SCULLIBUNDO
Banned
I'm predicting a bit over a billion for The Hobbit. I wouldn't bet 2b.
Unfair is hyperbole.Of course there will be 2D option available. But bringing up 3D as something as 'unfair' is ludicrous.
I'm predicting a bit over a billion for The Hobbit. I wouldn't bet 2b.
People are also mixing their personal preferences. My like ! = box office success.You appear rationale. The same cannot be said for others.
Unfair is hyperbole.
But 3D can nett a significant boost to the gross.
I wouldn't say significant, but it can add a fair amount, of course. Which is just another reason the people predicting TDKR make me scratch my head.
What are you basing this on? Everyone I knew who read the books (which are a lot of people) totally knew about the movie months and months ago and were very hyped for it.
That's Return of the King. I was talking about The Hobbit. I think they're entirely different film 'animals' in very different circumstances.
There isn't as much hype for this one among average filmgoers; it isn't the end of a massive trilogy. It doesn't have the swell of two year-on-year stunner films preceding it. It isn't going to be the action-intensive war film that TTT/RotK were...I dunno. I don't think it'd be wise to apply LotR film status to this one with respect to how the moviegoing public will treat it.
edit-
I hadn't thought of two things:
1. The 3D ticket price being much higher.
2. The family-friendlier rating that'll mean more younger audiences will go.
The Dark Knight(World Wide): $1,001,921,825
Return Of The King(World Wide): $1,119,929,521
I can see The Dark Knight Rises coming close or exceeding TDK's WW gross. The question is will The Hobbit sustain the same numbers as ROTK. It will be close.
My own experiences of course. A lot of people I know didn't read the books but knew about them, and was not aware of a movie coming out. Seemed to be a popular sentiment on GAF as well from what I remember.
It's important to remember that ticket prices were much lower when RotK came out. If The Hobbit sells 90% as many tickets as RotK, it will blow its numbers out of the water.
Avatar had a close to 50M boost from 3D just in domestic. Thats pretty significant.I wouldn't say significant, but it can add a fair amount, of course. Which is just another reason the people predicting TDKR make me scratch my head.
And Hobbit's runtime will also mean less shows per day.People also forgetting that the younger kids whose parents will take them to The Hobbit probably won't be taking them to see TDKR.
Avatar had a close to 50M boost from 3D just in domestic. Thats pretty significant.
IMAX advantage will be nullified by 3D IMAX.TDK also had a decent boost from IMAX showings. The boost will be even bigger this time since IMAX's expansion.
You think your average movie goer will even know what fps is? LOLSo many people forgetting about DAT 48fps.
IMAX advantage will be nullified by 3D IMAX.
I'm strictly taking this discussion as Hobbit vs TDKR. Hobbit will have 3D, TDKR will not. TDKR will have IMAX and so will Hobbit.I'm pointing out that the 3D advantage over TDKR won't be as huge as it would against other movies.
You think your average movie goer will even know what fps is? LOL
While it hasn't sold as many copies worldwide as LotR, the Hobbit is still one of the best-selling novels in the world. I don't think it's likely that TDKR will make up the gap in international appeal. And the marketing for The Hobbit will obviously exploit the connections to the LotR films.
It's important to remember that ticket prices were much lower when RotK came out. If The Hobbit sells 90% as many tickets as RotK, it will blow its numbers out of the water.
They were $.97 cheaper. So domestically, if the same amount of tickets were sold, it would of made about 100 million more. But the decline in ticket sales has to be factored in, along with the fact that ROTK had a lot of repeat viewing because it was the last LOTR film. There is a reason ROTK made significantly more than the other LOTR films. With films with a definitive trilogy, the last film usually is the biggest money maker.
The things that were appealing about Batman Begins and The Dark Knight are gone. It was the villains that people really latched on to. A sequel will have to sell itself all over again.
The reason ROTK made so much was the built up hype from the last 2 movies.
People knew it was the close of a trilogy, so it was an event film. TDKR has the same factor right now, The Hobbit does not. I cant see The Hobbit beating TDKR's WW gross. I can see The Hobbit Part 2 surpassing it though.
You have to understand that the reason for this is because most people have had the opportunity to catch the previous chapters on dvd/tv. That is the reason I saw RotK in theatres, even though I hadn't seen the others.
And now all those people who saw RotK are familiar with that universe and will be out for The Hobbit in droves.
The Hobbit. No contest.
The things that were appealing about Lord of the Rings will still be in The Hobbit. A beautiful countryside, an adventure among curious folk...
The things that were appealing about Batman Begins and The Dark Knight are gone. It was the villains that people really latched on to. A sequel will have to sell itself all over again.
You have to understand that the reason for this is because most people have had the opportunity to catch the previous chapters on dvd/tv. That is the reason I saw RotK in theatres, even though I hadn't seen the others.
And now all those people who saw RotK are familiar with that universe and will be out for The Hobbit in droves.
Worldwide?
What silly person would say anything other than The Hobbit?
TDKR won't even top TDK. Bane doesn't elicit the same level of excitement as the Joker to audiences. The Hobbit is fucking timeless, and appeals to all demographics.
The Joker is what got them in the door for the 2nd film but the movie delivered and created fans and that is why the sequel will out perform Dark Knight. I really wish people would think about what they are saying when they say it won't even reach Dark Knight numbers. So what it does 900 million, only 100 million better than what Inception did? It just makes no sense.
Ledger's performance aside, everyone I know thought it was weaker then Begins.
That can't be right - way too low. Why would you watch Avatar in 2D.Avatar had a close to 50M boost from 3D just in domestic. Thats pretty significant.
That can't be right - way too low. Why would you watch Avatar in 2D.
Why would you watch Avatar in 2D.
Holy shit.Are you sure you're not thinking of PhoenixDark and his prognostication that Avatar wouldn't cross $250m domestically?
Edit: The avatar he had to wear for -- what was it, a year? -- is the best.