Nuance, dude. It’s less attention-grabbing but it will render you more judicious when navigating the ambiguities of life.
You bring up Joy-con stick drift. Is that likely to have happened because Nintendo wanted to cheat its customers or because a certain stick model was the one ready-to-hand component which suited the design priorities of the Switch? I hate that drift is a problem – I’ve sent in three different Joy-cons with the issue already. But on the other hand, Nintendo fixed them all quickly and for free, and every one out of warranty.
And is that Nintendo’s response partly because they’re afraid of bad PR and class-action lawsuits? Probably. But it was also the proper immediate move to correct an issue which affected its customers.
Nuance.
Drifting issue was known for a LOONG bloody time, before Nintendo did anything.
Frankly, they didn't do anything until that looming class-action lawsuit came knowing down their door.
And the best part, they haven't formally recognized the issue to this day. Talk about nuance lol.
Can't do that, what will happen to the share prices! (again, who acts like this?)
When the nuance you allude to boilds down to pointing out how their manipulative, borderline illegal mobile gambling games have better droprates or being "slightly less manipulative". If only I played free to play games and were a degenerate gambler, I'd truly appretiate how less manipulative Nintendo's free-to-play gambling gacha games are!
When nuance equals saying "well, but EA is worse", you know you've got a strong argument there.
And have to say stuff like 'well, of course they would put tri-wing screws and not sell replacement parts, because if you want to repair your joycons (due to no fault of your own) or replace a worn-out battery yourself (by that time it's going to be out of warranty), that means you're a hacker, modder
or a really bad person'. Not making this up, Jubenhimer implied this.
Nintendo's good aspects?
Are they trying to cure cancer, colonize moon, minimize human dependence on fossil fuels or am I missing something?
Do they have DLCs? Yes.
Do they have paid online? Yes.
Are they engaging in highly manipulative free-to-play microtransaction ridden gambling bullshit? Yes.
Do they do cheap shovelware-tier cashins? Yes.
Do they deny hardware defects until there's a looming class-action lawsuit? Yes.
They do every "shitty" thing in the playbook.
I fail to see how they are in any shape or form better than Microsoft or Sony.
If people like exclusive games made by any of these companies, they just buy them.
No need to spread horse manure about some moral super positions or "nuance".
Maybe Nintendo did at some point do less anti-consumer shit, but that was - what - 10 years ago or something?
Who ever held them back, was it "good guy" Iwata or their own incompetence in regards to online and in-app purchases, who knows. But that time is over.