bob_arctor
Tough_Smooth
effzee said:circle jerk?
May very well be! Does anyone have a logical explanation for that though? Were they feeding???
effzee said:circle jerk?
It didn't sound like that. Sounded like some kind of chant.bob_arctor said:May very well be! Does anyone have a logical explanation for that though? Were they feeding???
JdFoX187 said:It didn't sound like that. Sounded like some kind of chant.
:lolJohn Harker said:jeeze people, they were sleeping.
Their bodies run at a higher temperature/rate than ours do. Didnt you notice how quickly the female who was captured - and heavily sedated - was still breathing?
Those guys were just chillin out, takin a nap. It WAS daytime, after all.
They must sleep on their feet due to their hyper active metabolisms, they don't need to lie down to rest.
John Harker said:jeeze people, they were sleeping.
Their bodies run at a higher temperature/rate than ours do. Didnt you notice how quickly the female who was captured - and heavily sedated - was still breathing?
Those guys were just chillin out, takin a nap. It WAS daytime, after all.
They must sleep on their feet due to their hyper active metabolisms, they don't need to lie down to rest.
Would the Dark Seekers take on a lion? They seem to have some resemblance of intelligence. I doubt they'd even send their dogs after a lion.Jamesfrom818 said:I loved this movie up until.Sam died
I wonder if the lions were immune as well. It would have been awesome to see a lion get infected and slowly transform.
davepoobond said:as a side note, i would love to have a free-roaming game that had the movie's theme.
Some?JdFoX187 said:Would the Dark Seekers take on a lion? They seem to have some resemblance of intelligence. I doubt they'd even send their dogs after a lion.
Stinkles said:Fuck that. I wouldn't go into buildings, period. It would be a daytime driving sim with night time sleeping and hiding minigame.
Thats only the idea though, not the ending. What is the original actual ending.TheWolf said:in the book, the vampires view Nevell as the monster since he is a day walker that goes into their homes at night and kills them. so, he is a legend like we view vampires or other monsters as a legend.
davepoobond said:i think it was enjoyable, but lacked some things that made it a "watch it once, but don't bother buying the dvd" kinda thing...
1. the ending was a let down. The movie was great up until that happened. As soon as it did, i was thinking "wait a second....this is Children of Men meets WaterWorld."
2. they didn't expand on a couple of things i would have liked to have known, like who the fuck the woman was, where the kid came from, how they survived? the flashbacks really didn't go anywhere, except for understanding how he came into keeping the dog.
3. the zombie vampire hybrid guys were a little over the top. they were pretty creepy, but it wasn't that believable to see all these people all of a sudden jumping around like crazy only after 3 years or at least some sort of extra expansion on how the virus actually affects humans just for the believability factor.
4. no investigation into how he was trapped was a big misstep in my opinion. He should have had more investigation as to why they were acting like that
i'd say 8.5/10
as a side note, i would love to have a free-roaming game that had the movie's theme.
Jamesfrom818 said:That bothered me as well. Just a few days before (I think) he was saying how they were devoid of any human characteristics. My guess is that they did film something that covered the subject but it was edited out.
Also, a television show would have been awesome. Like the next Lost or something.
Suburban Cowboy said:so why was he on the cover of Time? And why were there so many damn zombies on the island?
John Harker said:jeeze people, they were sleeping.
Their bodies run at a higher temperature/rate than ours do. Didnt you notice how quickly the female who was captured - and heavily sedated - was still breathing
Timedog said:I think you could infer thatsince they set up an elaborate trap, the monster was holding the dogs like an owner would, and they followed him home, he was simply wrong. It's not like he had a shitload of data to back the claim up that they were devoid of human characteristics.
Jamesfrom818 said:You know, as smart and prepared as Robert Neville is,I really wonder why he never prepared a safe house just in case he found himself out at night. Could've stayed there for awhile its dark out and then go back home during the day so he wouldn't be followed home
WickedAngel said:One more thing; they pretty much explained absolutely nothing about the capabilities of the Dark Seekers aside from limited intelligence. These things were supposed to be mutations of humans; how in the fuck were they bashing their bodies/heads into things and showing no signs of damage? If you run into a truck at full speed, you're going to break your shoulder at the very least.
pxleyes said:Thats only the idea though, not the ending. What is the original actual ending.
Blader5489 said:What is the alternate ending (if there was one)?
Stinkles said:Fuck that. I wouldn't go into buildings, period. It would be a daytime driving sim with night time sleeping and hiding minigame.
Timbuktu said:I agree with those feeling that this is a good entertaining movie that could have been a great film. The idea that Smith's character is so lonely that he is starting to lose his mind didn't really play for me because there was little of it outside of the mannequin and Shrek scenes. I keep thinking that the woman and child are imaginary since they appeared so conveniently and seem to represent everything Neville has lost i.e. faith and family. The concept of Neville being a legend in the novel is definitely more interesting than the cure, although I would have preferred an ending somewhere in between the bleakness of the novel and the unearned optimism of the movie. It is frustrating to think that how much this film could have done with another ten or twenty minutes.
No that's the book ending. There is a completely different movie alternate ending that was mentioned a page or so back.Timbuktu said:It's in TheWolf's spoilered post.
This is one of the best posts I've ever seen on an Internet forum. You fucking nailed it, bro.Timedog said:It was okay. The ending kinda sucked, but the rest was great. Worth watching.
If:
-You're a racist
-You're a film elitist who can't enjoy any film that the general public likes
-75% of your posts on GAF are complaining about shit
-You can't enjoy movies based off of books(everyone knows books are always better, big deal)
-You're one of those who think their opinion is truth, and carries much weight on the internet
-You lready decided it's gonna suck, simply because Will Smith is in it
Than I cannot reccommend this film. If you do not find yourself in any of those categories(which excludes 75% of GAF), than you will probably enjoy the film sans the ending.
fistfulofmetal said:Yep. The first 2/3 was the best part, then it started to get... not good.
Smith carried the entire movie on his chiseled perfectly shaped shoulders.
Timedog said:It was okay. The ending kinda sucked, but the rest was great. Worth watching.
If:
-You're a racist
-You're a film elitist who can't enjoy any film that the general public likes
-75% of your posts on GAF are complaining about shit
-You can't enjoy movies based off of books(everyone knows books are always better, big deal)
-You're one of those who think their opinion is truth, and carries much weight on the internet
-You lready decided it's gonna suck, simply because Will Smith is in it
Than I cannot reccommend this film. If you do not find yourself in any of those categories(which excludes 75% of GAF), than you will probably enjoy the film sans the ending.
Gantz said:-Just because Will Smith is Black, lol whatever. A bad actor is a bad actor no matter what ethnicity he is.
-We like good movies whether it's a blockbuster or indie, just not shitty ones.
-Yes because there's too much of it these days and it's sad people eat it up.
-It doesn't have be 100% accurate just as long it's well written and portrayed on film.
-I don't care what the average joe who hasn't studied or have an active interest in film think. All they want to see is shit blow up.
-Will Smith hasn't been in anything good since Fresh Prince.
JdFoX187 said:While I don't necessarily agree with Gantz's opinions, c'mon guys. Someone can criticize an actor, even if he is black. Denzel Washington and Morgan Freeman have both made some horrible movies and have turned in horrible performances. ZOMG...I zeh racist now?
JdFoX187 said:While I don't necessarily agree with Gantz's opinions, c'mon guys. Someone can criticize an actor, even if he is black. Denzel Washington and Morgan Freeman have both made some horrible movies and have turned in horrible performances. ZOMG...I zeh racist now?
See...that's what I'm talking about. I'm automatically labeled a racist because I offered a different opinion. I didn't say Smith was a bad actor, just saying that these actors do turn in bad roles from time to time. I like Will Smith and loved I Am Legend...just saying, just because he's black doesn't mean he can't be criticized, same with others.mckmas8808 said:Yeah and Will Smith is really a bad actor? Please!
effzee said:one thing i guess i expected/wanted was to see how they went from the evacuation scene to the 3 years later scene.
robert hints at "nothing went as it was supposed to"...implying that they had some plans and they all failed.
where did all the bodies go?
I wouldn't say Denzel Washington nor Morgan Freeman are the best in the business. There are a lot of other actors out there right now that deserve that honor more than those two.harSon said:Correction, every single actor in existence has been in terrible movies and given less then stellar acting performances. Doesn't change the fact that they are two of the best in the business. Will Smith, while not the best in the business, can act and has proven so on several occasions.
I humbly disagree, in regards to Morgan Freeman.JdFoX187 said:I wouldn't say Denzel Washington nor Morgan Freeman are the best in the business. There are a lot of other actors out there right now that deserve that honor more than those two.
The guy has the best narrating voice since Richard Burton and is one of the best actors of this generation. But, I would say Tom Hanks is a much better actor. I'd even go as far to say Johnny Depp is a better actor.Gattsu25 said:I humbly disagree, in regards to Morgan Freeman.
JdFoX187 said:I wouldn't say Denzel Washington nor Morgan Freeman are the best in the business. There are a lot of other actors out there right now that deserve that honor more than those two.
JdFoX187 said:See...that's what I'm talking about. I'm automatically labeled a racist because I offered a different opinion. I didn't say Smith was a bad actor, just saying that these actors do turn in bad roles from time to time. I like Will Smith and loved I Am Legend...just saying, just because he's black doesn't mean he can't be criticized, same with others.
Gantz said:Morgan Freeman should have starred in I am Legend.
mckmas8808 said:Uhhhhh....... feeeemale perhaps?
JdFoX187 said:The guy has the best narrating voice since Richard Burton and is one of the best actors of this generation. But, I would say Tom Hanks is a much better actor. I'd even go as far to say Johnny Depp is a better actor.