StopMakingSense
Member
All these new state polls, and RCP has barely added any of them, WTF?
THey don't post "paid for by third party" polls (like these PPP polls), or something.
All these new state polls, and RCP has barely added any of them, WTF?
It's so transparent. They really tried hard to make Benghazi Obama's 1979 Iran Hostage Crisis when it didn't fit whatsoever, and now this.Neil Cavuto is really playing up the losing patience and long gas lines due to Sandy right now. Pretty obvious Fox is trying to make Sandy Obama's Katrina because since a Republican got shit for a natural disaster (Bush with Katrina), they going to make damn sure a Democrat gets his/her own 'Katrina', too.
Got to even that score.
All these new state polls, and RCP has barely added any of them, WTF?
Better than voter fraud.
I don't get how they can use that.
There's modest evidence challengers enjoyed a small advantage in the past. But over the past two decades, whatever advantage existed has dissipated. So, no. It's a spurious argument as most of the evidence indicates neither candidate enjoys an inherent advantage.Is there any substance to his claim that undecideds usually break for the challenger?
Not happening. An esteemed member of GAF assured me Mourdock would win. Even after the rape comment. I'll trust him.@PollTracker: IN Senator '12 : Donnelly 45.0% Mourdock 42.0% (Nov. 01 - Rasmussen) http://t.co/YPd1jaXZ
AH HAHAHA!
You know, implicit in this is the claim that Chris Christie stabbed Republicans in the back.The going excuse is that before the storm, the narrative about Obama being unable to work across party lines - something that is very appealing to Independents - was sticking hard. Afterwards, with images plastered across the tv media of him with Christie, him hugging victims of the storm, him putting aside his campaign while Romney rallied on the cut screen next to his presidential lookin' ass... that narrative cracked. For a glimmering moment it appeared that Obama could work with Republicans.
Simple:
1. Say it
2. Say it
3. Say it again
Done!
Amazing to see this thread come full circle after everyone was diablosing after the first debate. I know it's boring and shit, but seriously, nothing has changed since last October other than Republicans never coming to terms with the damage they've done to the country since Clinton left office. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Boehner, McConnell, McCain, Palin, and now Romney/Ryan. Not one of them own up to the costs of failed leadership, not one of them atone for the traitorous sabotage their party has done to our nation.
PS -- Can I please start the 4-year anniversary thread of 'Checkin' off his list'?
To be fair, I heard a report on NPR this morning about people in New York bitching about not getting enough Federal Aid.
The Freepers are going nuts saying that Sandy - and by extension, Christie's emotional "pseudo endorsement" - handed the election to Obama.So it appears the Republicans have settled on a firm, unified excuse for Tuesday: The election was well in hand for Romney until Hurricane Sandy ruined everything
classic
Obama fired up the HAARP machines to create the hurricane and thus win the hearts & minds of voters . . . especially when he forced Chris Christie to say nice things about him if he wanted any money for Jersey.Dick Morris is chicken little-ing these Rasmussen polls. Historic landslide on hold. Blames Sandy.
http://www.dickmorris.com/in-the-last-few-hours-sudden-danger-signs-in-polling/
e:
WeAskAmerica Ohio, O +4.4%
WeAskAmerica VA, O +0.9%
WeAskAmerica WI, O +6.7%
http://polltracker.talkingpointsmemo.com/polls/5094215cebcabf07450000b5
http://polltracker.talkingpointsmemo.com/polls/5094210eebcabf074c0000b0
http://polltracker.talkingpointsmemo.com/polls/509420b3ebcabf07550000af
The funny part about the GOP thinking that Sandy caused Obama to win is that it means GOD wanted Obama to win.
WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW?
voting for Obama lolz
The Freepers are going nuts saying that Sandy - and by extension, Christie's emotional "pseudo endorsement" - handed the election to Obama.
Obama fired up the HAARP machines to create the hurricane and thus win the hearts & minds of voters . . . especially when he forced Chris Christie to say nice things about him if he wanted any money for Jersey.
Amazing to see this thread come full circle after everyone was diablosing after the first debate. I know it's boring and shit, but seriously, nothing has changed since last October other than Republicans never coming to terms with the damage they've done to the country since Clinton left office. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Boehner, McConnell, McCain, Palin, and now Romney/Ryan. Not one of them own up to the costs of failed leadership, not one of them atone for the traitorous sabotage their party has done to our nation.
PS -- Can I please start the 4-year anniversary thread of 'Checkin' off his list'?
[url=http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=42842393&postcount=4697]Amir0x[/url] said:I am genuinely confident. Because it's not about national polls, it's about battlegrounds, and one debate is not going to erase the extremely strong ground work laid by the Obama campaign, particularly in rust belt states. He's already polling a consistent 5~ points ahead in Ohio, and he has 96 field offices compared to 30 some for Romney there, he was way ahead in polls during the start of Early Voting, and a debate isn't going to change Romney's "let Detroit go Bankrupt" or his 47% comments, not entirely, and Obama is going to continue to rule the airwaves on that front.
And then there is the Electoral College on a broader scale; something like a seismic shift would have to occur for Romney to be a odds-on favorite. And the debate, while clearly a loss for Obama, is not that. It simply gives Romney his first real winning news cycle all campaign, which for Romney must seem like heaven, for Obama supporters must seem completely unfamiliar and horrifying, but in the end is not enough to win an election.
You know, implicit in this is the claim that Chris Christie stabbed Republicans in the back.
The Freepers are going nuts saying that Sandy - and by extension, Christie's emotional "pseudo endorsement" - handed the election to Obama.
He was just wainting for an excuse to stop spinning, so that he can maintain some shred of credibility. He's known all along his own stuff was bs. Now he has his excuse, he can drop some pretense and save enough face so that he gets press next time around.
The funny part about the GOP thinking that Sandy caused Obama to win is that it means GOD wanted Obama to win.
WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW?
voting for Obama lolz
You heard it here first: Democrats are powered by bad weather and the devil's* computing machines.
They're not fans of representative government.Holy shit. A newspaper here asked about early voting on facebook. They asked whether it should be allowed, etc, and some of the responses are just plain stupid:
Seriously, what's wrong with these people?
It's not even so much implicit as explicit. The freepers are already condemning him as this generation's greatest traitor.You know, implicit in this is the claim that Chris Christie stabbed Republicans in the back.
You gotta hand it to the GOP . . . the fucked themselves over badly. Akin was a rape nut, Mourdock was a rape nut, George 'Macaca' Allen never should have been allowed to run, Tommy Thompson turned out to be crazy-old-Tea-partier, Scott 'Tomahawk Chop' Brown lost it in the debates, etc. They could have picked up seats but they went with crazy & bad.Let's look at this:
30 Continuing Democrats
Manchin
Gillibrand
Klobuchar
Cantwell
Whitehouse
Mendez
Stabenow
Feinstein
Hirono
Carper
Cadin
King
Sanders
Casey
Heinrich
Nelson
McCaskill
Murphy
Brown
Should all win handily.
Then:
Warren
Connelly
Baldwin
Allen
Tester
Should all win.
That leaves:
Heitkamp
Berkley
Carmona
As the tossups. 54, minimum. Could be an upset with 55.
Well then, there it is.It's not even so much implicit as explicit. The freepers are already condemning him as this generation's greatest traitor.
Obama fired up the HAARP machines to create the hurricane and thus win the hearts & minds of voters
he just asked janet napalotino why they didn't pre-position "stuff" such as generators, water before the storm hit to which she replied: "you don't want to preposition stuff in the path of the storm...."
Good news for John Roberts.It's not even so much implicit as explicit. The freepers are already condemning him as this generation's greatest traitor.
Should have used a satellite map instead of ground-based radar.CHEEZMO;43898300 said:http://i.imgur.com/CKOBe.gif
he just asked janet napalotino why they didn't pre-position "stuff" such as generators, water before the storm hit to which she replied: "you don't want to preposition stuff in the path of the storm...."
he just asked janet napalotino why they didn't pre-position "stuff" such as generators, water before the storm hit to which she replied: "you don't want to preposition stuff in the path of the storm...."
You gotta hand it to the GOP . . . the fucked themselves over badly. Akin was a rape nut, Mourdock was a rape nut, George 'Macaca' Allen never should have been allowed to run, Tommy Thompson turned out to be crazy-old-Tea-partier, Scott 'Tomahawk Chop' Brown lost it in the debates, etc. They could have picked up seats but they went with crazy & bad.
he just asked janet napalotino why they didn't pre-position "stuff" such as generators, water before the storm hit to which she replied: "you don't want to preposition stuff in the path of the storm...."
he just asked janet napalotino why they didn't pre-position "stuff" such as generators, water before the storm hit to which she replied: "you don't want to preposition stuff in the path of the storm...."
Good news for John Roberts.
You gotta hand it to the GOP . . . the fucked themselves over badly. Akin was a rape nut, Mourdock was a rape nut, George 'Macaca' Allen never should have been allowed to run, Tommy Thompson turned out to be crazy-old-Tea-partier, Scott 'Tomahawk Chop' Brown lost it in the debates, etc. They could have picked up seats but they went with crazy & bad.
Not happening. An esteemed member of GAF assured me Mourdock would win. Even after the rape comment. I'll trust him.
Yup. I'm at the point where I'd rather watch left-leaning commentary on MSNBC or PBS..If there's one solid development this election cycle, it's that we've taken CNN from a semi-respectable, somewhat tolerable news organization to a grossly incompetent one. Rightly so.
ok first time i genuinely laugh at a version of this meme lol