I'm okay with romney being the secret winner if it makes republicans happy and Obama still gets to be president
I just don't want the whole split election (Romney winning PV and Obama winning EV).
I'm okay with romney being the secret winner if it makes republicans happy and Obama still gets to be president
I'm okay with romney being the secret winner if it makes republicans happy and Obama still gets to be president
lol @ that Rove article.
A blatant lie.
Someone on Fox said Sandy was "mana from heaven" for Obama. Seriously. It might have been Kurtz.
Shit's already ramping up more than I expected. Republicans are not willing to lose this election. I can't be the only one anticipating significant tampering on election day?Guys, I hope you're ready because
THE CRAZY IS GOING TO GET REAL FUCKING CRAZY FROM THE GOP TIL ELECTION DAY
Seriously. The stuff we're about to read/hear will be off the charts.
Fox News lol. 3 things.
1. Still can't let Libya go. Sorry bros, you got whiskey dick
2. lol @ bias alert
3. climate change headline misleading. Scientists skeptical about blaming Sandy on climate change, not on actual climate change. See, this is how they mislead people with a faux title.
I'm okay with romney being the secret winner if it makes republicans happy and Obama still gets to be president
McCain has been secret President for four years now.
I love the phrase "secretly winning by a landslide" . . . great oxymoronic flair.
looks like nate updated 538 a second time:
forecast jumped to 79%. nowcast at 81.4%. ev forecast is over 300 for the first time in over three weeks.
looks like nate updated 538 a second time:
forecast jumped to 79%. nowcast at 81.4%. ev forecast is over 300 for the first time in over three weeks.
looks like nate updated 538 a second time:
forecast jumped to 79%. nowcast at 81.4%. ev forecast is over 300 for the first time in over three weeks.
I will be so happy to see that "historic debate" bullshit turn to vapor. 6 more days and it's all over.
Goes to CNNhttp://i.imgur.com/8BzFQ.png
Fox News lol. 3 things.
1. Still can't let Libya go. Sorry bros, you got whiskey dick
2. lol @ bias alert
3. climate change headline misleading. Scientists skeptical about blaming Sandy on climate change, not on actual climate change. See, this is how they mislead people with a faux title.
looks like nate updated 538 a second time:
forecast jumped to 79%. nowcast at 81.4%. ev forecast is over 300 for the first time in over three weeks.
I have a feeling that Obama turns VA and/or FL to seal it earlier than expected.
It's great because you know, in 08 the sentiment was like "Alright, we'll let the Kenyan have a turn and when he fails, we'll be back in charge" Sort of a "you'll come CRAWLING back!"Things moving our way.. hmm.. reminds me of the incredible Hopium high I had for weeks after the 2008 Election. Counting down to when Bush would disappear. Wondering who'd be in the cabinet. Watching the world breathe sighs of relief, sending thanks and congrats our way for "getting it right this time."
Sure, there were GOP tears - but not nearly as many high-grade, tea party-flavored delicacies. This year, I can see the whining and crying lasting much, much longer. And there'll be the added sideshow of The War for the GOP's Soul - that could take a considerably long time, and could even produce a (metaphorical) body count, or perhaps defections to the Democrats.
The tension may end in 140 hours or so, but the intrigue and excitement don't. So many story lines, ready to all explode as soon as victory is confirmed!
What was the sample at this time in 2008? Anyone know?In the poll, conducted Oct. 24-28, 19% of likely voters say they have already voted; that is unchanged from the same week in the 2008 campaign (Oct. 23-26, 2008). Currently, Romney holds a seven-point edge among early voters (50% to 43%); because of the small sample, this lead is not statistically significant. At this point four years ago, Obama led John McCain by 19 points (53% to 34%) among early voters.
Precisely! We're going to see more of a "how..how could you?!" vibe from the GOP this time around. All of their plotting, their obstruction, their carefully-coordinated and heavily-disciplined messaging strategies, their hopes and dreams of grabbing back the reins of power as soon as Bush the Lesser had faded from the voting populace's collective memory - all of this for nothing.It's great because you know, in 08 the sentiment was like "Alright, we'll let the Kenyan have a turn and when he fails, we'll be back in charge" Sort of a "you'll come CRAWLING back!"
Well... not too many people are crawling.
So Pew says...
What was the sample at this time in 2008? Anyone know?
Pew is the real deal, so this stat is nothing to scoff at. Making me a bit uncomfortable. That said, a lot of red states are probably pushing Mitt over the top with early voting. If we are to assume Pew counts Obama as being ahead in OH, IA, and CO then it really doesn't matter.
But it's still way too close for comfort, and it would be nice to know what the sample was in 2008.
Some 24 percent of those surveyed nationally said they had already cast their ballots, providing further evidence that early voting will play a larger role than ever in the election. Among those who had not yet voted, a quarter said they planned to cast their ballots before Election Day.
Obama led Romney by 53 percent to 41 percent among the 1,660 respondents who said they had already voted.
So Pew says...
What was the sample at this time in 2008? Anyone know?
Pew is the real deal, so this stat is nothing to scoff at. Making me a bit uncomfortable. That said, a lot of red states are probably pushing Mitt over the top with early voting. If we are to assume Pew counts Obama as being ahead in OH, IA, and CO then it really doesn't matter.
But it's still way too close for comfort, and it would be nice to know what the sample was in 2008.
So Pew says...
What was the sample at this time in 2008? Anyone know?
Pew is the real deal, so this stat is nothing to scoff at. Making me a bit uncomfortable. That said, a lot of red states are probably pushing Mitt over the top with early voting. If we are to assume Pew counts Obama as being ahead in OH, IA, and CO then it really doesn't matter.
But it's still way too close for comfort, and it would be nice to know what the sample was in 2008.
You are Diablosing. The sample size was 327 people. Too small of a sample for an accurate result.
So two hookers from the Dominican Republic just so happened to get in contact with the Daily Caller and not any of the numerous legitimate news agencies out there, and in addition, wanted to have their identities remain secret.............LOL. Fuck you Tucker Carlson
Precisely! We're going to see more of a "how..how could you?!" vibe from the GOP this time around. All of their plotting, their obstruction, their carefully-coordinated and heavily-disciplined messaging strategies, their hopes and dreams of grabbing back the reins of power as soon as Bush the Lesser had faded from the voting populace's collective memory - all of this for nothing.
Plus, now it's their turn to worry about the health of their own favorite Supreme Court justices. One four-year period can feel like an eternity for a 76-year-old. Especially when the opposing party holds all the cards in the Senate.
Why the fuck are they even including that if it's only 327 people?
Is Pew not credible anymore? WTF
http://www.people-press.org/2012/10/31/in-deadlocked-race-neither-side-has-ground-game-advantage/The Pew Research Center survey found that the race is even among all likely voters nationwide (47% Obama, 47% Romney). Unlike the last campaign, the race also is close among voters who say they have already voted.
In the poll, conducted Oct. 24-28, 19% of likely voters say they have already voted; that is unchanged from the same week in the 2008 campaign (Oct. 23-26, 2008). Currently, Romney holds a seven-point edge among early voters (50% to 43%); because of the small sample, this lead is not statistically significant. At this point four years ago, Obama led John McCain by 19 points (53% to 34%) among early voters.
Oh wow, thanks.
Still, Pew is super credible, yo, and that they have it at a dead heat really blows.
I just want this election to be OVER (with an Obama win)
Oh wow, thanks.
Still, Pew is super credible, yo, and that they have the election at a dead heat really blows.
I just want this election to be OVER (with an Obama win)
What's the deal with Christie's current behaviour? As in, what's his political motivation here?
"I wonder if he's made of chocolate?"What's the deal with Christie's current behaviour? As in, what's his political motivation here?
What's the deal with Christie's current behaviour? As in, what's his political motivation here?
Wow, I was hoping Obama could just hold steady in RAND tonight and not drop.
Instead, he went back up. 50.5-45. Obama +6. That's +1.5 tonight.
I was hoping for him to hold steady which would indicate the race is possibly going to tighten, but slowly.
This is looking more like Obama has solidified his spot in RAND at over 50%.
wow they are seriously going to blame a natural disaster for Romney losing.It appears that Howard Kurtz is now blaming Hurricane Sandy for "blunting the momentum that Romney had achieved since the debates", never mind that Obama was already on the ascendant even before the hurricane struck. I guess journalists have found a convenient exit out of the Romentum narrative if it fails to transpire. Other journalists and pundits are taking a postmodern "we can't really know anything" approach. Objective knowledge is impossible to achieve! No one knows who's winning! God, I can't wait for November 6th to arrive.
looks like nate updated 538 a second time:
forecast jumped to 79%. nowcast at 81.4%. ev forecast is over 300 for the first time in over three weeks.