El Mayimbe said that they're looking at all ethnicities for the role last night on Twitter.
I'm okay with this, but I'm still miffed about the age thing.
Ahh so there's now a formula
Make a claim
If it doesn't pan out backpedal
Then say the search is still on
Ahh so there's now a formula
Make a claim
If it doesn't pan out backpedal
Then say the search is still on
Nu Journalism. Everyone worries about being first, but never about being correctI'm not sure how seriously I should take claims that are simply posted to Twitter versus claims that are published on the site. Less seriously, but how much less?
I'm not sure how seriously I should take claims that are simply posted to Twitter versus claims that are published on the site. Less seriously, but how much less?
Eh Maybe strikes again.
He wasn't the only insider who bungled it yesterday. He obviously heard SOMETHING real, then leapt to the wrong conclusion... then leapt to another one. But the initial info DID lead to something.
In Mike Fleming's case at Deadline, he had direct quotes from people involved as he broke the Ghostbusters story... and then decided to completely misrepresent the nature of the story. Another case of good info taken to a wrong place. This time not through carelessness, but by perttiness.
This is why you need to cultivate a working bullshit detector, and not just read the first 2 paragraphs of any shittily written linkbait article and call it good.
To be fair, I don't think restating that an actor said he landed a big role... then assuming it's Spider-man... then coming out what role the actor landed is getting "info"
The ACTOR was the one who told us about the role, El Mayimbe got NOTHING. It wasn't Spider-man, it wasn't X-Men and it wasn't Deadpool. So he did nothing but get the attention that he so badly craves.
Just keep watching it, it all goes uphill from there.Does the Marvel Spidey actually have an official title? I'm pretty sure it don't, but it's referred to as Spectacular Spider-Man at so many places online.
I also just watched the pilot of the Spectacular Spider-Man Animated Series, and it actually bored me, and some of the style creeps me out, but maybe I'm just too used to the 90's show?
is Spectacular not on Netflix? I was hoping to see a few eps before my brother-in-law lent me his, aw well.
Rt/Fav this for that burn!Fixed that last sentence for accuracy.
Does the Marvel Spidey actually have an official title? I'm pretty sure it don't, but it's referred to as Spectacular Spider-Man at so many places online.
I also just watched the pilot of the Spectacular Spider-Man Animated Series, and it actually bored me, and some of the style creeps me out, but maybe I'm just too used to the 90's show?
Is Spectacular Spider-Man worth watching? My brother-in-law keeps trying to get me to watch his copy, but Marvel's animated stuff is so hit or miss that I'm never sure if it's worth the effort.
I didn't like it but I know a lot of people here do. I actually liked that MTV series with the stylish CG that came before it.
I'm confused over the last couple of days of news. So Leatherface is entering the MCU now too?
The guy who was casted to play Leatherface was confused for getting the role of Spider-Man.I'm confused over the last couple of days of news. So Leatherface is entering the MCU now too?
I'm confused over the last couple of days of news. So Leatherface is entering the MCU now too?
Fuck that little kid shit.
The guy who was casted to play Leatherface was confused for getting the role of Spider-Man.
I'm confused over the last couple of days of news. So Leatherface is entering the MCU now too?
The guy who was casted to play Leatherface was confused for getting the role of Spider-Man.
No, Latino Review confused Sam Strike for being Spider-Man.So Sam Strike himself was confused and thought he was going to play Spider-man instead of Leatherface? Wow, what a tease! Can't wait to see his Leatherface come chainsaw-to-hammer with Thor though.
Satan and Mepshisto are 2 different dudesHe doesn't look so badass when he invokes Satan because he can't accept the inevitability of death...
Mephisto just posed as Satan once, right?Satan and Mepshisto are 2 different dudes
Yeah. This is Marvel SatanMephisto just posed as Satan once, right?
You think MCU will ever have the balls to have Mephisto as a main villain?
Uh Ultimate Spider-Man is the definitive Spider-Man.
Correct.
This is some kind of inside joke I'm not getting, right?
The end credits scene starts with a view of a half destroyed building. Stan Lee is then shown walking around the building as a piece of debris is about to fall on him. As the debris about to hit Stan Lee, Spider-Man swings and grabs Stan Lee, saving him at the last minute. Stan Lee says thanks to Spider-Man as Spider-Man gives him a thumbs up and zips away
That entire argument of what is definitive and what is not is silly.
If you really want to get to the heart of it all, the only interpretation of Spider-man that could be considered "definitive" is Stan Lee's original run. Everything after that is, essentially, officially recognized fanfiction. Dan Slott's current garbage is no more definitive than any other adaptation of Spider-man just because of what arbitrary universe his Spider-man is a continuation of.
I'm stumbling around the interwebs, and I find myself at some random website that is discussing an apparent 'leaked after credits scene'. I won't link the site, because it is complete fucking garbage. Here is what they describe happens at the end:
I've that isn't the biggest pile of horseshit, I don't know what is. Who believes this stuff?
You know what they should do to show him but not have to commit to whatever actor and costume they hastily create now? Show him in a wrestling match on a tv in the background wearing something close to this:
I absolutely agree--I didn't mean that literally when I said only the original run can be definitive--I meant rather the opposite. Definitive character depictions can come from anywhere and anything. It doesn't really matter what continuity or medium they come from.Although I'm inclined to agree with your sentiment, I think that from time to time a storyline does come along and redefine a character. Maybe less so now, but like, the whole Phoenix thing happened to Jean Grey after Lee's time on X-Men had ended, but it came to define her character.
That's mostly true. The only thing that it really add to overall canon was Death of Spider-Man and Miles Morales. The rest is basically akin to an adaptation/retelling.The Lee and Ditko run is absolutely the definitive Spiderman. The death of Gwen and for better or worse the clone saga also define the character. Ultimate is a fantastic retelling of the story. But it doesnt redefine any of the characters or story.
Am I the only one who enjoys ultimate series more than spectacular? I have more fun when watching ultimate..
Am I the only one who enjoys ultimate series more than spectacular? I have more fun when watching ultimate..
Yeah. This is Marvel Satan
I don't see why not, of all the Demon Lords he is pretty clean, I mean Nightmare actually raped someone in a book, and they still use him.
Steven DeKnight may have confirmed that Drew Goddard sealed the deal for being director of the Spider-Man reboot.
He have since tweeted he just knows what he have read.
Man, I bet Dylan O'Brien is Spider-Man and Drew Goddard is the director. I will be satisfied if this turns out to be true, and it will! Don't disappoint me now Marvel.