• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PolliGaf 2012 |OT5| Big Bird, Binders, Bayonets, Bad News and Benghazi

Status
Not open for further replies.

Averon

Member
For the GOP's alternate reality to work, it must mean nearly every pollster, every aggregate site, common sense, and history must be wrong. That there's some massive GOP wave cleverly hiding just under the surface that will burst with a vengeance on November 6th.
 

HylianTom

Banned
It's kinda sad. I'm starting to see cracks in the bubble for the conservatives around me, which means that their meltdowns are going to be a bit less pronounced. Instead of the usual deluded bullshit bravado, they've been veeerrrry quiet.

Aww.. who am I kidding? They'll lash-out regardless in a few days. Yum!
 

Chichikov

Member
It's funny to see the Romney camp grossly exaggerate even that lol.
I don't think there was ever in the history of the world a political gathering where the law enforcement attendance estimates weren't significantly lower than the organizers'.
Don't hate the playa.
 
Which is probably why they believe its going to happen, to the right every polling technique is flawed.

Yup. Problem is that polling is a lot better today, more professional, and there are too many polls to simply dismiss every one that doesn't benefit your side (that goes to liberals too, btw); notice three weeks ago conservatives had no problem with the polls, which showed a tightening race mainly due to independents moving to the R side. Now independents seem to be moving back towards dems, although I maintain some of the IDs are ridiculous (+9 dem in Ohio for instance).
 

border

Member
I don't think a lot of the GOP pundits really believe there is some kind of secret Romney surge that hasn't been picked up on by ANY polling agency.

They just know they have to pretend it's a close race so they can get as many of their voters out there as possible.

I think 2008 felt much the same way to me -- where some people couldn't keep from convincing themselves that McCain could pull out a win, and they said so right up until the moment he officially lost FL and OH. And this was even though McCain had clearly already given up, and was fucking around on Saturday Night Live 3 days before the election.
 

Aylinato

Member
Yup. Problem is that polling is a lot better today, more professional, and there are too many polls to simply dismiss every one that doesn't benefit your side (that goes to liberals too, btw); notice three weeks ago conservatives had no problem with the polls, which showed a tightening race mainly due to independents moving to the R side. Now independents seem to be moving back towards dems, although I maintain some of the IDs are ridiculous (+9 dem in Ohio for instance).


Yet you're fine with polls that have Obama losing by 5 points in places where Obama has been winning the entire election.


You can do better.
 

Cloudy

Banned
For the GOP's alternate reality to work, it must mean nearly every pollster, every aggregate site, common sense, and history must be wrong. That there's some massive GOP wave cleverly hiding just under the surface that will burst with a vengeance on November 6th.

The overseas gambling sites would have to be in on it too
 

Jackson50

Member
What's everybody drinking on tuesday?'

I'm thinking of splurging and getting some quality stuff for a good night. Recommendations?
Brandy flip.
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/cr...rats-hold-senate-edge-prior-to-final-weekend/

"In our private conversations with Democratic and Republican leaders, we see two diametrically opposed visions of the electorate — almost parallel universes — and two visions of how the election will shake out. Unsurprisingly, the Democrats AND the Republicans are confident of victory for their party in what is a close presidential contest. Democrats see favorable demographics and sturdy leads in enough states to get Obama over the magic 270-vote mark, while Republicans discern rumblings of a 1980-style wave that will not only ruin Obama, but also drown Democratic Senate candidates and ruin the reputations of many pollsters, particularly on the state level."
Sabato occasionally straddles the boundary between hack and political scientist. I find their classifications slightly incongruous. Regardless, as close as the race appears, they even admit Obama's the favorite in Ohio.
 

mdrudge

Neo Member
http://votamatic.org/can-we-trust-the-polls/

"What would “systemic” polling failure look like? In this case, it would mean that not only are some of the polls overstating Obama’s level of support; but that most – or even all – of the polls have been consistently biased in Obama’s favor. If this is happening, we’ll have no way to know until Election Day. (Of course, it’s just as likely that the polls are systematically underestimating Obama’s vote share, but then Democrats have even less to be worried about.)

A failure of this magnitude would be major news. It would also be a break with recent history. In 2000, 2004, and 2008, presidential polls conducted just before Election Day were highly accurate, according to studies by Michael Traugott here and here; Pickup and Johnston; and Costas Panagopoulos. My own model in 2008 produced state-level forecasts based on the polls that were accurate to within 1.4% on Election Day, and 0.4% in the most competitive states."

http://votamatic.org/another-look-at-survey-bias/

"A relatively small number of survey firms have conducted a majority of the state polls, and therefore have a larger influence on the trends and forecasts generated by my model. Nobody disputes that there have been evident, systematic differences in the results of these major firms: some leaning more pro-Romney, others leaning more pro-Obama. As I said at the outset, we’ll know on Election Day who’s right and wrong."
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Florida really is just a toss up due to the fact that unlike every other state, its utterly inconsistent in the polls. I've never once assigned FL to Obama on any map I've made, so not a big deal.

Whitey/blonde cheerleader sex tape. They'll match up in another day or so, watch.

With Gallup out of the picture the National polls magically have converged with the state polls to make sense.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
Florida really is just a toss up due to the fact that unlike every other state, its utterly inconsistent in the polls. I've never once assigned FL to Obama on any map I've made, so not a big deal.

I gave Obama Florida on my Amirox map, part of me wants to believe.
 

Slime

Banned
http://votamatic.org/can-we-trust-the-polls/

"What would “systemic” polling failure look like? In this case, it would mean that not only are some of the polls overstating Obama’s level of support; but that most – or even all – of the polls have been consistently biased in Obama’s favor. If this is happening, we’ll have no way to know until Election Day. (Of course, it’s just as likely that the polls are systematically underestimating Obama’s vote share, but then Democrats have even less to be worried about.)

A failure of this magnitude would be major news. It would also be a break with recent history. In 2000, 2004, and 2008, presidential polls conducted just before Election Day were highly accurate, according to studies by Michael Traugott here and here; Pickup and Johnston; and Costas Panagopoulos. My own model in 2008 produced state-level forecasts based on the polls that were accurate to within 1.4% on Election Day, and 0.4% in the most competitive states."

http://votamatic.org/another-look-at-survey-bias/

"A relatively small number of survey firms have conducted a majority of the state polls, and therefore have a larger influence on the trends and forecasts generated by my model. Nobody disputes that there have been evident, systematic differences in the results of these major firms: some leaning more pro-Romney, others leaning more pro-Obama. As I said at the outset, we’ll know on Election Day who’s right and wrong."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/28/AR2008102803675.html
 

Dartastic

Member
Yup. Problem is that polling is a lot better today, more professional, and there are too many polls to simply dismiss every one that doesn't benefit your side.
The fact that polling is a lot better today makes me sad because polls point to the fact that the legalization of weed probably won't happen in Oregon. :(

I'm getting to an age where I would much rather come home and smoke a joint to relax instead of drink, but as of right now it's still illegal. I have to worry about drug tests and such now as well, because I'm currently looking for a professional job. I don't even smoke often, but I'd like it to be a viable alternative so I don't have to worry about being tested for this shit, especially as I'm job searching. :/
 

HylianTom

Banned
Ohio's sure to go to Obama. By polling, I'm pretty sure it's even safer than IA and NH.

This race is pretty much a done deal. He might not win each state by as much as he did in '08, so we'll likely have to wait later into the evening for each official call to be made.. but this race is as good as done. It's most likely too late for a "drunk-driving-arrest-type" surprise as well.

For me, the only source of tension left on Election Night is whether the Democrats end-up taking back the House. Well.. that, and for pure vanity reasons I'd like to see he many states I predict correctly.
 

Dartastic

Member
I'm also really curious as to the makeup of the house and senate as well. The obstructionism over the past two years has been mind boggling.
 

Game-Biz

Member

citizen-kane-clapping-gif.gif
 
Romney won't win Florida guys. There's two reasons why, Romney and Ryan; although I'm sure the latter will get much of the blame with his budget when the inevitable happens. Really. Obama won around 9pm central last go around...it'll be the same this time. Obama has the lead amongst likely voters and I'm pretty sure the turnout will be bigger than what's predicted and as we all know Obama is crushing Romney with registered voters. Romney hasn't run a campaign with any ideas but rather just running towards the tea party as he's not Obama and not one concrete detail beyond that. In times of uncertainty...people want a plan, with details!

Obama wins all the swing states(NC to WI and everything inbetween) and gets AZ and GA down to within 5%. Popular vote: 52-46-2(rounded to closest integer)
Senate gets at least 55 seats with AZ, NE, NV being toss-ups.
House sees the Dems gain 22 seats +/- 5 seats.

Bank it.
 

FyreWulff

Member
So, I just woke up an hour ago. Are there people seriously trying to set up the foundation for "Obama won because the votes were rigged" when Romney loses?
 

HylianTom

Banned
So, I just woke up an hour ago. Are there people seriously trying to set up the foundation for "Obama won because the votes were rigged" when Romney loses?
Either "it was rigged" or "too many voters are now on the govt teet" or "{x} number of dead voted in Columbus this year."

Or, as I've heard too many folks (older relatives included) say, "the f--s, n-----s, s---s, and commies have taken over. This country is done for. Why didn't we enforce immigration laws before it was too late? And why do we have early voting? It's called 'Election Day' - not 'Election Month!'"

There's also TONS of Christie-blaming going-on at FreeRepublic right now. They're still positively livid, and blaming him for a lot of Obama's "Sandy/Christy Bump."
 
Either "it was rigged" or "too many voters are now on the govt teet" or "{x} number of dead voted in Columbus this year."

Or, as I've heard too many folks (older relatives included) say, "the f--s, n-----s, s---s, and commies have taken over. This country is done for. Why didn't we enforce immigration laws before it was too late? And why do we have early voting?"

There's also TONS of Christie-blaming going-on at FreeRepublic right now. They're still positively livid, and blaming him for a lot f Obama's "Sandy/Chrisy Bump."

I am happy with myself that it took a bit to think of what s---s stood for.
 

Puddles

Banned
The fact that polling is a lot better today makes me sad because polls point to the fact that the legalization of weed probably won't happen in Oregon. :(

That is some horseshit.

Initiative 502 really needs to pass in WA. I really want to wake up on Wednesday to find that at least one state has legalized marijuana. I hate every fucking idiot Californian who fucked us when it was on the ballot two years ago.
 

HylianTom

Banned
Note to self: I need to see if CSPAN'S has a live stream on its site. That video of the crazy lady rambling on about how evil Obama is reminded me of many of the Washington Journal callers I used to laugh at. I'll have to go back-and-forth between W.J. and Morning Joe. :D

I'm also veeeery tempted to resurrect the "post here if you think Mitt Romney will win" thread. That was some entertaining shit.
 
That is some horseshit.

Initiative 502 really needs to pass in WA. I really want to wake up on Wednesday to find that at least one state has legalized marijuana. I hate every fucking idiot Californian who fucked us when it was on the ballot two years ago.
I voted for it. It sucks that all the medical marijuana people voted against it to protect their profits
 

Paches

Member
That is some horseshit.

Initiative 502 really needs to pass in WA. I really want to wake up on Wednesday to find that at least one state has legalized marijuana. I hate every fucking idiot Californian who fucked us when it was on the ballot two years ago.

I won't rest until I can get gay married while smoking a joint.
 

And another video of a retired general explaining how quickly help arrived, while the Fox host continually attempts to claim there was no response (ie Obama let the people die)
http://mediamatters.org/video/2012/11/02/retired-general-keane-debunks-foxs-outrageous-c/191079

When you accuse the president of the United States of letting US government military personnel die you are crossing a very dangerous line. I understand Fox needs to spin the shit out of this for maximum damage/ratings, but this is disgusting. They're essentially accusing Obama of treason and murder.

The far, fringe right accused JFK of letting US and Cuban military personnel die during the Bay of Pigs but it stayed on the far fringe right. This is being broadcast nearly 24/7 on the most popular television news station in the county. When I read the stuff on twitter coming from the right about this...it sounds an awful lot like these people have a bloodlust for the president, with this "Benghazi-Gate" situation being the final straw, as if they're all demanding "something" be done. The rhetoric is genuinely scary, and will only get more toxic if Obama wins on Tuesday
 

Aylinato

Member
And another video of a retired general explaining how quickly help arrived, while the Fox host continually attempts to claim there was no response (ie Obama let the people die)
http://mediamatters.org/video/2012/11/02/retired-general-keane-debunks-foxs-outrageous-c/191079

When you accuse the president of the United States of letting US government military personnel die you are crossing a very dangerous line. I understand Fox needs to spin the shit out of this for maximum damage/ratings, but this is disgusting. They're essentially accusing Obama of treason and murder.

The far, fringe right accused JFK of letting US and Cuban military personnel die during the Bay of Pigs but it stayed on the far fringe right. This is being broadcast nearly 24/7 on the most popular television news station in the county. When I read the stuff on twitter coming from the right about this...it sounds an awful lot like these people have a bloodlust for the president, with this "Benghazi-Gate" situation being the final straw, as if they're all demanding "something" be done. The rhetoric is genuinely scary, and will only get more toxic if Obama wins on Tuesday


This is the PD I know!
 

Puddles

Banned
And another video of a retired general explaining how quickly help arrived, while the Fox host continually attempts to claim there was no response (ie Obama let the people die)
http://mediamatters.org/video/2012/11/02/retired-general-keane-debunks-foxs-outrageous-c/191079

When you accuse the president of the United States of letting US government military personnel die you are crossing a very dangerous line. I understand Fox needs to spin the shit out of this for maximum damage/ratings, but this is disgusting. They're essentially accusing Obama of treason and murder.

The far, fringe right accused JFK of letting US and Cuban military personnel die during the Bay of Pigs but it stayed on the far fringe right. This is being broadcast nearly 24/7 on the most popular television news station in the county. When I read the stuff on twitter coming from the right about this...it sounds an awful lot like these people have a bloodlust for the president, with this "Benghazi-Gate" situation being the final straw, as if they're all demanding "something" be done. The rhetoric is genuinely scary, and will only get more toxic if Obama wins on Tuesday

But where is Obama supposed to find the motivation to send troops into Libya when Michelle doesn't love him anymore?
 

hym

Banned

Pretty painful and saddening to watch, Geraldo is the only one of the four with war correspondence experience and has not only reported from Libya but from Benghazi during conflicts and knows the situation with the militias. Then you have these 3 know it alls belittling him to defend their blatantly obvious fabricated scandal while making a father of one of the killed Americans so paranoid that he believes the Fox bullshit that Obama was watching how his son died and refused any intervention when the army begged to do so.

And why? all because their machine needs Obama dirt to fill their schedule and keep their base angry about nothing. We reached a point where the average Fox viewer is more upset with the President than the terrorists who committed this attack. What a despicable bunch of people to drag this out for 2 months.
 

ISOM

Member
And another video of a retired general explaining how quickly help arrived, while the Fox host continually attempts to claim there was no response (ie Obama let the people die)
http://mediamatters.org/video/2012/11/02/retired-general-keane-debunks-foxs-outrageous-c/191079

When you accuse the president of the United States of letting US government military personnel die you are crossing a very dangerous line. I understand Fox needs to spin the shit out of this for maximum damage/ratings, but this is disgusting. They're essentially accusing Obama of treason and murder.

The far, fringe right accused JFK of letting US and Cuban military personnel die during the Bay of Pigs but it stayed on the far fringe right. This is being broadcast nearly 24/7 on the most popular television news station in the county. When I read the stuff on twitter coming from the right about this...it sounds an awful lot like these people have a bloodlust for the president, with this "Benghazi-Gate" situation being the final straw, as if they're all demanding "something" be done. The rhetoric is genuinely scary, and will only get more toxic if Obama wins on Tuesday

I could care less what gets worst on tuesday, republicans should not be rewarded on with winning the presidency by fear mongering.
 

Smiley90

Stop shitting on my team. Start shitting on my finger.
Getting rid of all "toss-up" states that I'm absolutely certain will go one way or the other (NV, NH, PA, WI, IA to Obama, NC to Romney), you're left with a swing-state map of FL, OH, VA, and CO.

Obama needs only one of those two win. Romney needs all four.

http://www.270towin.com/2012_election_predictions.php?mapid=bfxr

Thing is, Ohio isn't even a tossup anymore. The only ones left are FL, VA & CO. Even NC is a lot closer than Ohio.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom