Onix said:>_<
The guy is holding the case upside down, look at it ...
Huh no, that's the bottom of the shell.
Onix said:>_<
The guy is holding the case upside down, look at it ...
Yeah, the logo looks weird being both verticle and all the way at the top. Sure the current systems have the logo right aligned too, but you gotta take into account that it's placement just fits with the system, it doesn't look like the logo was put there just because.Goldrusher said:
If by backplate, you mean the bottom plate when the system if horizontal, then yes, now you are correct.Click said:Some of you guys are confused and have been comparing an upside down image of the BACKPLATE, thinking it is the faceplate.
Just look at Wollan's last summary of all the images:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=15874117&postcount=1201
This is the original (not upside down) image of the BACKPLATE (sideview):
This is the backplate (top-down view):
hirokazu said:If by backplate, you mean the bottom plate when the system if horizontal, then yes, now you are correct.
First pic is the front of the bottom plate (saying from of backplate is confusing, since there's really no backplate), the USB ports roughly correspond to where they are on the existing systems.
So it can be seen when place vertically, but on both sides instead of one?Raist said:I wonder what's the point of putting a logo on the bottom plate.
Raist said:I wonder what's the point of putting a logo on the bottom plate.
Raist said:I wonder what's the point of putting a logo on the bottom plate.
It'd still be vertical.JeFfRey said:For people who complain that the logo won't be horizontal when standing up. That way, ALL can be happy.
iceatcs said:But I'm still think the middle is same as bottom one but upside down.
I know, it is Onix view, Fuck my English manClick said:OMG, it is man. That image you just made is so incorrect.
Catalix said:It'd still be vertical.
Click TELL ME what I'm wrong but I've said same thing on my last statement as your quote but my lack of English that's all.Click said:Backplate, bottomplate, whatever. It means the same thing, regardless of how the system is placed.
iceatcs said:Click TELL ME what I'm wrong but I've said same thing on my last statement as your quote but my lack of English that's all.
Aye. that's what I'm more agree just 2 pieces case shell on these photos.Click said:I didn't say you're wrong. I said that image you made was wrong.
"Part 2" is NOT "Internal"
"Part 2" IS "Bottom"
"Part 2" and "Part 3" of your image is the SAME thing (or "part").
SuperSonic1305 said:*Jack Tretton walks onto E3 stage*
Jack: $299. PS3 Slim. In stores Monday June 8th.
Audience: O.O
*Jack Tretton walks off stage. Conference over*
*world explodes*
Do it please.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=15873513&postcount=1169Kyoufu said:I'm confused. 1500 posts in this thread. Is this shit real or fake?
SuperSonic1305 said:*Jack Tretton walks onto E3 stage*
Jack: $299. PS3 Slim. In stores Monday June 8th.
Audience: O.O
*Jack Tretton walks off stage. Conference over*
*world explodes*
Do it please.
Kyoufu said:I'm confused. 1500 posts in this thread. Is this shit real or fake?
JoJo13 said:
This is like, the slickest console I've ever seen if it ends up looking like that. Can't see how anyone would say it's ugly at all.
iceatcs said:I rather
*Wooden crate drop on the E3 stage*
*Kutaragi pop out from crate*
Audience: Ooooohhh *some flashing photo*
Kutaragi: I will work less hours to buy one since it is only $249.99
*Kutaragi walk back into crate*
*world explodes*
Yrah, at least the past 5 pages have been discussing this on the assumption that it's real already. :lolJoJo13 said:real.
why is it so hard to understand. theres like a million people still confused about this.
truth, every is expecting $299 in the next few months and that alone will probably get them to 13 million, but if they dropped to $249 that would be MEGATON and something MS would have to respond to instantly.Dizzan said:I think they need more than that. While it would be awesome, we are all pretty much expecting it now. (except Sep not June 8)
$299 would be great but $249 would be MEGATON.\
.
But if the current PS3s still cost about $10 more to make than it retails for, how much lower will they actually be able to take it? The $10 loss doesn't even factor in costs of shipping, as far as I know.Scottlarock said:truth, every is expecting $299 in the next few months and that alone will probably get them to 13 million, but if they dropped to $249 that would be MEGATON and something MS would have to respond to instantly.
Psychotext said:I think people expecting the slim to come out at a price lower than the current PS3 are going to have a rude awakening. I'd expect it to be positioned (temporarily) as a premium version of the PS3, likely taking the place of the current 160gb model.
I'd say it's quite possible that it could enter at the price of the current PS3 though (and the current PS3 gets a price drop). Then they can transition to it as the default model when stocks of the behemoth are sold off.
Indeed... a price cut on the old models, which they'll still have considerable inventory of.JoJo13 said:Sony's 2009 sales forecast guarantees a price cut.
Psychotext said:Indeed... a price cut on the old models, which they'll still have considerable inventory of.
Turk said:The listen up! guys really think this is fake. I hope they're wrong.
DeadGzuz said:How would you know this?
iceatcs said:I rather
*Wooden crate drop on the E3 stage*
*Kutaragi pop out from crate*
Audience: Ooooohhh *some flashing photo*
Kutaragi: I will work less hours to buy one since it is only $249.99
*Kutaragi walk back into crate*
*world explodes*
iceatcs said:*Wooden crate drop on the E3 stage*
*Kutaragi pop out from crate*
Audience: Ooooohhh *some flashing photo*
Kutaragi: I will work less hours to buy one since it is only $249.99
*Kutaragi walk back into crate*
*world explodes*
That'll never happen for obvious and less obvious reasons.Psychotext said:I'd expect it to be positioned (temporarily) as a premium version of the PS3, likely taking the place of the current 160gb model.
I personally think that looks way better. The glossy finish (and the curvature) are what gives the PS3 it's sleek look.Truespeed said:Glossy finish
So you don't confuse everyone with that diagram, I drew the rest of the PS3 shell:Onix said:
hirokazu said:I personally think that looks way better. The glossy finish (and the curvature) are what gives the PS3 it's sleek look.