attend rallies, so continuing that is what they need to do for now.
He's working you out, Papa Joe. No time to help fix the trains.
Heh, press badge for the "storm relief event"
https://twitter.com/Ari_Shapiro/status/263279533686403073/photo/1
Press also posting pictures of all the relief supplies though being gathered.
So my friend is freaking out about this:
http://www.ukprogressive.co.uk/brea...aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582
basically saying that wherever Obama doesn't have at least a 10% lead, he will lose because the GOP will hack the voting computers.
He's Diablosing.
I asked him why didn't this happen in 2008 then, and he just said "Sarah Palin happened"
So my friend is freaking out about this:
http://www.ukprogressive.co.uk/brea...aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582
basically saying that wherever Obama doesn't have at least a 10% lead, he will lose because the GOP will hack the voting computers.
He's Diablosing.
I asked him why didn't this happen in 2008 then, and he just said "Sarah Palin happened"
If this is such a big deal with such ironclad evidence, why isn't the New York Times printing it? Why is it only in one progressive blog in the UK and maybe one newspaper over there?
I've gotta say.. a skin-of-the-teeth victory is exhilarating. The closest I've gotten was going to the NFC Championship in 2010, Saints vs Vikings. Won with an overtime field goal kicked by a shaky kicker. The whole city blew-up right then and there (but to our credit, we didn't riot; we just danced).2004 Lakers...
Press also posting pictures of all the relief supplies though being gathered.
Being a flip-flopper is...actually a good thing!
I thought Red Cross and other origination didn't want people actually donating food. I think that's been the case for years. Money and clothes sure but actual food, even if they're canned goods, take to long to sort and can be a health hazard.
Being a flip-flopper is...actually a good thing!
Being a flip-flopper is...actually a good thing!
The bottom line is this: If Obama wins, well probably get small-bore stasis, because the Republicans will continue to be jackasses; if Romney wins, then the Republican strategy of obstructionism wins, and were more likely to get bipartisan reform, because Democrats aren't terrible human beings like their Republican counterparts.
So my friend is freaking out about this:
http://www.ukprogressive.co.uk/brea...aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582
basically saying that wherever Obama doesn't have at least a 10% lead, he will lose because the GOP will hack the voting computers.
He's Diablosing.
I asked him why didn't this happen in 2008 then, and he just said "Sarah Palin happened"
As much as I'd like to believe this, the analysis of the data is incorrect. The cumulative value is used incorrectly on the X-axis, instead of just the Y, giving statistical bias to the large numbered precincts due to the accumulation. If you use column L instead, which is the integer total number of votes per precinct, you get the flat line you are expecting with the cumulative still used on the Y axis. If you generate the resulting graph it also produces a lot of variance in the smaller precincts before it levels out, which is what I would expect intuitively, it's unlikely that smaller precincts will have such a consistent curve shown in your graph with such a small amount of data, ie 10 voters. I can post the picture of your modified graph, but this comment section does not allow it. If you send me your email, I can send it to you along with the modified excel sheet.
They are definitely going to highlight it. I don't agree with some that this is somehow going to make him look bad. Bill and Joe should have been doing the same thing. Missed opportunity for dems to be honest.Must mean that every nightly news show tonight will spend all thirty minutes highlighting how compassionate and amazing Mitt Romney is for holding this event that will feed hundreds who need it.
It's still positive press I think
"Storm relief event" in Dayton begins with the Romney bio campaign video touting his record as a leader & a problem-solver.
I saw that article, and checked the comments. The top rated one says this:
sounds solid to me. wrap this one up as paranoia + bad math
How have you not had a stroke over the last month?
All I am trying to say is that if Obama held an event right now and held it in Ohio, when it's NJ and NY that are devastated but just called it "Storm Relief Shit" the media would be all over him doing politics
The American Conservative ripped this up this morning. David Brooks is coming in for a lot of abuse from both sides, which I think is mean since he clearly has had a stroke and thinks it's 1963 and the GOP is a moderate party.
What time did the rally start today? And when Romney announce suspending his campaign?this storm relief event looks as silly as i assumed it would.
You guys are over-reading Christie. The last thing a governor wants to so during a disaster is piss off a sitting president.
You guys are over-reading Christie. The last thing a governor wants to so during a disaster is piss off a sitting president.
You guys are over-reading Christie. The last thing a governor wants to so during a disaster is piss off a sitting president.
Apparently Romney is doubling down on the Jeep-China ad, now its going radio:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...9e8a986-229d-11e2-ac85-e669876c6a24_blog.html
Tell that to Jindal.
From what I understand FEMA left pretty quickly there. Just sayingTell that to Jindal.
Apparently Romney is doubling down on the Jeep-China ad, now its going radio:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...9e8a986-229d-11e2-ac85-e669876c6a24_blog.html
You guys are over-reading Christie. The last thing a governor wants to so during a disaster is piss off a sitting president.
Apparently Romney is doubling down on the Jeep-China ad, now its going radio:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...9e8a986-229d-11e2-ac85-e669876c6a24_blog.html
Anyone else feel like he's more emboldened to do this because media attention will be on the hurricane for the last weeks of the campaign, rather than spending time trying to call him on his BS?
Quinnipiac University/New York Times/CBS will release last polls of Ohio, VA, and FL tomorrow morning at 7
Oh my. The Big Three.Hope Gaf's ready for more heart attacks:
Apparently Romney is doubling down on the Jeep-China ad, now its going radio:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...9e8a986-229d-11e2-ac85-e669876c6a24_blog.html