Xbox being the only place (console-wise) where you can play EA games would be ridiculous.
How could anyone actually think they'd make the sports franchises exclusive?
Like, what has transipred in the last 5 years or so that makes any reasonable perosn think they would pay $35 billion plus on EA and then lock down the part of EA that makes the most money? RIGHT after seeing them buy Minecraft for 2.5 billion and leave it multiplat?
I mean....just....christ.
MS purchasing EA would be massive if it happens.
MS had over 90 billion dollars overseas and Trump just gave companies a one time tax holiday to bring this money back to the US and spend it. It would cost MS 40 billion to buy EA, 15 billion to remaster every single EA game ever made in 4k and make it available for purchase for $10 or playable for free with Xbox Gamepass, which would instantly become the Netflix for gaming.
Spend another 15 billion to make a cutting edge Liquid Cooled Next Xbox using a 5-7nm Zen+ CPU, 20GBs of HBM2 and 20 TFs of GPU Horsepower alongside a 4k per each eye, 120fps wireless VR headset with a 160 degree FOV and a few more billion to integrate Xbox Live into Origin for PC gamers and offer crossbuy between all PC and Xbox games. This would guarentee a 150 million install base for the next Xbox/Origin/Gamepass which would probably pay for itself within a decade.
If MS is willing to spend 10-15 billion to remaster in 4k or make a sequel to every single beloved IP that EA owns, even beloved dead ones like Burnout, Red Alert, Dead Space, Populus, C&C, Ultima, Wing Commander, System Shock, Merceneries, Skate, SSX, Medal of Honor, TimeSplitters, Warhammer and many others, they could easily get most gamers to jump ship for nostalgia alone. As a bonus, if MS paid to get the Bond license back, they could rerelease so many classic Bond games alongside Goldeneye. But if they fail to remake all those beloved and ignored franchises, the purchase will fail imo.
If they were really smart, they would pay bank to lock up Bluepoint to get 4k 60fps remasters of every great EA game ever made for the next Xbox and dominate the market using nostalgia alone, starting with Red Alert 3 (the greatest RTS ever released on consoles) and Burnout 3/Revenge (the open world crap that was Burnout Paradise destroyed the greatest arcade racing franchise in history, whoever thought it was a bright idea to make an arcade racer where you constantly have to look at the map or you risk missing a turn and screwing up the event you wasted 20 minutes trying to get to the starting point of).
To... sell consoles... get more Game Pass subscribers... regain market share...How could anyone actually think they'd make the sports franchises exclusive?
Like, what has transipred in the last 5 years or so that makes any reasonable perosn think they would pay $35 billion plus on EA and then lock down the part of EA that makes the most money? RIGHT after seeing them buy Minecraft for 2.5 billion and leave it multiplat?
I mean....just....christ.
To... sell consoles... get more Game Pass subscribers... regain market share...
The contracts (At leas the FIFA one anyway which is easily their biggest) literally don't allow them to be exclusive.
MS buying Valve is like a headline from Hell
Good thing it's not possible in this timeline
Because that would sell consoles.
To... sell consoles... get more Game Pass subscribers... regain market share...
I wouldn't consider Minecraft to be the only model.No, you two are right. How dumb of me.
Totally explains why they made Minecraft exclusive after spending 2.5 billion dollars on them.
Completely logical train of thought to conclude that after spending 2.5 billion on Minecraft (one of the top 5 biggest games in the world) and keeping it multiplatform, they would then spend 40 billion or more on EA and prevent themselves from ever making that money back by keeping all the sports franchises exclusive to Xbox.
How could I be so dumb and not see this?
No, you two are right. How dumb of me.
Totally explains why they made Minecraft exclusive after spending 2.5 billion dollars on them.
Completely logical train of thought to conclude that after spending 2.5 billion on Minecraft (one of the top 5 biggest games in the world) and keeping it multiplatform, they would then spend 40 billion or more on EA and prevent themselves from ever making that money back by keeping all the sports franchises exclusive to Xbox.
How could I be so dumb and not see this?
It wouldn't be a monopoly.Surely the FCC will not allow the purchase for monopoly reasons, so.....
I wouldn't consider Minecraft to be the only model.
The heads of Xbox obviously know the narrative this gen is Xbox last games. This would game, set, match that narrative.
Personally, I think they keep it multiplat but offer the portfolio as part of game pass on Xbox and PC.
No need for the sarcasm.
Minecraft works because it appeals to a broader group of people. EA has a lot more buying power for consoles with Battlefield, FIFA, Madden, Anthem, Mass Effect, etc, etc. Just like how Bayonetta is a insta sell for them for the switch.
Right. I think Game Pass is bigger than console wars. They want 50 million subscribers. They want to slowly raise rates like Netflix. But that also means they need to get as many Xboxes out there as possible.1) Microsoft isn't interested in console wars. They're interested in making money
Yes, this.1) 3) Keeping those games multiplat while also offering them on GamePass day one allows them to keep making money on other platforms while also giving THEIR platform an attractive "exclusivity" arrangement. I mean, if you own and Xbox and a PS4, you'd actually be crazy to buy FIFA and Madden on PS4 when you can just get both (plus way way more) for just $10US a month
Im sure MS could manage EA/valve better than those 2 companies have been managing themselves for the last few years.
i'll have some hi-tech hate for MS if they buy valve and turn them into the window store! valve will become obsolete, erased, extinct.Would this not count as monopolising to an extent? I could only imagine the Sony response to Microsoft buying out one of the biggest publishers in gaming. Buying EA makes sense if you're looking to drop hardware development. EA lose a massive chunk of the market cutting out Playstation and Nintendo.
Valve is more probable, although you never know. They value their independence and Steam is great compared to the Microsoft store.
PUBG I can see. But why wouldn't Microsoft realistically open multiple studios and develop their IP catalogue?
Would that not only prompt Sony to start buying up publishers in response?
This would be ALOT bigger than Minecraft. It'd be several 10s of billions. That said if they do it makes no financial sense for them to make EA exclusive similar to how it would have been disastrous to make Minecraft exclusive. If they bought EA they would most likely remain multiplatform because that is why EA is so big. Being Xbox/PC only would cut their revenue more than half.Microsoft buying EA would be huge, but given how they leveraged Minecraft, I think Microsoft buying PUBG Corp. makes a lot more sense and is a hell of a lot more realistic. If they just apply the exact same Blueprint to PUBG that they did to Minecraft, they could very well have similar (read: strong) results.
Damn if they do take EA that means all Maddens will be X1/ PC only?