Diprosalic
Banned
doing his best Federer impression at break point.
The ball leaves a mark on clay. Not on grass. Not on hard. So hawkeye is used on grass and hard. It's not that difficult of a concept.
but it is still a stupid one.
How is it stupid to not change something that NO ONE is complaining about?
The complaints of bitter fans sitting at home don't count.
i don't care what anyone else is or is not complaining about. none of that has anything to do with how silly it is to still go running after marks in the dirt.
but the most important reason why it should be changed is because it would be more fair. whatever margin of error hawkeye has, it will always make the same call. a different umpire on a different day might see something different in the same mark. hawkeye levels the playing field. plus it saves time when the umpire doesn't have to run down and possibly argue with the players.
Please don't make an argument about "fairness". Like really. Stop.
The ONLY reason people are whining is because a call went against Wawrinka.
i have been whining about the lack of hawkeye not being used on clay for as long as it has been used (before in this thread as well if you care to look), so save me the persecution act. and about people too silly to understand humans are more liable to make mistakes than hawkeye ever will be. therefore, yes, it is more fair.
Enough mistakes to warrant a change? No.
1 mistake out of a million does not justify a change because Hawkeye itself is not perfect.