It's kind of the present.
But that thing's dangerous. You may lose your arm if you put it through the hole.
But it's bladeless, there aren't invisible blades waiting to delimb you!
It's kind of the present.
But that thing's dangerous. You may lose your arm if you put it through the hole.
The future:
![]()
Perhaps we should just refer to them as interactive visual media.It's nothing to do with their collaborative nature. Games are not art -- they are games. Is basketball art?
But it's bladeless, there aren't invisible blades waiting to delimb you!
Or computer programs, like Photoshop. Is Photoshop art?Perhaps we should just refer to them as interactive visual media.
I see shows like that as "good" in that they entertained me, not qualitywise. Is that what you're talking about? Obviously a show like Yami isnt made with high production values as far as I can tell, but it is stupidly fun to watch. In a way I enjoy it more than much better crafted shows.
I suppose you're right. even I have "standards" though not many. Pretty much I just don't watch something if its boring. It can insult my intelligence, have awful art, and be written like a fifth grader, but Ill watch it if its fun.
Or are there?
It's nothing to do with their collaborative nature. Games are not art -- they are games. Is basketball art?
there aren't. I checked.
Several times. In reckless ways.
Maybe basketball was a poor example.Video games are not sports. A video of a basketball game can indeed be art. The interactive nature of video games does not invalidate or negate the visual or audio natures.
More frills!
Maybe basketball was a poor example.
Is Monopoly art?
Dammit, cajun. I'm trying to start a new fear here.
Photoshop is a tool, though the GUI could be considered art. Are you suggesting that a program could never be art?Or computer programs, like Photoshop. Is Photoshop art?
Isn't the point of that thing to be a safer alternative to whirring fan blades? Its notl ikely to cause fear unless someone fears technology itself.
No you won't. It'll just appear inside the corresponding orange fan.It's kind of the present.
But that thing's dangerous. You may lose your arm if you put it through the hole.
The point of the Dyson fan is to charge customers lots of money for something that isn't as effective as conventional fans, but looks cool.
No you won't. It'll just appear inside the corresponding orange fan.
Movies are not art -- they are movies. What are you trying to pull here pizzaroll?It's nothing to do with their collaborative nature. Games are not art -- they are games. Is basketball art?
It's nothing to do with their collaborative nature. Games are not art -- they are games. Is basketball art?
If that was true, I would have bought one already![]()
No you won't. It'll just appear inside the corresponding orange fan.
So you mean, it doesn't look cool?
So you mean, it doesn't look cool?
Nope. Its a stupid looking thing.
Plus, you cant talk like a robot in front of it.
You guys know what I'm talking about.
Seriously, though. Bladeless fans are great if small children are a concern.
Seriously, though. Bladeless fans are great if small children are a concern.
I wouldn't consider an interactive movie art, just for clarification.Movies are not art -- they are movies. What are you trying to pull here pizzaroll?
Why do you seem angry? Too many bad Suda games?Oh, fuck. Were you actually serious when you said that games aren't art? I thought you were just teasing us.
Look, you are on a video game forum. You are going to be torn apart while dragging the thread through pages of off-topic discussion. Learn to read the fucking room.
Nope. Its a stupid looking thing.
Plus, you cant talk like a robot in front of it.
You guys know what I'm talking about.
It's nothing to do with their collaborative nature. Games are not art -- they are games. Is basketball art?
I wouldn't consider an interactive movie art, just for clarification.
Are Choose Your Own Adventure novels not art?
I think you mean talk like an alien, right?![]()
No kidding. I'd imagine it'd help so much. No boo-boos from being curious.
If it had cat ears, then would you think it was cool?
Or at least [censored]?
Yes, he very much is.
If art requires auteurs then I guess filmmaking isn't art, either.
NoAre Choose Your Own Adventure novels not art?
This is where it gets tricky. I should probably think about it more, but it doesn't really make for as interesting discussions so I... don't think about it often.On the subject of art, what about interactive art? That's actually... art. I don't think anyone argues that it isn't. So is that different from interactive mediums being considered art? Food for thought.
That too! Talk like Novid.
But that's how children learn
At least thats how I learned what NOT to do.
Stick finger in fan blades. OUCH! *note to self dont do that anymore
That's how children used to learn about the world.
Todays kids are deprived.
Are Choose Your Own Adventure novels not art?
I played a ton of them as a kid. They're definitely not art.![]()
Stick your finger in, OUCH, where did my finger go? is more what would happen.
CAJUNATOR SUPPORTS CHILD ABUSE.
I bet he'd spank his future kids as well.
Stick your finger in, OUCH, where did my finger go? is more what would happen.
CAJUNATOR SUPPORTS CHILD ABUSE.
I bet he'd spank his future kids as well.
On the subject of art, what about interactive art? That's actually... art. I don't think anyone argues that it isn't. So is that different from interactive mediums being considered art? Food for thought.
I played a ton of them as a kid. They're definitely not art.![]()
Technically speaking everything man-made is art.
A big long dung would look better on a wall than most post-modernist art.So I make art everyday in the bathroom? Cool I should try and sell it. If someone can get paid for a urinal then I can definitely get paid for something a little extra after all.
So I make art everyday in the bathroom? Cool I should try and sell it. If someone can get paid for a urinal then I can definitely get paid for something a little extra after all.
You wouldn't be the first.So I make art everyday in the bathroom? Cool I should try and sell it. If someone can get paid for a urinal then I can definitely get paid for something a little extra after all.
But that's how children learn
At least thats how I learned what NOT to do.
Stick finger in fan blades. OUCH! *note to self dont do that anymore
That's how children used to learn about the world.
Todays kids are deprived.
Shit as art has been discussed before...So I make art everyday in the bathroom? Cool I should try and sell it. If someone can get paid for a urinal then I can definitely get paid for something a little extra after all.
It would depend on how the shit is presented. If it's just a piece of shit on a pedestal, then any meaning others derive is being imbued, not inherent to the piece of shit itself. That piece of shit is not, then, art, for as I said earlier, literally every piece of stimulus you'll ever come in contact with has the potential to elicit cognition, memory, emotion, etc. That's just how the mind works. What separates art is that it communicates something unto itself. If, on the other hand, it were a particularly shot picture of a piece of shit, or a poem or essay ABOUT shit, then whether or not it's art would depend on the way that its construction would communicate to the percipient. A dry, scientific analysis of the composition of the poop would probably not be art (though art could make use of such a thing), but a thoughtful, personal essay on that piece of shit contextualizing its place in a person's life would be. At that point, one would then get into critical questions of quality, which involves a whole OTHER layer of complexity and cognition on the part of the percipient, balancing objective qualities of the shit itself.