ROG Xbox Ally and ROG Xbox Ally X launch October 16

PlayStation Portal literally says "remote player" in its name. It could not be clearer. Xbox Rog Ally makes no such distinction. And the people you are calling hypocrites are not saying this device "should play those games natively". Most of us here understand completely what this is: a PC handheld. The discussion is whether consumers will understand what Xbox Rog Ally is and isn't.

C0FNN6Bkf8vGmFwB.png





I mean.....you are saying the same thing reinking reinking and I are saying, but somehow we are hypocrites?

Come On What GIF by MOODMAN





That's typically the case, but throwing Xbox in the name is designed to attract a larger audience.
It can play Xbox games via XCloud just like Playstation Portal can play PS5 games thru console streaming. Both can play games for the it's "brand" system remotely. So why can one use the PS brand and Xbox can't?
To say it's fine for one and not the other is hypocritical.

Does ROG Xbox Ally have to have the word "remote" for it to be better?
 
Perhaps if Microsoft leaned more into "Xbox PC" branding that would help differentiate it from Xbox consoles. I think Rog Xbox PC would have been a better name
That might've been a better name and probably better to avoid confusion.
Although we don't know what MS future plans are. If it can play OG Xbox, X360 and XB1 (doubtful) through emulation would it be better?
I thought I remember somewhere that they are hiring people again for BC and emulation positions
 
because the Xbox team literally made the OS for it... that's why it has Xbox branding.

also when the leaked Playstation handheld releases, it too won't play all your PS5 games, because each game would need a patch to become compatible.
more than 1100 play anywhere games are cross compatible between the Xbox consoles and the Ally. meaning 1100+ games that are available to buy on Series X and Xbox One, will seamlessly work on the Ally, while it's using a special Windows 11 version made by the Xbox team, launching directly into an Xbox storefront environment.

so it absolutely plays Xbox games... just not all of them... just like the PS4 when it released didn't play all PlayStation games, or how the PS3 stopped playing all PlayStation games after its first revision.
did that make those systems "not a PlayStation"? was the PSP not a PlayStation because it didn't play PS2 games?
Even you are confused about what it is. It's a windows os, not an xbox os.
 
It can play Xbox games via XCloud just like Playstation Portal can play PS5 games thru console streaming. Both can play games for the it's "brand" system remotely. So why can one use the PS brand and Xbox can't?
To say it's fine for one and not the other is hypocritical.

Does ROG Xbox Ally have to have the word "remote" for it to be better?

One is clearer about what it does. No one said one or the other was "better". Bizarre for you to make statements about hypocrisy when you don't understand the basic argument of those you are calling hypocrites.
 
One is clearer about what it does. No one said one or the other was "better". Bizarre for you to make statements about hypocrisy when you don't understand the basic argument of those you are calling hypocrites.
Not bizarre at all. If you say it's good for one and not the other because one is "clearer", then I don't know what to tell you.
I've never had a problem with the name Playstation Portal at all. And even in this thread, I haven't said it was an issue. It does what it does and you won't find ever saying anything about it.
 
Not bizarre at all. If you say it's good for one and not the other because one is "clearer", then I don't know what to tell you.
I've never had a problem with the name Playstation Portal at all. And even in this thread, I haven't said it was an issue. It does what it does and you won't find ever saying anything about it.

Eh.....I wasn't the one who started this silly warrior debate in the first place my man.
 
Last edited:
Eh.....I wasn't the one who started this silly warrior debate in the first place my man.
Sorry if it's coming across that way to you, because if it is, that's not my intention at all.
And I didn't start it, I was commenting on people that was saying it shouldn't have "Xbox" on it.

I'll just respectfully agree to disagree at this point.
 
It can play Xbox games via XCloud just like Playstation Portal can play PS5 games thru console streaming. Both can play games for the it's "brand" system remotely. So why can one use the PS brand and Xbox can't?
To say it's fine for one and not the other is hypocritical.

Does ROG Xbox Ally have to have the word "remote" for it to be better?
You seem to be stuck on the fact that the ROG Xbox Ally can stream Xbox games and the Portal can stream PlayStation games and trying to lump them into the same category based on that. The best way I can explain the difference to you is that the PlayStation Portal can only stream PlayStation games. Period. It would not make sense to call it anything else but PlayStation. The ROG Xbox Ally's main function is to play PC games natively and can stream Game Pass just like any other brand of PC. I understand that this is nothing more than a partnership with ASUS but it does make it confusing when early on they included it as part of the Xbox family and were not clear that it would only stream Xbox console games via Game Pass.
 
Sorry if it's coming across that way to you, because if it is, that's not my intention at all.
And I didn't start it, I was commenting on people that was saying it shouldn't have "Xbox" on it.

I'll just respectfully agree to disagree at this point.

That's the thing. We never disagreed about Xbox. I was saying the exact same thing that you were about the Xbox branding possibly being a problem. PlayStation has nothing to do with it.
 
Last edited:
That's the thing. We never disagreed about Xbox. I was saying the exact same thing that you were about the Xbox branding possibly being a problem. PlayStation has nothing to do with it.
It's a problem, I agree.
My only disagreement was that it had to be able to be played native to be an "Xbox" and was pointing out other cases where that wasn't true. PS was the only other gaming example to come to mind at the time which is why it was the example I used.

In the end, they've already named it and will not likely change at this point. Maybe like Sony, they will make it clear in their ads that it doesn't play natively. Although I won't be getting one, I would like to see it succeed as I'd like to see that interface in more devices. I'm retired and mostly at home now, but when I was working and traveling a lot, a device like this would've been a godsend to me.
 
It's a problem, I agree.
My only disagreement was that it had to be able to be played native to be an "Xbox" and was pointing out other cases where that wasn't true. PS was the only other gaming example to come to mind at the time which is why it was the example I used.

In the end, they've already named it and will not likely change at this point. Maybe like Sony, they will make it clear in their ads that it doesn't play natively. Although I won't be getting one, I would like to see it succeed as I'd like to see that interface in more devices. I'm retired and mostly at home now, but when I was working and traveling a lot, a device like this would've been a godsend to me.
The name alone would have been okay if their messaging is more clear.

However, i fear the confusion might be intentional. That Xbox want people to buy the product assuming it has functionality it doesn't have. Just like with pcs that were Vista Capable.
 
"The elephant in the room is that of course, as much as these devices are being called Xbox's, they will not natively run your existing console library. For someone in the industry, I understand the why – of course they won't, they're PCs. But for the average gamer that may expect to be able to just pick up a new handheld come October 16th and play everything they own, they're going to be in for an unpleasant surprise."

 
"The elephant in the room is that of course, as much as these devices are being called Xbox's, they will not natively run your existing console library. For someone in the industry, I understand the why – of course they won't, they're PCs. But for the average gamer that may expect to be able to just pick up a new handheld come October 16th and play everything they own, they're going to be in for an unpleasant surprise."

It's something I don't understand there... Does the "average gamer" refer to a new generation of gamers that expect something like this?

When did a handheld console allow you to natively play the catalog of games purchased on much more powerful home consoles of the same era and brand? In fact, always you had to buy the same game twice separately because handheld consoles have always been independent devices from the home console of the same brand, beyond some compatibility features.

And we're also talking about a very hardcore device. We're talking about extremely rare cases of people who don't know what videogames device they're buying for $900... A 1%? I don't even think people in that 1% will feel remorse when they realize what this device actually offers, whether an Xbox user or not.
 
Last edited:
It's something I don't understand there... Does the "average gamer" refer to a new generation of gamers that expect something like this?

When did a handheld console allow you to natively play the catalog of games purchased on much more powerful home consoles of the same era and brand? In fact, always you had to buy the same game twice separately because handheld consoles have always been independent devices from the home console of the same brand, beyond some compatibility features.

And we're also talking about a very hardcore device. We're talking about extremely rare cases of people who don't know what videogames device they're buying for $900... A 1%? I don't even think people in that 1% will feel remorse when they realize what this device actually offers, whether an Xbox user or not.

Fair points. Maybe the average gamer won't have any expectations and only more informed gamers will be interested. If so then probably not an issue. The point in me posting this is that this isn't something being dreamed up by a few here as much as some would love for that to be the case. Xbox centric outlets are bringing it up.
 
It's something I don't understand there... Does the "average gamer" refer to a new generation of gamers that expect something like this?

When did a handheld console allow you to natively play the catalog of games purchased on much more powerful home consoles of the same era and brand? In fact, always you had to buy the same game twice separately because handheld consoles have always been independent devices from the home console of the same brand, beyond some compatibility features.

And we're also talking about a very hardcore device. We're talking about extremely rare cases of people who don't know what videogames device they're buying for $900... A 1%? I don't even think people in that 1% will feel remorse when they realize what this device actually offers, whether an Xbox user or not.
Pretty much.
 
Fair points. Maybe the average gamer won't have any expectations and only more informed gamers will be interested. If so then probably not an issue. The point in me posting this is that this isn't something being dreamed up by a few here as much as some would love for that to be the case. Xbox centric outlets are bringing it up.
Oh, sure, I understand what you're referring to and the reason for your quote. I was pointing out the paragraph in the article and the part about the "average console user."
Of course, the type of potential Xbox Ally user isn't the "average console user" from the start. And among those potential users, only a small portion might fall into the clear error of "not knowing what they're buying."

That's why I also asked if the new generation has embraced this idea, because it's not something that really exists or has ever existed to generate such a school of thought.

I don't know; I don't think it's something worth discussing, because the number of potential people affected by the XBOX label is totally residual.
 
Oh, sure, I understand what you're referring to and the reason for your quote. I was pointing out the paragraph in the article and the part about the "average console user."
Of course, the type of potential Xbox Ally user isn't the "average console user" from the start. And among those potential users, only a small portion might fall into the clear error of "not knowing what they're buying."

That's why I also asked if the new generation has embraced this idea, because it's not something that really exists or has ever existed to generate such a school of thought.

I don't know; I don't think it's something worth discussing, because the number of potential people affected by the XBOX label is totally residual.

Xbox is breaking some new ground with this console/PC model so there is going to be a lot of speculation about all of it. Probably good that these outlets are making this point so that even the mildly curious "average" person will be informed about what it is. This is the sort of topic that gets some forum/twitter real estate prior to launch and then dwindles after. Expecting the same here.
 
Xbox is breaking some new ground with this console/PC model so there is going to be a lot of speculation about all of it. Probably good that these outlets are making this point so that even the mildly curious "average" person will be informed about what it is. This is the sort of topic that gets some forum/twitter real estate prior to launch and then dwindles after. Expecting the same here.
It shouldn't be the media's job to explain what the hardware does. The Xbox marketing is suppose to do that.
 
It shouldn't be the media's job to explain what the hardware does. The Xbox marketing is suppose to do that.

Disagree. Marketing is often incomplete or misleading. Media's job is to sift through the bullshit and inform their reader/viewer of the facts. In this case, Sarah Bond specifically said Xbox Rog Ally would only be able to stream Xbox console games. Media should definitely reiterate that in the previews/reviews.
 
Disagree. Marketing is often incomplete or misleading. Media's job is to sift through the bullshit and inform their reader/viewer of the facts. In this case, Sarah Bond specifically said Xbox Rog Ally would only be able to stream Xbox console games. Media should definitely reiterate that in the previews/reviews.
Marketing being misleading is to the detriment of the product itself. People are justified to get mad at any product that misrepresents what it does. The media might try to inform the population of this problem, but that doesn't change the fact that the problem exists. If the marketing has issues that is on the people who paid for the marketing.
 

Legion Go and MSI Claw confirmed to get the same Xbox upgrades as the ROG Xbox Ally

Article:
Legion Go S and MSI Claw 8 AI+ confirmed for 'Xbox on handhelds' support
Over on the official 'Xbox on handhelds' page, you can read all about the upgrades coming to the ROG Ally handhelds. This includes features such as the Xbox full screen experience, the aggregated library, and Xbox's Play Anywhere feature. The full screen experience delivers a console-inspired UI, much like what we already see on the Steam Deck.

dvadJBrGDeZi7hTx.jpg

Source: Xbox

Lenovo's Legion Go S doesn't feature the latest flagship Z2 Extreme chip featured in the ROG Xbox Ally X or the upcoming Legion Go 2, but there is a model available with the cut-down Z2 Go instead. The MSI Claw 8 AI+ is powered by older Intel Lunar Lake hardware, but it still holds its own versus the competition and has proven to be comparable to the Z2 Extreme.
 
Top Bottom