Nova Bovington
Member
So the beginner's guide, as an "exposé", is pretty damn interesting and made me cogitate a bit. Mostly on what it's about. Spoilers for the following
What's interesting is that the theme swings wildly from beginning to end, and even post-game. At first it presents itself as some sort of documentary/biography on some introverted indie developper who makes these incomplete games for their own sake, and are then being decorticated by Davey in an almost obsessional way. It then turns into a peering into someone's heart where Davey extrapolates on Coda's behaviour and you start getting a narrative on depression. But Davey starts also talking more about him really than Coda. Near the end though is when the "twist" happen and you see Coda basically telling Davey to fuck off, stop tampering with his games and Davey himself proceeding to transform the whole thing into an apology instead.
Thing is that, looking back, there's too much obvious discrepancies for the work to even be considered biographica anymore. Davey mentions that Coda started adding lamp posts to his game while "Coda", in his last words, asks Davey to stop adding them himself. Also that Davey is misinterpreting all his stuff and whatnot. That and the whole shtick of doing unfinished games yet filling them with a shitload of details, to the point where it just seems too incoherent for someone as shut-in as Coda, and who apparently doesn't want to be diagnosed upon anyway if we trust that the last words are indeed "his".
Basically wondering if this whole thing is a meta commentary about the relations between developpers and players who try to seek larger meanings through the games they play and assign themselves to the product, or even try to overanalyse and assign a psychology or a lore to a game when it's not technically there.
And i know it's ironic that i'm saying that since i'm kinda doing exactly that right now. One thing is obvious to me anyway is that by the end of the presentation, it's no longer a biography
Also man has the comments under the videos gotten salty. It's like reading /v/. It's already not super happy here, but I didn't realise the fanbase got so bitter lately
I don't even think it's a meta-commentary on players and developers per se, but rather about the relation between art and it's audience in general.
How much can you really interpret about an artist through his work?
How much is that interpretation influenced by your own state of mind and what does that interpretation say about you, rather than the art?
When you share art outside of the means the artist intended, are you really sharing it because you think there is merit to it or are you just doing it so people can validate your tastes?
And in doing so, would you go so far as to misrepresent a piece of art in order for it to better fit the narrative you have created, so you can be 'correct' or 'have it figured out'?
The real irony, which I'm sure was intended at some level, is in LP'ing this game. Are you really experiencing the game or are you just experiencing what a person says he's experiencing? In that sense, what Davey did was not so different from doing a Let's Play.
How much can you really interpret about an artist through his work?
How much is that interpretation influenced by your own state of mind and what does that interpretation say about you, rather than the art?
When you share art outside of the means the artist intended, are you really sharing it because you think there is merit to it or are you just doing it so people can validate your tastes?
And in doing so, would you go so far as to misrepresent a piece of art in order for it to better fit the narrative you have created, so you can be 'correct' or 'have it figured out'?
The real irony, which I'm sure was intended at some level, is in LP'ing this game. Are you really experiencing the game or are you just experiencing what a person says he's experiencing? In that sense, what Davey did was not so different from doing a Let's Play.
Edit: I thought we all agreed that youtube comments are bullshit anyway and are best left ignored?