Vital Tundra
Member
I really hope the dpad and thumb sticks are in a place that is comfortable.
If they have to bump the retail price to include a better screen, they better use a 720p OLED instead of a 1080p screen that would do more harm than good for the reasons we stated countless times. But they won't, because they need this thing to be cheap.
I agree it needs to be cheap...anything more than $200 and it'll bomb in the handheld market..but then if it's a hybrid designed to also satisfy the home console Nintendo gamers then they've got to give them something else to please/appeal to them...
...otherwise they'd be better off just releasing a stand alone box with a more home console friendly controller for $150 without the handheld aspects.
The added value of a hybrid ...isn't added value at all if you're a home console gamer who doesn't want the handheld aspect or a handheld gamer who doesn't want the home console aspect.
If they have to bump the retail price to include a better screen, they better use a 720p OLED instead of a 1080p screen that would do more harm than good for the reasons we stated countless times. But they won't, because they need this thing to be cheap.
Like the PlayStation TV?
That's why I wish they'd push the screen to 1080p.
If they could make it high res enough for basic VR...the screen could go in a headset and you'd have controllers for it as well. I could really see the point in the split off controllers if their intent was to have a budget VR solution.
Bumping the retail price by $50 to include a decent 1080p screen and a basic VR headset seems worth it IMO..as you're covering all bases then.
The setup is modular: dock, tablet, controllers.
Everybody has been talking about how the dock could be replaced later on, to give you a more powerful experience in front of the TV. But they could just as easily (in fact, more easily) provide an upgrade for the tablet (or release it as a second SKU down the road) to make it VR proof. I'm not saying they will, but it's possible. Maybe they'll wait 18 months longer, ensure they can get a more powerful GPU inside the tablet and at least 2K screens.
No. Definitely no.
Out of curiosity, what framerate would this headset run at?
Maybe they can make an alternate model with 1080p and VR, but I don't want the regular NX to be pricey because of VR and 1080p (which isn't really necessary for a handheld).
10fps, and the screen will only display red.
In line with recent Nintendo naming conventions, it would be called the Nintendo Miigraine.
Even the vast majority of the gamer consumer base would barely be able to tell the difference between 720p and 1080p on a 6-inch screen, especially Nintendo's market.
This is what i said a few posts back:
He's talking about VR though, when the screen would be close to your face.
60fps ala Gear VR..or maybe they could fake it to 120fps ala PSVR. We'd be talking Gamecube quality games in VR at best (if not slightly lower).
But who'd want that? VR is supposed to be immersive and realistic. Going back to low poly, low res textures etc, would be kind of pointless for people wanting VR, no?
Well I don't want the regular NX to be pricier because of the handheld/mobile elements I don't really want... when the guts could just be shoved in a small black box and connected straight to a tv for far less..
..but as I'll be forced to buy those aspects if I want to play the games on the tv...then I'd rather pay an extra $50 and at least get VR as well (as then at least I'd have a use for the screen).
It doesn't have to be realistic. Many Gamecube/Wii games in 1080p look pretty damn good in.
Give me Endless Ocean/F-Zero GX/Mario Kart in 1080p with GC/Wii graphics and VR and I'd be pretty happy with that.
I hope that the VR fad dies quickly enough that I can laugh at everyone treating it like the second coming of Jesus and the most important gaming revolution since its inception.
I hope that the VR fad dies quickly enough that I can laugh at everyone treating it like the second coming of Jesus and the most important gaming revolution since its inception.
It seems like it already is.
It definitely is not dying.
Aha about western 3rd parties in particular:
Seeing people's negative reactions to an NX dev-kit is nothing. I can't wait to see reactions when NX's major third party support comes from mobile game developers.
I'll be 100% honest. I don't care enough to really research this, but just casually looking at gaming and tech sights before VR launched everyone had the biggest hype for it and after it came out it seemed like a collective "ehhhhhh cool but where's the actual software." And now here we are and there's barely any chatter about how revolutionary it's still gonna be.
I'll be 100% honest. I don't care enough to really research this, but just casually looking at gaming and tech sights before VR launched everyone had the biggest hype for it and after it came out it seemed like a collective "ehhhhhh cool but where's the actual software." And now here we are and there's barely any chatter about how revolutionary it's still gonna be.
I'll keep on telling the truth here. People trashed Wii for its mini game collection fests and so far VR is just that. Until companies take it seriously and invest heavily into real experiences, it's going to continue to stay mostly irrelevant.
Well not quite like that..as not all games ran on the Playstation tv and there was already a more powerful alternative home console available...
..but yeah..if the NX hybrid is the only home console we're getting..you might as well take the guts out of the NX, slap it in a box bundled with a more ergonomic controller for the home console market..and sell it for 50-$100 less than this hybrid will cost.
Trust me it isn't. Pretty much every developer in the us is working on VR projects either officially or at least experimenting. Once you get your hands on a Vive, it's easy to see why. Just look around at game developer or fx job postings, it everywhere.
I hope that the VR fad dies quickly enough that I can laugh at everyone treating it like the second coming of Jesus and the most important gaming revolution since its inception.
I certainly don't think it's the second coming...but as someone who no longer plays handhelds..
...if I'm going to have to buy the handheld aspect of NX just so I can pay the games on the tv... I'd rather at least be able to use the screen for VR and see some value in it...
...rather than essentially having the cost of my home console boosted by $50+ so it can have a bit of shiny glass on one side.
They will probably likely do this but at the moment they want a gimmick and the hybrid will be the only option.
I expect
March 2017 - NX Hybrid Tablet (detachable contoller and dock) - $250
Fall 2018 - NX Console with Pro Controller - $150
Fall 2018 - NX handheld (smaller screen not detachable controls) - $180
I certainly don't think it's the second coming...but as someone who no longer plays handhelds..
...if I'm going to have to buy the handheld aspect of NX just so I can play the games on the tv... I'd rather at least be able to use the screen for VR and see some value in it...
...rather than essentially having the cost of my home console boosted by $50+ so it can have a bit of shiny glass on one side.
Your smaller screen handheld would probably need to wait a little linger than that since it needs a smaller node.
It definitely is not dying.
Isn't fall 2018 nearly 2 years after not enough?
They will probably likely do this but at the moment they want a gimmick and the hybrid will be the only option.
I expect
March 2017 - NX Hybrid Tablet (detachable contoller and dock) - $250
Fall 2018 - NX Console with Pro Controller - $150
Fall 2018 - NX handheld (smaller screen not detachable controls) - $180
The fuck?
I find it rude to play handhelds if I'm out with family/friends, I don't travel any great distances/don't need to commute...and at home I'd sooner play on my big screen tv. I'd use the handheld aspect for browsing the internet at most.
Your smaller screen handheld would probably need to wait a little linger than that since it needs a smaller node.
But why don't you play handhelds anymore?
Eh...I feel like the VR crowd blew it by revealing it too early, being too expensive, etc.
There are really many possibilities:
I do think that Nintendo releasing a Vita TV version of NX is possible as a cheaper alternative for families. After all, their definition of a home console seems to be "a box that connects to a TV and has multiplayer."
Seems weird to give up on an entire library of games because you can't play them o a TV, but that's just me.
What's the purpose of the controller parts being detachable from the handheld .
I imagine the main reason is they don't want you to have to buy another controller when it is docked.
There are really many possibilities:
After seeing the 3ds Direct I'm a bit perplexed. I hope there is still a real Pikmin game for NX, and that wasn't the Pikmin Miyamoto was talking about.
And I hope Nintendo finds some better inspiration for NX, because seeing how they just make two of the same game for Wii U and 3ds surely is not confidence inducing.
The setup is modular: dock, tablet, controllers.
Everybody has been talking about how the dock could be replaced later on, to give you a more powerful experience in front of the TV. But they could just as easily (in fact, more easily) provide an upgrade for the tablet (or release it as a second SKU down the road) to make it VR proof. I'm not saying they will, but it's possible. Maybe they'll wait 18 months longer, ensure they can get a more powerful GPU inside the tablet and at least 2K screens.
I thought this leak was proven fake?
So is the September event still expected to happen?
After that Direct with all the 2017 3DS announcements I'll be fucking damned if NX is launching in March.