Rotten Watch: I Am Legend

Status
Not open for further replies.
This movie is amazing, lupe fiasco's the cool, and I AM LEGEND sure gave an awesome end to 2007

Oh yeah as soon as this hits DVD shevles i must cop for the extras alone, excellent movie!
 
Just saw it. I thought Will Smith gave an incredible performance, but the movie itself left me unsatisfied. It felt like so much was left out. The movie needs a prequel AND a sequel.

3/5
 
Movie was pretty good up until the last third or so. Kinda fell apart towards the end IMO. The monsters looked like shit, the long scene where Neville recites Shrek was annoying, and the ending was weak.

Honestly, the best scenes were in the trailer(s). Seeing a deserted NYC was really cool. I also liked all the quiet scenes and the interactions with his dog. It was worth watching for that stuff alone, but don't go into it expecting too much.
 
Just got home from seeing this. I was liking it until the end.. I thought we had another 30-45 minutes left atleast and the credits started rolling =\ :lol
 
I honestly don't know what to think about the movie...I liked it but I dunno I didn't come out of the movies with that closure feeling, something about it feels incomplete, but I can't put my finger on it...
 
I saw the movie and loved every minute of it. One of my favorite movies this year. I enjoyed it so much, I went out and bought the book when I left the movies.

I can see how some people don't like Will Smith as an actor. I, however, think he's fantastic. This movie, the pursuit of happiness, independence day (some people might disagree, but I liked it) he's had some really good movies.
 
Iamthegamer said:
Why do people think there was more to it? I thought the ending was pretty apparently cut and run.
They ending came out of no where and they most of the movie unexplained. Hell unless you've read the book you have no idea wtf is going on til over 30 minutes into it.
 
DarkAngelYuna said:
Hell unless you've read the book you have no idea wtf is going on til over 30 minutes into it.

Heck I'd say that was the point. I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure none of the trailers explained exactly what was going on. That was the draw for a lot of people.

Books and movies don't have to be the same.
 
DarkAngelYuna said:
They ending came out of no where and they most of the movie unexplained. Hell unless you've read the book you have no idea wtf is going on til over 30 minutes into it.

Chick talks about new cancer cure, cut to empty cities,
if you didn't get a fair idea of what was going on straight away from that, well...
 
Saw it last night. What a mess of a movie. Poor Direction. Over done/bad acting. Bad special effects. Silly plotting. Oddly enough reminded me of Children of Men in a weird way but done totally Hollywood style without any heart and soul. Damn you Will Smith!

* Shakes fist at sky.
 
DarkAngelYuna said:
They ending came out of no where and they most of the movie unexplained. Hell unless you've read the book you have no idea wtf is going on til over 30 minutes into it.

So you didn't understand when the doctor said they'd found a cure for cancer, then the world is a desolate wasteland three years/a second later?
 
Stoney Mason said:
Saw it last night. What a mess of a movie. Poor Direction. Over done/bad acting. Bad special effects. Silly plotting. Oddly enough reminded me of Children of Men in a weird way but done totally Hollywood style without any heart and soul. Damn you Will Smith!

* Shakes fist at sky.


I totally disagree with your assessment.
 
McBacon said:
So you didn't understand when the doctor said they'd found a cure for cancer, then the world is a desolate wasteland three years/a second later?
They never explained why or how it actually happened. Why or how a cure for cancer suddenly went evil. They claimed they tested it on like 10k people before making it public. Why didn't it fuck them up before they announced it?
 
I liked that I didn't really know what was going on in the movie, but I thought the cancer -> empty city start was pretty obvious. I really liked this movie, and went in knowing nothing about it (didn't even realize it would have monsters). It had me on the edge of my seat the whole time. Sometimes knowing too much about a movie / story really ruins a movie, as seen by this thread and many of the posters :)

Anyways, the movie was an 8/10 for me!
 
DarkAngelYuna said:
They never explained why or how it actually happened. Why or how a cure for cancer suddenly went evil. They claimed they tested it on like 10k people before making it public. Why didn't it fuck them up before they announced it?

Different strokes I guess. For all the things I think they got wrong or screwed up, not overly going into the medical bits and just dropping you into the world was one of the things I think they got right.
 
DarkAngelYuna said:
They never explained why or how it actually happened. Why or how a cure for cancer suddenly went evil. They claimed they tested it on like 10k people before making it public. Why didn't it fuck them up before they announced it?

It just didn't. Obviously they jumped the gun a bit--it's not everyday one discovers what seems to be the cure for cancer.
 
DarkAngelYuna said:
They never explained why or how it actually happened. Why or how a cure for cancer suddenly went evil. They claimed they tested it on like 10k people before making it public. Why didn't it fuck them up before they announced it?

What's to explain? The cancer cure was a genetically engineered virus. It worked. But once it got out of clinical trials, it mutated. The mutated strain caused the "rage"-like symptoms and aversion to UV light. This was really bad. And then it mutated again & went airborne. That was the end.

I thought the movie made the progression of the disease perfectly clear. That we only saw that through Neville's memories, as opposed to following the epidemic itself more closely, is kinda the point of the movie. It's not ABOUT the plague. It's about what happened AFTER the plague.

Also, what's with this attitude of "everything has to be explained?" I thought that went out with the 80's.

Anyway, really good movie, excellent performance by Smith. 8/10.
 
SteveMeister said:
What's to explain? The cancer cure was a genetically engineered virus. It worked. But once it got out of clinical trials, it mutated. The mutated strain caused the "rage"-like symptoms and aversion to UV light. This was really bad. And then it mutated again & went airborne. That was the end.

I thought the movie made the progression of the disease perfectly clear. That we only saw that through Neville's memories, as opposed to following the epidemic itself more closely, is kinda the point of the movie. It's not ABOUT the plague. It's about what happened AFTER the plague.

Also, what's with this attitude of "everything has to be explained?" I thought that went out with the 80's.

Anyway, really good movie, excellent performance by Smith. 8/10.
I'd like to shake your hand for that great summation.
 
I think I understood mostly everything in the movie, but one question I had was that in the seen where Sam runs into the dark building
if the DSes are asleep, who killed the deer?
 
Has anyone in this thread discussed the overt religious angle? It's the message of the movie--loss of faith, science vs. religion, etc.--that Shrek scene is entirely about finding God again, about God forgiving someone for going astray (when he awakes in bed to Shrek, it's on a scene that mentions forgiveness exactly in this regard) and also the scene he quotes is about how anything can be done/is possible with God, and not alone.
 
SteveMeister said:
What's to explain? The cancer cure was a genetically engineered virus. It worked. But once it got out of clinical trials, it mutated. The mutated strain caused the "rage"-like symptoms and aversion to UV light. This was really bad. And then it mutated again & went airborne. That was the end.

I thought the movie made the progression of the disease perfectly clear. That we only saw that through Neville's memories, as opposed to following the epidemic itself more closely, is kinda the point of the movie. It's not ABOUT the plague. It's about what happened AFTER the plague.

Also, what's with this attitude of "everything has to be explained?" I thought that went out with the 80's.

Anyway, really good movie, excellent performance by Smith. 8/10.

And why did it mutate after over 10k trials. Makes no sense.
 
bob_arctor said:
Forest for the trees, my friend.
Thats another thing, it took forever for the nade to go off after he pulled the trigger. There was no reason he couldn't have just tossed it through the broken glass and went in the hiding spot with the whore and her kid before it killed the vamps.
 
DarkAngelYuna said:
Thats another thing, it took forever for the nade to go off after he pulled the trigger. There was no reason he couldn't have just tossed it through the broken glass and went in the hiding spot with the whore and her kid before it killed the vamps.

Joke character confirmed.
 
DarkAngelYuna said:
Thats another thing, it took forever for the nade to go off after he pulled the trigger. There was no reason he couldn't have just tossed it through the broken glass and went in the hiding spot with the whore and her kid before it killed the vamps.

Well, he couldn't take off and nuke the place from orbit, so staying behind was the only way he could be sure.

And he was never going to leave. It's ground zero. It's his site. He could fix this.
 
Sean said:
Movie was pretty good up until the last third or so. Kinda fell apart towards the end IMO. The monsters looked like shit, the long scene where Neville recites Shrek was annoying, and the ending was weak.

Honestly, the best scenes were in the trailer(s). Seeing a deserted NYC was really cool. I also liked all the quiet scenes and the interactions with his dog. It was worth watching for that stuff alone, but don't go into it expecting too much.

just watched this
+the first hour was amazing
-it was good up until the scene where
will starts running down zombies
- shrek scene was too long
-ending was weeak, did they run out of money or something :lol
-cgi was god awfull

damn shame, the movie had so much potentian

DarkAngelYuna said:
There was no reason he couldn't have just tossed it through the broken glass and went in the hiding spot with the whore and her kid before it killed the vamps.

i thought the same thing while watching it
 
One thing that bugged me:

When Robert was talking to his camera, he explained that the mutated people displayed absolutely no signs of human cognitive thinking. This was immediately after one of the zombies gave him that "Oh don't you fucking worry....I'm gonna get you, bitch!" glares (right after Robert trapped the other zombie). CLEARLY, a menacing, foreboding glare like that is a display of human activity. Why would Robert say that?
 
MIMIC said:
One thing that bugged me:

When Robert was talking to his camera, he explained that the mutated people displayed absolutely no signs of human cognitive thinking. This was immediately after one of the zombies gave him that "Oh don't you fucking worry....I'm gonna get you, bitch!" glares (right after Robert trapped the other zombie). CLEARLY, a menacing, foreboding glare like that is a display of human activity. Why would Robert say that?


:lol :lol :lol :lol
 
MIMIC said:
One thing that bugged me:

When Robert was talking to his camera, he explained that the mutated people displayed absolutely no signs of human cognitive thinking. This was immediately after one of the zombies gave him that "Oh don't you fucking worry....I'm gonna get you, bitch!" glares (right after Robert trapped the other zombie). CLEARLY, a menacing, foreboding glare like that is a display of human activity. Why would Robert say that?
He was in da Nile, and also talking to mannequins.
 
MIMIC said:
One thing that bugged me:

When Robert was talking to his camera, he explained that the mutated people displayed absolutely no signs of human cognitive thinking. This was immediately after one of the zombies gave him that "Oh don't you fucking worry....I'm gonna get you, bitch!" glares (right after Robert trapped the other zombie). CLEARLY, a menacing, foreboding glare like that is a display of human activity. Why would Robert say that?

Well, why would he talk to mannequins and shoot at buildings for that matter? Maybe he was in denial as to who was really inheriting the Earth. Maybe it made it easier on him whenever he experimented on one.
 
Darko said:
i thought the same thing while watching it
He was basically suicidal at that point. The captain going doing with the proverbial ship and city. Especially since he realized he had completed his mission and there was nothing left for him.
 
Stoney Mason said:
He was basically suicidal at that point. The captain going doing with the proverbial ship and city. Especially since he realized he had completed his mission and there was nothing left for him.

This is ground zero. This is my site. I can fix this.
 
bob_arctor said:
Well, why would he talk to mannequins and shoot at buildings for that matter? Maybe he was in denial as to who was really inheriting the Earth. Maybe it made it easier on him whenever he experimented on one.

Well that makes sense. He did seem foolishly optimistic at times.
 
Well you guys gotta think...his metal state was really messed up.

He saw his wife and child killed in that helicopter crash. Then everything went downhill, with everyone else dying because of the virus. He had his dog that his daughter gave to him. That was it. Can you imagine how you would feel being the only person on earth for years, having only your dog, fighting for your survival? The scene after he killed sam, and was talking to that lady mannequin, saying he promised his friend he would say hello, and then asking the mannequin to please say hello back was a really gripping scene. The scene's like that are why I really like Will Smith as an actor.
 
j-wood said:
Well you guys gotta think...his metal state was really messed up.

He saw his wife and child killed in that helicopter crash. Then everything went downhill, with everyone else dying because of the virus. He had his dog that his daughter gave to him. That was it. Can you imagine how you would feel being the only person on earth for years, having only your dog, fighting for your survival? The scene after he killed sam, and was talking to that lady mannequin, saying he promised his friend he would say hello, and then asking the mannequin to please say hello back was a really gripping scene. The scene's like that are why I really like Will Smith as an actor.


The problem I had is that, it had all those elements that showed he was breaking down mentally but it never went anywhere really. That's the common thread with the movie. There's a lot of stuff that they do, but never fully explore.
 
fistfulofmetal said:
The problem I had is that, it had all those elements that showed he was breaking down mentally but it never went anywhere really. That's the common thread with the movie. There's a lot of stuff that they do, but never fully explore.
He went from mental breakdown to "ooh I'm a scientist again" from one scene to the next. The movie wasn't brave enough to go all the way with it.
 
LakeEarth said:
He went from mental breakdown to "ooh I'm a scientist again" from one scene to the next. The movie wasn't brave enough to go all the way with it.

Or, it could be a reference to the fact that he was a military man. He was a high ranking officer, so I sure he played his part in a few wars. Which would force him to go from a mental breakdown to the mindset he had to have in order to survive.
 
I was surprised at how much I liked the movie... that was until the big zombie attack at the end.

What a generic hollywood action climax.

As someone said: the movie was too scared to take it all the way
 
got to see this a few days early here in the UK,

after the trailors a whole bunch of us couldnt wait to see this film.

The first 2/3 of the film were ok, some tense scenes, letting the audience figure things out from themselves and really pushing things along nicely tho it all has that hollywood shean over it (where I prefer that Childeren of Men/28 days later gritty real look).

Then for the last 1/3 it just looses the plot I think and goes to bog standard action film bolocks.

So in the end it was good but not great (might have even prefered 30days of night over this, in fact yeah I did).

I would have prefered makeup instead of CG, I think Will Smith was the wrong choice, I woudl have prefered a everyman type character and didnt really feel a connection with big Willy at all.

Curious about the book tho (and how faithful the film is), my buds a fan of it and was trying to tell me about it but I shut him up in fear of spoilers.

Its out everywhere Boxing day in the UK, I think it will do well from the trailor & the frsh price alone, tho it deserves to much better than a lot of the shit out there but I was expecting more.
 
saw it today, awesome movie.

about the ending.
Why did he had to kill himself though? He could just had locked himself into the safe as well waiting for morning
 
SantaC said:
saw it today, awesome movie.

about the ending.
Why did he had to kill himself though? He could just had locked himself into the safe as well waiting for morning


Because he realized that
they only wanted him. If he hid, they wouldn't have stopped trying to get to them. He didn't want to take that chance
 
SantaC said:
saw it today, awesome movie.

about the ending.
Why did he had to kill himself though? He could just had locked himself into the safe as well waiting for morning
I think he felt he had finally served his purpose. The only reason he kept going was because he wanted to find a cure and try to reverse things. That's the reason he didn't leave with his wife and daughter. He found the cure and his mission had been complete. His wife and child were dead. His dog, which had been his only companion for three years, was dead. He really didn't believe in the colony. And there were dozens of dark seekers out there. He knew that they would continue to hunt him, no matter where he went. The one had a vendetta against him and wouldn't stop until he got him. So he just felt he would take as many as he could and give some hope for the woman and her son.
 
Great movie. You don't see too many somber movies like this anymore. And after reading all the crap about the ending I thought it would suck but it was ok but I would have probably ended it right after that grenade which was surprising. Seeing that kind of echoed back to the old movies that didn't always end on a happy note so it was great to see that it was not entirely cookie cutter.

And some of you saying he went crazy too fast you got to be kidding me. Not seeing or talking another person for months and years? No fucking way. I would have probably hanged myself within the first year. And I cant believe some of you have to be lead and have everything explained. Use your head. We found a cure for cancer then "oh snap" half the population is dead. That needs no narrative in my opinion.

Also I cant help but think that what if that was Christian Bale playing that same role and in the same way that Will did. Will is great but Christian Bale has so much character and expression in him that I think it would have been a damn masterpiece. I think he would have had many in actual tears because even though I felt for the character I didn't think Will acting was quite strong enough to bring out emotion. Actually I take that back, the part where he got pissed at Fred for being where he put him was kind of crazy in more ways the one.:lol

One of the best movies of the year for me personally. I loved it and I hope there is another cut of it.
 
I wish people actually liked good movies. Anyone who enjoyed this flick is so fucking worthless it really is sad. HORRIBLE flick. But I guess it's no surprise why Everyone Loves Raymond was the best rated TV show for so long. There are a lot of stupid people, even on GAF. :(
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom