Was that all vague as well?
Look, I've been there before. I've known (and still do of sorts) info of a certain gaming product because of good relations with their office (plus working with them once). I either just don't say anything or give good worthy info. I was never into this vague/tease game. And honestly, I don't like most of what I'm reading here from certain insiders. I've got nothing against any of you guys, as I don't really know any of you, but it's just my take on it. Insiders should try and look at it from the non-insider's pov. It's always this bone thrown to them covered by 'NDA, sorry'. Problem is, anyone with absolutely no insider info/contact whatsoever can do this. Absolutely anyone. All you have to do is follow certain people, be vague about info, spread said vague info, cover up with NDA and rinse repeat. Some people do it right while others fail miserably. And in the process of all that, you have cyclones and meltdowns caused by said 'info'. Sadly some of these false prophets take satisfaction in all this, while some others want fame etc. Some do it to get somewhere by playing along hoping that takes them somewhere (it really works sometimes).The other sad part is this ruins it for genuine insiders. Speculation is fun when genuine info is spread. It keeps us on track with proper expectations.
I'm not saying Matt doesn't have info, or anyone for that matter. No one will ever know (Unless busted). But as someone who's a mere mortal in the Nintendo scene, I just hope we're not being played with. (And all of this is why I just wait for official info instead)
So I apologize if I come across in a certain attitude. That's my take on this.
If I was naive, yes.
