What's the deal with Christie's current behaviour? As in, what's his political motivation here?
Well . . . do you think they'll blame themselves or their policies?wow they are seriously going to blame a natural disaster for Romney losing.
Wow just looking at thread views there are over 500,000, I'm betting there are alot of conservatives/republicans lurking here.
wow they are seriously going to blame a natural disaster for Romney losing.
If a natural disaster causes Romney to lose this election then isn't it fair to say, using many conservatives' argument of choice, that divine intervention wanted Romney to lose? I'd say God is definitely voting for Obama in this election
Didn't the former Governor of Louisiana respond poorly to FEMA going in during Katrina, which eventually led to him being ousted? Or have I been fed misinformation?His state has just been massively shit on and he needs all the help he can get. He's also:
1) Betting on Obama being reelected. He's been talking a lot about forming a partnership with him and the federal government going forward, the implication being that he's assuming Obama is going to be the man he has to deal with, and not just as a lame duck. This also plays into 2016 ambitions, assuming his own party hasn't completely disowned him by then.
2) Betting on a bipartisan disaster response playing well in traditionally blue (at least presidentially) New Jersey. He's up for reelection next year.
3) Aware that the people he has to deal with right now are the Obama Administration, whether he likes it or not, for the sake of his constituents, even if that changes in a few days.
As much as I dislike Christie and his politics, his disaster response and his current love affair with Obama both seem thoroughly genuine. Pragmatism over rhetoric in the face of tragedy.
Well I figured they would do the whole "Mitt wasn't conservative enough and he flip flopped too much, we need a more conservative nominee next time" thing. Maybe with a bit of ZOMG VOTER FRAUD sprinkled on top.Well . . . do you think they'll blame themselves or their policies?
wow @ that bias alert..
Fox News lol. 3 things.
1. Still can't let Libya go. Sorry bros, you got whiskey dick
2. lol @ bias alert
3. climate change headline misleading. Scientists skeptical about blaming Sandy on climate change, not on actual climate change. See, this is how they mislead people with a faux title.
What's the deal with Christie's current behaviour? As in, what's his political motivation here?
Scarborough isn't on Morning Joe this morning and they are basically writing the Romney campaign's obituary. Mark Halperin says that insiders from both sides are starting to feel like Obama has this
Nate's getting fed up with these guys.
Really happy seeing the WaPo-ABC poll about Sandy response - sure it's been posted before but here some more bad news for Obama:
I'm feeling very confident right now.
Basically, Mitt Internals are unskewed.
No, they're "different" in an unspecified way. Heaps of credibility from halperin.
I think something's wrong with Romney numbers on this: how can 25% excellent and 48% good make 44% total positive ?
Scarborough isn't on Morning Joe this morning and they are basically writing the Romney campaign's obituary. Mark Halperin says that insiders from both sides are starting to feel like Obama has this
I think something's wrong with Romney numbers on this: how can 25% excellent and 48% good make 44% total positive ?
Romney and the Federal numbers details are switched (the "positive" numbers, anyway).
So Pew says...
What was the sample at this time in 2008? Anyone know?
Pew is the real deal, so this stat is nothing to scoff at. Making me a bit uncomfortable. That said, a lot of red states are probably pushing Mitt over the top with early voting. If we are to assume Pew counts Obama as being ahead in OH, IA, and CO then it really doesn't matter.
But it's still way too close for comfort, and it would be nice to know what the sample was in 2008.
Nate's getting fed up with these guys.
Just how Obama did Hillary, time to find a admin spot for Romney come next week.
Obama will hire then fire himNEVER GOING TO HAPPEN.
Obama hates Romney.
Just how Obama did Hillary, time to find a admin spot for Romney come next week.
Hi guys, just wanted to point out that I put up a GAF Election Poll in OT here:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=497980
Please feel free to participate, thanks!
Lol they are already doing a hypothetical "what if" for romney if he could've done his campaign differently. They are slowly preparing for that romney loss. Damn I wanted them to go into nov 6th super confident just so that their emotional fall would be bigger.
Lol they are already doing a hypothetical "what if" for romney if he could've done his campaign differently. They are slowly preparing for that romney loss. Damn I wanted them to go into nov 6th super confident just so that their emotional fall would be bigger.
"The governor should have never proceeded"
Colorado: Romney 50%, Obama 47% (Rasmussen)
Florida: Obama 47%, Romney 47% (Newsmax/Zogby)
Iowa: Obama 50%, Romney 44% (NBC/WSJ/Marist)
Michigan: Obama 53%, Romney 45% (Public Policy Polling)
Nevada: Obama 50%, Romney 46% (SurveyUSA)
New Hampshire: Obama 49%, Romney 47% (NBC/WSJ/Marist)
Ohio: Obama 50%, Romney 44% (Newsmax/Zogby)
Virginia: Obama 49%, Romney 46% (Public Policy Polling)
Virginia: Romney 48%, Obama 47% (Newsmax/Zogby)
Wisconsin: Obama 49%, Romney 46% (NBC/WSJ/Marist)
Wisconsin: Obama 49%, Romney 49% (Rasmussen)
alright so what does mitt romney do if he loses the election? dont think he will run for president again and he will still have his lust for power. run for senator? don't think he is the kinda guy fox news viewers like so i doubt he works for them.
For those who don't click on the link