M1chl
Currently Gif and Meme Champion
REEE, aside this is some next-gen shit : DSurprised this wasn't banned (even though it was auto generated)
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
ResetEra Discussion -- Stay civil. Don't get personal. Keep it in here.
- Status
Javthusiast
Banned
They are offended by everything. Can't see any product without counting how many diverse people there are.
How can one live their life like that? I would go nuts if I were triggered by every little thing on a daily basis.
How can one live their life like that? I would go nuts if I were triggered by every little thing on a daily basis.
Ionian
Member
Well they do believe their opinion actually matters and have managed to drive off anyone with a dose of sanity, either by bans or users just no longer visiting.
All that is left in the remnants is self-important assholes, trolls and the little who still try to reasonably argue a point.
It's top quality content.
All that is left in the remnants is self-important assholes, trolls and the little who still try to reasonably argue a point.
It's top quality content.
Last edited:
Poor guy gets banned for 1 month for suggesting that you don't need a female protagonist in an Assassin's Creed game.
(post #4 in this woke thread)
Assassin's Creed and female representation
Let me get this out of the way to head off the expected rebuttals: Ubisoft's willingness to put men of colour front and centre in their AAA mainline games is awesome (especially given the first game came out in 2007 when gaming was much less diverse than it is now) and I will never deny how...www.resetera.com
The OP there makes a massive error straight off the bat.
Ubisoft can’t force me to play their games.
This idea that you can’t opt-out if they make one lead character and make them female is nonsense.
I can just decide to not buy the game.
So from Ubisoft’s perspective this is now a simple equation.
If the number of people who will not buy the game because of certain choices is greater than the number of new players they will bring in then it’s not a good choice.
In addition, it’s possible to acknowledge that there is no reason at all why a developer shouldn’t make a game with a female lead while also feeling that a male lead is a better choice.
In Odyssey, for example, you have the protagonist taking part in these head to head battles against multiple trained soldiers so, even though the game is a kind of historical fantasy, I feel like a male lead is more “honest”. Horizon got away with it because Aloy is mostly going up against weird sci-fi robots and when she does fight she is using ranged weapons and traps. If you want to do a female protagonist in Assassin’s Creed then for me it should be a pure stealth game.
Nathan Drake is just a more believable Lara Croft.
I dunno. It’s just humorous to me the idea that they can force players to play as female protagonists and this is a great thing. As if we can’t just decide not to buy the game.
I bought the previous 2 Wolfenstein games before Youngblood and I didn’t buy the new one because the protagonists seemed god-awful and annoying.
So it’s not like they scored some points for feminism because I was forced to play as a chick. I just didn’t buy the game and played other things instead.
If the new AC is going to be set during the Viking invasions of Britain and if they want to have a good story then, for me, a male lead character makes most sense.
Especially if it’s going to be all about swinging heavy ass axes and swords around. For pure stealth a female led game could be awesome.
The OP there talks as though Ubisoft have some kind of obligation to write a female-only game.
The truth is that there really is no need to have a female lead since the game is obviously going to be a game about fighting strong dudes with axes and swords and shit. Assuming they want to have at least some kind of historical accuracy.
At the end of the day it’s fine by me if Ubisoft wants to make games tailored specifically for, and made to pander to, people like this. I just wouldn’t buy them.
So, that’s how I’d “opt-out”.
I'm sure a post like this would get me a ban over there anyway so there would be no point in the "debate".
#Phonepunk#
Banned
PoliEra needs a safe space from people posting news about their own candidate
Last edited:
DunDunDunpachi
Banned
lol "Videogame" forum member wants an invite to the "videogame" forum's discord to plot politics and pat themselves on the back.PoliEra needs a safe space from people posting news about their own candidate
Captain Zyrain
Member
The OP there makes a massive error straight off the bat.
Ubisoft can’t force me to play their games.
This idea that you can’t opt-out if they make one lead character and make them female is nonsense.
I can just decide to not buy the game.
So from Ubisoft’s perspective this is now a simple equation.
If the number of people who will not buy the game because of certain choices is greater than the number of new players they will bring in then it’s not a good choice.
In addition, it’s possible to acknowledge that there is no reason at all why a developer shouldn’t make a game with a female lead while also feeling that a male lead is a better choice.
In Odyssey, for example, you have the protagonist taking part in these head to head battles against multiple trained soldiers so, even though the game is a kind of historical fantasy, I feel like a male lead is more “honest”. Horizon got away with it because Aloy is mostly going up against weird sci-fi robots and when she does fight she is using ranged weapons and traps. If you want to do a female protagonist in Assassin’s Creed then for me it should be a pure stealth game.
Nathan Drake is just a more believable Lara Croft.
I dunno. It’s just humorous to me the idea that they can force players to play as female protagonists and this is a great thing. As if we can’t just decide not to buy the game.
I bought the previous 2 Wolfenstein games before Youngblood and I didn’t buy the new one because the protagonists seemed god-awful and annoying.
So it’s not like they scored some points for feminism because I was forced to play as a chick. I just didn’t buy the game and played other things instead.
If the new AC is going to be set during the Viking invasions of Britain and if they want to have a good story then, for me, a male lead character makes most sense.
Especially if it’s going to be all about swinging heavy ass axes and swords around. For pure stealth a female led game could be awesome.
The OP there talks as though Ubisoft have some kind of obligation to write a female-only game.
The truth is that there really is no need to have a female lead since the game is obviously going to be a game about fighting strong dudes with axes and swords and shit. Assuming they want to have at least some kind of historical accuracy.
At the end of the day it’s fine by me if Ubisoft wants to make games tailored specifically for, and made to pander to, people like this. I just wouldn’t buy them.
So, that’s how I’d “opt-out”.
I'm sure a post like this would get me a ban over there anyway so there would be no point in the "debate".
[Banned: Duration Pending. Implying that men and women are not 100% the same in every way. ]
#Phonepunk#
Banned
they are really upset people are discussing these allegations. sounds like Dischord might be a safe space where they can trash Tara.
really leaning in on "the real victims are people voting Biden".
seemingly they are saving what they really want to say for the Dischord. if someone can get on that and get screencaps im sure some interesting stuff would be said.
really leaning in on "the real victims are people voting Biden".
seemingly they are saving what they really want to say for the Dischord. if someone can get on that and get screencaps im sure some interesting stuff would be said.
Last edited:
#Phonepunk#
Banned
no, it is entirely because you need a safe space from people calling you what you are, which is a rape apologist
hilarious equating Pelosi's freezer full of $12 ice cream to a rape accusation.
go on belittling victims, you hero.
Last edited:
#Phonepunk#
Banned
lol and already banned.
Bartski
Gold Member
Hilarious. So having just an option to play as female is not good enough
dottme
Member
And they just announce that there’s a female hero in AC:V.Poor guy gets banned for 1 month for suggesting that you don't need a female protagonist in an Assassin's Creed game.
(post #4 in this woke thread)
Assassin's Creed and female representation
Let me get this out of the way to head off the expected rebuttals: Ubisoft's willingness to put men of colour front and centre in their AAA mainline games is awesome (especially given the first game came out in 2007 when gaming was much less diverse than it is now) and I will never deny how...
TwoDurans
"Never said I wasn't a hypocrite."
After the Battlefield V debacle there's no way ree is going to let anyone use historical accuracy as an argument against female protags.
Haha.
They are so dumb. Just look at the release trailer for AC Valhalla. Main protagonist is fighting head to head against some massive dude on a medieval battlefield. "This should be a female protagonist" is the first reaction? Hilarious.
I get it. AC has fantastical elements. So you can't say it's 100% historically accurate. You can still ask for a sense of realism to some extent, in my opinion.
I mean, why are they choosing a specific period in actual history if not to add some sense of realism?
I do not get this idea that if I play as a woman in a videogame then I somehow "understand different perspectives".
Like, wouldn't a better way to understand women just be um... get to know some actual women?
Suppose you'd need to leave mummy's basement for that.
It occurs to me that we might have a generation of dudes who think because they played Horizon and Tomb Raider that they "understand women".
Then again, we already have a whole gang of males over there who seem to think the best way to "get" women's issues is to simply start identifying as one.
dottme
Member
I was more thinking about the fact that they are already complaining that there is no female hero in AC:V. They have to change it a little. There isn’t enough picture of the female hero. The female hero isn’t present enough in the marketing...
im sure they can find something to complain about.
Thabass
Member
Were they banned? I bet $1,000 they weren't banned.
Bigrx1
Banned
Poor guy gets banned for 1 month for suggesting that you don't need a female protagonist in an Assassin's Creed game.
(post #4 in this woke thread)
Assassin's Creed and female representation
Let me get this out of the way to head off the expected rebuttals: Ubisoft's willingness to put men of colour front and centre in their AAA mainline games is awesome (especially given the first game came out in 2007 when gaming was much less diverse than it is now) and I will never deny how...
Of course, of course this is the main takeaway from the trailer reveal.
#Phonepunk#
Banned
lol @ "based on random tweets" the topic of the thread this mod shut down is literally from Rose McGowan's personal Twitter account.
she even has a Blue Check! that mark of unmistakable quality.
sadly not even that will protect you if you don't tow the line!
she even has a Blue Check! that mark of unmistakable quality.
sadly not even that will protect you if you don't tow the line!
Last edited:
DunDunDunpachi
Banned
True clownworld revelations these past few days.lol @ "based on random tweets" the topic of the thread this mod shut down is literally from Rose McGowan's personal Twitter account.
she even has a Blue Check! that mark of unmistakable quality.
sadly not even that will protect you if you don't tow the line!
raduque
Member
Not only that, but apparently the gameplay is all fucky.
DragoonKain
Neighbours from Hell
Did they miss Origins or assassin’s creed 3?
pulga
Banned
motherfucker if shes a rando what do you think you are, plus threads about tweets get posted all the damn time lmaolol @ "based on random tweets" the topic of the thread this mod shut down is literally from Rose McGowan's personal Twitter account.
she even has a Blue Check! that mark of unmistakable quality.
sadly not even that will protect you if you don't tow the line!
pulga
Banned
used to be all you would see on ERA is "RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA" now they won't even entertain the thought the Biden rape allegations are Russian or GOP interference? It's so boring, you either get in line with "believe all women, period" or get banned. Something like this is political shit-flinging 101, it's worth a discussion.
Maiden Voyage
Gold™ Member
Odds the same guy on Era that said he'd vote for Hitler is the same guy mourning his death anniversary on Insta?
Last edited:
M1chl
Currently Gif and Meme Champion
'member when romance in games were cringe? Like Mass Effect times, sex box, etc...
Imagine playing these games and having that be your problem with them. It's not a fucking dating sim you mong.
Odds the same guy on Era that said he'd vote for Hitler is the same guy mourning his death anniversary on Insta?
Last edited:
#Phonepunk#
Banned
lol i want to know who this guy is friends with, he posts on Era, but for some reason all his instagram friends are big Hitler fans
#Phonepunk#
Banned
so they will do exactly what you are doing?
you're right they have no fucking shame
Nobody_Important
“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
Read the post again. He isn't mourning him. He is upset that people on Instagram are mourning him.
Odds the same guy on Era that said he'd vote for Hitler is the same guy mourning his death anniversary on Insta?
nush
Gold Member
He still signal boosted the anniversary of Hitlers death on Ree though. I just can't...
Ionian
Member
"I'm seeing people on my instagram"
'MY' <- notice the 'my' in the sentence and draw your own conclusions.
Nobody_Important
“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
My conclusion is that he follows some pretty shitty and ignorant people on Instagram?
Musky_Cheese
Banned
Hitler didn’t die in Germany. He left on a submarine. Ffs, watch the History Channel once in your life.
SoggyBiscuit
Banned
The Daily Caller is a banned source?
Must've gotten it mixed up with the daily stormer
There are two possibilities. He follows them because he believes their views, or he follows them because he is addicted to outrage and the feeling of superiority he gets from being outraged by evil. Neither is healthy.
Just to acknowledge my own hypocrisy, following this thread is a bit like the latter. Hey, no one is perfect.
Last edited:
nush
Gold Member
He's obviously a Hitler fan concern trolling. You've cracked this one.
ReadingRambo
Member
Starlight Lotice
Member
Was it Yellow? I must know or else another gender is born out of my ignorance.
JORMBO
Darkness no more
Sorry guys, lawns are racist.
In a forum full of idiotic posts this guy has one of the dumbest ones I’ve read.
MudoSkills
Volcano High Alumnus (Cum Laude)
Has anybody called him on that outstandingly ridiculous take?
Kev Kev
Member
Last edited:
cormack12
Gold Member
That forum is getting trolled to death. Imagine these folks as parents. That's right Jonas, lawns are racist and pay no attention to your evil white kindergarten teachers who tell you otherwise. You listen to Ma and Pa
nush
Gold Member
ERA, do you have a well manicured lawn? Can I convince you to replace it with something more productive, and eco-friendly?
I believe the concept of the lawn was started in Europe by the ultra rich. It was their way of using the land while not having to worry about growing food like the peasants. Here's the thing, I'm not here to shame you for being rich. I'm here to tell you you can make better use of that land even...
www.resetera.com
It's his topic and he clearly does not know anything about what he's posting. Basically, "I don't have a lawn, will never have one, will never be able to afford a property with one" Ergo Lawns are a waste of time.
Cow Mengde is one of the top ten bitter Asian losers on Era BTW.
OutrageousFacts
Banned
It's rare to see someone so proudly show to the world how small his balls are:
www.resetera.com
Whats the reason for showing difficulty in games people are playing?
Talking about on PS4, have no idea if Xbox does the same thing. I dont understand why when im looking at my friend list and see someone playing a game that the dev needs to also list the difficulty someone is playing on. Like for example, if i see someone playing the RE3 Remake it says...
www.resetera.com
JORMBO
Darkness no more
ERA, do you have a well manicured lawn? Can I convince you to replace it with something more productive, and eco-friendly?
I believe the concept of the lawn was started in Europe by the ultra rich. It was their way of using the land while not having to worry about growing food like the peasants. Here's the thing, I'm not here to shame you for being rich. I'm here to tell you you can make better use of that land even...
It's his topic and he clearly does not know anything about what he's posting. Basically, "I don't have a lawn, will never have one, will never be able to afford a property with one" Ergo Lawns are a waste of time.
Cow Mengde is one of the top ten bitter Asian losers on Era BTW.
That OP is a moron. Letting your grass grow wild would lead to it becoming full of ticks and other bugs, along with rats and more bad things. It would also not dry out well and become a breeding ground for mosquitoes.
SoggyBiscuit
Banned
This has to be trolling. How could anybody actually believe this.
Sorry guys, lawns are racist.
DunDunDunpachi
Banned
The lawn thing is weird. Grass is still a plant. A lawn is still sequestering carbon. It is still cleaning the air and providing a home for beneficial insects and microorganisms. It also protects the soil from erosion. That last issue plays a big role in city planning/mgmt since they could be preventing thousands of pounds of soil runoff every year in their city by keeping up the lawns.ERA, do you have a well manicured lawn? Can I convince you to replace it with something more productive, and eco-friendly?
I believe the concept of the lawn was started in Europe by the ultra rich. It was their way of using the land while not having to worry about growing food like the peasants. Here's the thing, I'm not here to shame you for being rich. I'm here to tell you you can make better use of that land even...
It's his topic and he clearly does not know anything about what he's posting. Basically, "I don't have a lawn, will never have one, will never be able to afford a property with one" Ergo Lawns are a waste of time.
Could someone use that same square footage for superior plants? Sure, but I'd challenge them to find an easier one than good ol' grass. People could plant a garden in that same area but that takes knowledge and management. Plus, the constant tilling of the average garden (no-till is the way) puts more nitrogen and co2 into the atmosphere. You could plant a tree but there are limits, plus the long-term risk it poses to any nearby structures. Grass is pretty easy to care for and if you either bag+compost the clippings or mulch them back into the lawn, you are quietly improving the earth by sequestering carbon and improving your soil health.
Seems like a no-brainer for a group that claims to care about the environment.
Also grasslands are a "more reliable" carbon sink compared to forests in modern California. Who knew?
Grasslands more reliable carbon sink than trees
Forests have long served as a critical carbon sink, consuming about a quarter of the carbon dioxide pollution produced by humans worldwide. But decades of fire suppression, warming temperatures and drought have increased wildfire risks—turning California's forests from carbon sinks to carbon...
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll