Sooner
Member
Billy Madison said:I disagree, Silent Hill 2 is a very good remake, but i think Donkey Kong '94 is the best remake ever
Billy Madison said:I disagree, Silent Hill 2 is a very good remake, but i think Donkey Kong '94 is the best remake ever
By that same logic the OG silent hill 2 camera makes it look like cheesy classic survival horror games like re1, galerians and alone in the darkNaw, it's a 7/10 remake and a 8/10 game where as RE1R & RE2R are 9/10 remakes(they cut some content) and 9/10 games.
Game's been padded too much and there's just too much combat that are detracting from the spooky aethereal SH atmosphere.
The new camera's making the game more like TLOU and other 3rd person over the shoulder games where as the OG had some more personality and tension with its cinematography IMO.
Have you seen? And you didn't trust Bloober Team.Against all odds, with all the expectations of Bloober not being able to pull it off, they've absolutely done it. Silent Hill 2 is in my top 5 favourite games of all time, so I went into the remake with expectations low.
What I experienced was the most faithful and respectful remake I think I've ever seen.
I just wanted to put this here as not often in this day and age do we get a gem like this, and the moment needs to be savoured.
Everything is amazing about it, the art direction, the gameplay, the sound (Jesus fucking christ you need to try this with headphones!)
Perhaps I am old and shaking my fist at the cloud, however this is by far the best release this year and should be celebrated accordingly.
The bar was absurdly high for a remake, and they've done it. They've done it well.
Absolutely well done Bloober team.
Is the point of slow survival horrors...Which is the point of Survival horror.......
No, limited action and feeling vulnerable is the point of Survival horror. James is not an action hero that can kill 1000 mannequins at the same time.Is the point of slow survival horrors...
No, surviving the horror is the point of Survival horror, doesn't matter if your char is retarded or not.No, limited action and feeling vulnerable is the point of Survival horror. James is not an action hero that can kill 1000 mannequins at the same time.
Low level IQ takesilent hill 2 remake is woke garbage and worse than the original. re1 remake is the best even though im not a fan of remakes since i prefer to play the original the way it was meant to be.
Yes surviving the horror through a gameplay that limits action, make the character feel vulnerable, reduces resources, etc etcNo, surviving the horror is the point of Survival horror, doesn't matter if your char is retarded or not.
REmake 1 mogs every other remake in existence.
Fight me 1v1 if you don't agree.
Fixed camera's are cheesy because those games were cheesy? What a weird stretch. I doubt the cheese in those games came from the cinematography, in RE1's case it definitely came from the voice acting and lines during gameplay and the cut scenes.By that same logic the OG silent hill 2 camera makes it look like cheesy classic survival horror games like re1, galerians and alone in the dark
Funny, cause I think REmake is so much longer than the originalNah. You know why? Because Silent Hill 2make's fatal flaw is that it's a remake of SH2. This is not debatable.
It's too damn long for the story that SH2 tells. It's like comically, absurdly long. Good game though? 100%. Not anywhere near the best remake of all time though.
Best remake is still REmake.
I prefer RE 96 over REmake, so no issue from me with any type or critique towards REmake.Funny, cause I think REmake is so much longer than the original
SH 2 is long but the pacing is pitch perfect. I wouldnt have changed a thing. The hotel alone is a game on itself and I loved it.
The story could have been told in 2h, sure. But its all about the journey, man.
You can move the camera in SH2 though. It doesn't have fixed camera angles like classic RE. Silent Hill has never had fixed camera angles like classic RE.By that same logic the OG silent hill 2 camera makes it look like cheesy classic survival horror games like re1, galerians and alone in the dark
Nah. You know why? Because Silent Hill 2make's fatal flaw is that it's a remake of SH2. This is not debatable.
It's too damn long for the story that SH2 tells. It's like comically, absurdly long. Good game though? 100%. Not anywhere near the best remake of all time though.
Best remake is still REmake.
The story is crazy but only really happens in the last little bit of the game. If you get the wrong ending, it will make no sense. The story is so good because at first it seems like a RE1 level story full of plot holes and random shit, but turns out every single detail has a purpose and meaning. Once you’ve done a deep dive understanding the implications of for example what each area is or why each enemy type is represented as such, the game dives down into some rarely spelled out emotions in ANY media. These things should not be spelled out so perfectly in a cheesy horror game. Really the perfect story. The implications!
didnt play the original, just beat the remake, and am now doing new game+.3) Story isn't all that great to me, I am not seeing the depth other people are.
He is supposed to be.In your dreams. Guy you control is a bad shooter and bad brawler.
It does get significantly better after the apartments, I agree that section was a slog, but the rest of the game isn't as muchGame has a major flaw, it has severe pacing issues. Og was 9 hrs, remake is been extended to double that length in order to justify the $70 price tag. Due to this some sections far overstay their welcome. For example I'm currently at the apartments and it's going on too long. I've also heard some of the later areas are a slog too. Too much time spent indoors and dungeons and not enough outside exploring the town. I don't like games that artificially pad out the length to justify the price tag. But still overall its a very good game so far, lovely atmosphere and graphics and music, voice acting etc. Everything is on point except for the extended length.
Actually it's not much longer, or at least it isn't twice as long as the original or more like the SH2R. And I replayed both versions of RE in the last year (after SH2R).Funny, cause I think REmake is so much longer than the original
SH 2 is long but the pacing is pitch perfect. I wouldnt have changed a thing. The hotel alone is a game on itself and I loved it.
The story could have been told in 2h, sure. But its all about the journey, man.
I was replying to a person who was trying to downplay sh2 remake by saying it's a tlou wannabe because it has a "generic" third person perspective.You can move the camera in SH2 though. It doesn't have fixed camera angles like classic RE. Silent Hill has never had fixed camera angles like classic RE.
The story is longer because the areas themselves were redone to add more content, there also new places that enhance the original game I find it funny when people cry about remakes cutting content and then they still cry when they add more content.Nah. You know why? Because Silent Hill 2make's fatal flaw is that it's a remake of SH2. This is not debatable.
It's too damn long for the story that SH2 tells. It's like comically, absurdly long. Good game though? 100%. Not anywhere near the best remake of all time though.
Best remake is still REmake.
Fixed camera's are cheesy because those games were cheesy? What a weird stretch. I doubt the cheese in those games came from the cinematography, in RE1's case it definitely came from the voice acting and lines during gameplay and the cut scenes.
The subject matter in SH2 and the way it's handled makes it hard to call it cheesy.
Thats the point.In your dreams. Guy you control is a bad shooter and bad brawler.
Real life doesn't matter as the game is not a simulator.Thats the point.
You are average guy with and average skill with and average penis.
You wouldnt do any better in real life granted after killing so many enemies you would think your skills get better lol
Dont know what to reply to this lolReal life doesn't matter as the game is not a simulator.
I'm not crying about anything and I don't cry when stuff is cut from remakes (RE3) because I can always go back and play the OG. I like RE3make too.The story is longer because the areas themselves were redone to add more content, there also new places that enhance the original game I find it funny when people cry about remakes cutting content and then they still cry when they add more content.
Maybe this game set the ground work for their very own brand new silent hill game?I'm not crying about anything and I don't cry when stuff is cut from remakes (RE3) because I can always go back and play the OG. I like RE3make too.
I don't have any serious issues with SH2make, it's a really impressive game. The claim of it being the best remake ever though doesn't hold water because SH2make is hamstrung because it's a remake of SH2. Not that the OG SH2 is vastly superior, I honestly think OG SH2 is overrated to the point of absurdity. SH2make would be a better game if it was its own thing with its own story to tell. That's not a controversial take and it's not a fiery critique of the game, it's just pointing out something obvious.
Game has a major flaw, it has severe pacing issues. Og was 9 hrs, remake is been extended to double that length in order to justify the $70 price tag. Due to this some sections far overstay their welcome. For example I'm currently at the apartments and it's going on too long. I've also heard some of the later areas are a slog too. Too much time spent indoors and dungeons and not enough outside exploring the town. I don't like games that artificially pad out the length to justify the price tag. But still overall its a very good game so far, lovely atmosphere and graphics and music, voice acting etc. Everything is on point except for the extended length.
OkI'm not crying about anything and I don't cry when stuff is cut from remakes (RE3) because I can always go back and play the OG. I like RE3make too.
I don't have any serious issues with SH2make, it's a really impressive game. The claim of it being the best remake ever though doesn't hold water because SH2make is hamstrung because it's a remake of SH2. Not that the OG SH2 is vastly superior, I honestly think OG SH2 is overrated to the point of absurdity. SH2make would be a better game if it was its own thing with its own story to tell. That's not a controversial take and it's not a fiery critique of the game, it's just pointing out something obvious.
I'd also like to add, the best thing about SH2make is that it cancels out the brain dead hate towards Homecoming. SH2make is near 1:1 when it comes to piggy backing off of the things that worked well in Homecoming. For that reason alone, I will always be a fan of SH2make.
Sh2R goes beyond what REmake did, REmake while being nearly perfect did not add the actual canon ending to the spencer incident.SH2 Remake was great and I was someone who was very skeptical when it first coming out.
But with that being said to me the best remake is still…
My biggest and only issue with SH2remake is it goes little too long, no matter how good horror game is the longer it goes the less scary it becomes because we get used to the tension and in SH2 there are not that many enemy types that can support long run.Sh2R goes beyond what REmake did, REmake while being nearly perfect did not add the actual canon ending to the spencer incident.
Good question, I'm sure there are. Probably this thread would be a good place to post it. I'm at work atm, but will try to check later and post it up.Any good videos on YouTube explaining it?