I don't really have any problems with the big picture stuff in the film; I'm fine with all the lose ends flapping in the breeze. There's lots of stuff that didn't work though.
--The film would be stronger had the opening scene been the finding of the cave, starting the story small and building outward. Seeing the goo/Engineer early on spoiled later developments and adds little to the film on its own.
I disagree.. That scene would have been out of place later in the movie, and served to show the point of how humans originated. The engineer put the building blocks necessary to create life into earth by drinking the cup and sacrificing himself.
If you launch the movie straight into the cave scene, and then credits, how do you do the "primordial soup" scene and then have it lead into present day? The way they did it was the better way to do it.
--Subtle as a brick to the head character work. Look at the way Alien handled developing its crew and their relationships. We had those with a mercenary, this is just my job attitude there in Parker and Brett, which was developed through very natural conversation and interaction with the crew. Here mohawk geologist tells rattles off his character profile in a couple sentences, telegraphing how he would behave later. Very lazy writing.
There were several characters, though I think some may be reading too much into the original Alien. Parker and Brett were pretty shitty characters that were just wisecracking and didn't care about anything but money. There were several good characters in Alien: the captain, Ridley, and Ash. The rest were just fodder. I love Alien and it's one of my favorite movies, but you can't say with a straight face that every character was subtle and weren't completely transparent in their motives.
--Subtle as a brick to the head science versus faith "debate". Imagine if the entire set of obvious, dumbed down dialogue on the subject was gone, and we just had Shaw's boyfriend being direct and clear in his views, and we saw that Shaw had a cross, and that it was important to her. Push the issue into the subtext of the film and layer it into the way the characters behave, rather than telegraphing it in "THIS IS WHAT THE MOVIE IS ABOUT" dialogue. Again, lazy writing.
I see this some, though it doesn't seem to offend me as much as some in this thread. If the movie had been more ambiguous than it was in it's intentions, you'd have more confusion than there currently is regarding what happened.
The writing wasn't perfect, and I'm looking forward to the director's cut to see what Ridley wanted to do that the studios wouldn't let him.. But I don't think the writing was as shit as most of GAF thinks it was. Lindelof and Spaihts may not have been perfect, but I think a lot of the gripes that GAF has are summed up in Lindelof having some enemies around these parts.
--Too many characters. It's clear most of them are just fodder, but the fodder sticks around for more than half the film, so that when a bunch of them get annihilated by angry mohawk guy, we have no idea who got killed. Why did the captain need two co-pilots? They were superfluous. Who where those guys tending to Weyland when we first see him? I have no idea. The ship was overpopulated by half.
I'm assuming it's because the expedition is being run by a corporation. Corporations like reduncancy in case someone can't perform their duties. The people tending to Weyland seemed to be his bodyguards.
--How did the guy with the survey equipment and the ability to track his exact location and direction get lost in the caves? And why when running away from any hint of alien life forms did one of them decide to play with an obviously threatening alien snake-like creature? Dumb, inconsistent writing.
I don't remember him having a screen read out of what the pods were doing, or whatever they called them. He just released the pods and seemingly developed them, but they seemed to be networked back to Prometheus.
As far as why they decided to play with a snake like creature, they were running seemingly from something big, or so they thought. To see a snake creature coming out the water seemed to intrigue the scientist when he was presented with an undiscovered species coming right to him. The mohawk scientist was trying to get him to leave it alone, but obviously was too late. But honestly, with as strong as that eel like thing was, and with how many of them were in the room, it didn't matter what those guys did, they were going to die. They had no weapons, and they had nowhere to go.
--So they go into cryo for two years, fly deep into space on a billion dollar expedition, and then wake up and get briefed on why they left? It would have been more plausible had they then been told the real reason they came, with their initial unseen mission having been a ruse.
I do agree with this. I wish that they'd explained the mission somehow back on earth before Prometheus left. The opening scene introducing David was fantastic though.
--Charlize's death was so hilarious, and such a wasted opportunity. Why save her only to kill her off that way? The film was leaving only two women alive at the end, who had an antagonistic relationship and differing views of the issues the film presents. Could have been interesting to see them work together for a bit, you know? Nah. *squish*
I agree with you on this, and yet with how they wrote her character, it only makes sense to me. Though I don't like how they wrote her character and how the audience had no relation to like her. I get that she resented David because Weyland liked her (his creation) more than he liked her. So she was jealous.
--There's a line at the end where David's head says something, and Shaw replies, "that's because I'm a human being, and you're a robot." Gee, thanks for spelling that out, we didn't get that distinction and its implications by now.
This seemed to me more like how the crew was constantly giving David a hard time during the whole movie and he just lets out that goofy smile because he can't (or isn't supposed to) show emotions, yet at this point it seems like she was joking with him in some way. I'm not exactly sure why he was helping her at this point though. I'm more curious on other people's opinions on that. Does David's character connect more with Shaw than the others? It seems like he did.
--The film should have ended with the narration and the ship flying into the distance. The cut to the alien birth might as well have ended with a *dun*dun*duuuuunnnn* I think the score did some version of that, actually. Maybe save the ending scene for a credit cookie.
Well when you show the final engineer be orally "taken" by the alien-squid thing, the audience would know that he's going to then morph into something else, or something will grow out of him. So they could have either ended it ambiguusly and not shown what came out, but what happened worked for me. The xenomorph was finally shown that the engineers had apparently drawn on the mural.
--The music score was wildly intrusive. There were many scenes of quiet conversation where this brassy theme is swelling behind the dialogue (such as the mission briefing, and a conversation between the captain and Shaw). Totally overplayed to the point of distraction.
I know I'm in a minority on GAF, seemingly, in that I actually loved the movie and I loved the score as well. *shrugs*
JB1981 said:
human drinks it, slowly transforms into something weird like a hulked out Engineer, but before doing so he has sex with another human and impregnates her with something that resembles a traditional alien but actually turns out to be a massive octopus-like facehugger which then impregnates the engineer and turns into what looks like a more traditional xenomorph
This is where I think that livejournal post hit the nail on the head. The black goo seems to take on some characteristics of the host and what their motivations, fears, aspirations are.