If by advantage you mean they are able to treat their medical condition while still competing in the sport they love, then yes.
If only Lance Armstrong had thought of this.
Same article
The standard isn't what you consider to be a PED, there is an entire agency that determines that. What about Ritalin and Adderall, does being more attentive give them an advantage by your standard? They didn't violate any rules and disclosed everything, there really isn't any smoking gun or "the jury is still out" moment here...not really sure what you're expecting.
Athletes shouldn't be allowed to take their medication because I believe I am smart.What do these posts even mean?
Anyone want to translate them into English for me?
They're not completely incomparable. Sharapova (iirc) had a medical exemption for meldonium while it was legal. Unlike the cases presented here though, she used it after it became banned.
That said, unlike Sharapova, they did nothing (legally) wrong.
I'm gonna let you in on a little secret, but this is sensitive info so don't go telling everyone:Would be nice to see studies performed to back this up with actual data. Would this create equity among athletes or do those with a condition have an edge regardless? The fact that all of these people are also at the top of their sport internationally raises questions about fairness.
Would be nice to see studies performed to back this up with actual data. Would this create equity among athletes or do those with a condition have an edge regardless? The fact that all of these people are also at the top of their sport internationally raises questions about fairness.
The people in this thread suggesting people should stop taking prescribed medication just because they play sport...
Jesus fucking wept.
Would be nice to see studies performed to back this up with actual data. Would this create equity among athletes or do those with a condition have an edge regardless? The fact that all of these people are also at the top of their sport internationally raises questions about fairness.[
ITT: People fail to realize the purpose of medication.
(Hint: It's not to give an advantage to people with conditions over healthy people.)
micheal phelps, most decorated Olympian of all time must have 2 step verification.
ADHD - that life threatening disease that require medication in time for Olympics.
If everything is legal doesn't make it also fair or moral.
Would be nice to see studies performed to back this up with actual data. Would this create equity among athletes or do those with a condition have an edge regardless? The fact that all of these people are also at the top of their sport internationally raises questions about fairness.
Depending what she took for ADHD that is another fine line for me. Anything that is going to sharpen your focus is a huge advantage. Also there is no test for ADHD, there is no proof a person has it. ADHD drugs are so rampant in eSports they are talking about bringing in drug testing. We are talking about eSports banning them and this is about the Olympics. I still see Simone as the greatest gymnast alive today but this does make you wonder.
ADHD - that life threatening disease that require medication in time for Olympics.
If everything is legal doesn't make it also fair or moral.
If only Lance Armstrong had thought of this.
Thank you Russia for exposing this bunch of black-hearted cheater thugs monkeying around in the dark with that innercity dope-ing
Next hack some video feeds to show them shuffling and lazing about during the national anthem
I'm gonna let you in on a little secret, but this is sensitive info so don't go telling everyone:
There are athletes worth taking medications under exemption that don't win anything
Russia hate train choo choo
Sigh
Shaparova never had a TUE from the anti doping agencies before meldonium was banned, why would she need one for a legal drug (on the watchlist)? She had a prescription from her own doctor
ADHD - that life threatening disease that require medication in time for Olympics.
If everything is legal doesn't make it also fair or moral.
It is if you're an ignoramus.State sanctioned doping programs with FSB support to drill holes in walls and swap samples really seems similar to a few pre-approved exemptions based on legitimate medical issues.
That seems like a reasonable stand to take.
It's not the purpose, but what it creates an advantage?
Nah, it really doesn't.
Yeah, I'm sure that given the opportunity to smear an American Olympic athlete of Phelps' caliber, the Russian hackers have decided to give him cover because he's a white male instead. That makes sense.
You do realize that drugs or no drugs there will always be someone at the top right?
Is everyone who is successful cheating? There is little evidence to support such a theory,
Depending what she took for ADHD that is another fine line for me. Anything that is going to sharpen your focus is a huge advantage. Also there is no test for ADHD, there is no proof a person has it. ADHD drugs are so rampant in eSports they are talking about bringing in drug testing. We are talking about eSports banning them and this is about the Olympics. I still see Simone as the greatest gymnast alive today but this does make you wonder.
You're looking at this too narrowly. These are (so far) only three people out of hundreds of athletes that brought home medals this year.
Well as a Father of a national level gymnast, my daughter spent countless hours at a sports psychologist trying to improve her focus, having her declared ADHD would have been much easier. That being said most great athletes have some level of ADHD, you have to in order to practice they way they do.
Depending what she took for ADHD that is another fine line for me. Anything that is going to sharpen your focus is a huge advantage. Also there is no test for ADHD, there is no proof a person has it. ADHD drugs are so rampant in eSports they are talking about bringing in drug testing. We are talking about eSports banning them and this is about the Olympics. I still see Simone as the greatest gymnast alive today but this does make you wonder.
Try spending time with my brother when he's not on medication. Dude's a grown man but devolves into a hyperactive child when not medicated.
Basically the bolded is the equivalent of "You can't prove autism exists, what you call autistic people are just weird."
Irrelevant. This has been allowed for years and years.You say this like it matters lol. Just because I give a random guy PEDs it doesn't turn them into Usain Bolt, and you are not being clever for mentioning it. No one is saying they don't have innate talent, but what they can do is help it along.
One of the earliest and most notorious Lance incidents was when he got busted for using cortisone. He used his influence to get a backdated TUE that stated it was for saddle sores.
Armstrong used a backdated TUE to escape a positive test.
The Olympics would be better if we only allowed healthy people with no medical conditions to compete. There's a certain purity to disqualifying people based on genetic and biological standards that I make up in my head.
Irrelevant. This has been allowed for years and years.
Depending what she took for ADHD that is another fine line for me. Anything that is going to sharpen your focus is a huge advantage. Also there is no test for ADHD, there is no proof a person has it. ADHD drugs are so rampant in eSports they are talking about bringing in drug testing. We are talking about eSports banning them and this is about the Olympics. I still see Simone as the greatest gymnast alive today but this does make you wonder.
How would you prove that, and would you bar someone from taking medication for ADHD?
I took Adderall once before playing intramural roller hockey and I scored 5 goals. Adderall is that one drug I always thought athletes could abuse and see impressive results.
I'm not claiming to know anything about Biles' mental health (she may not even be taking Adderall, there are non-stimulant meds for ADHD), just an aside.