Star Trek into Darkness |OT| Not very tired at all

Status
Not open for further replies.
The guy basically achieved everything he could have ever dreamed of and then some, and has had smoke blown up his arse by the geek community for over a decade. He's now effectively one of *the* poster boys for that part of pop-culturedom.

It's pretty easy to see how someone could disappear up themselves in that scenario, although I agree it is a shame.

To what specific thing are you guys referring? Pegg still seems pretty down to earth. Yea, he probably has an overblown ego from the all the geek/sci-fi love, but was there something he recently said or did?
 
Even if there WAS something he said or did, it's not like he's the next Kevin Smith or anything. He's got a long way to go before he descends to that particular circle of nerd hell.
 
To what specific thing are you guys referring? Pegg still seems pretty down to earth. Yea, he probably has an overblown ego from the all the geek/sci-fi love, but was there something he recently said or did?

I wouldn't say there's anything specific, and I didn't mean to sound quite so melodramatic. Personally it's just that ever since around the film "Paul" - with its horrendously lopsided presentation of the religion/science debate - I've noticed a kind smugness in his opinions that's kinda not so great.
 
how did pegg get so obnoxious so quickly

i hope they all get burned for chasing the TDK carrot

The guy basically achieved everything he could have ever dreamed of and then some, and has had smoke blown up his arse by the geek community for over a decade. He's now effectively one of *the* poster boys for that part of pop-culturedom.

It's pretty easy to see how someone could disappear up themselves in that scenario, although I agree it is a shame.

you guys take that back! :(

LEAVE PEGG ALONE :'(
 
I wouldn't say there's anything specific, and I didn't mean to sound quite so melodramatic. Personally it's just that ever since around the film "Paul" - with its horrendously lopsided presentation of the religion/science debate - I've noticed a kind smugness in his opinions that's kinda not so great.

Oh I see. Hey, no worries if you feel that way. Most Hollywood celebrities are smug douches anyway. ;)
 
Name me a better blockbuster in 2012.

First, John Carter wasn't a blockbuster, it was a huge commercial flop. But I'll overlook that nitpick for the sake of argument.

And come on, The Avengers was not only a better movie than John Carter, but a much bigger "blockbuster" film in every way. I mean don't get me wrong I personally enjoyed JC and thought it deserved to do better than it did, but Avengers was a far, far better movie in every way.



Oh and damn you Sculli for seeing Star Trek early, LOL!
 
First, John Carter wasn't a blockbuster, it was a huge commercial flop. But I'll overlook that nitpick for the sake of argument.

And come on, The Avengers was not only a better movie than John Carter, but a much bigger "blockbuster" film in every way. I mean don't get me wrong I personally enjoyed JC and thought it deserved to do better than it did, but Avengers was a far, far better movie in every way.



Oh and damn you Sculli for seeing Star Trek early, LOL!

I can accept that you enjoyed both and think The Avengers is better (even if I strongly disagree), but if we're going to nitpick, even if you like The Avengers much more, how can you say it's better in every way when JC's OST shits on the chest of The Avengers?
 
I can accept that you enjoyed both and think The Avengers is better (even if I strongly disagree), but if we're going to nitpick, even if you like The Avengers much more, how can you say it's better in every way when JC's OST shits on the chest of The Avengers?

Yeah, good point on the OST. Okay, not in every way then, hah.
 
Well I mean,
it's not like he's really supposed to be hispanic either. If they had a rebooted Picard played by an actual frenchman I wouldn't consider that a breach of canon. It just seems like such a wasted opportunity to do the right thing now that Hollywood has a more diverse talent pool to draw on (even if it could be more diverse yet).

I agree, I mean I always envisioned him as
An Indian with pretty caucasian features, because I figured he was supposed to embody some of that Aryan superiority thing. On the other hand, Sikh's (to me) look pretty indistinguishable from other Indians. Assuming McGivers was right that he's a Sikh. Either way, not Cumberbatch at all, and I have a hard time believing they couldn't have found a guy to fit either of the above categories. And where are those pecs? :P )
 
The problem with the (somewhat) lack of hype on this is because of three things IMO.

1) The trailer shows zero story. Just action. The best trailers usually give SOME story, or the action is so mind-blowing that it makes up for it. That is not the case with any of the trailers we've seen for Into Darkness. While it looks technically capable, we've seen earth blow up in a thousand movies. Those shots aren't enough to get anyone truly excited.

2) I think all the 'mystery box' shit and all the toying with Cumberbatch's identity has worked against the movie. Just like it did with Super 8. This 'lets all get the fanboys talking and riled up' internet marketing strategy rarely seems to work as well as it used to. It's played out and too manipulative. People see through it these days.

3) They waited too long. If this movie had come out in 2011, two years after ST09, I don't think they'd be having this problem right now. But even for how well liked by the masses that film was...it seems strangely forgotten. People have moved on. The reboot feels like a gimmick.

Don´t know if I´m saying too much.

1) Well, that pretty much resembles the first 2/3 of the movie.

2) Let me put it this way: Cumberbatch is underused. Its all about his voice.

3) As a defense, StiD stands pretty much on its own feet, the predecessor is pretty much useless.
 
I can accept that you enjoyed both and think The Avengers is better (even if I strongly disagree), but if we're going to nitpick, even if you like The Avengers much more, how can you say it's better in every way when JC's OST shits on the chest of The Avengers?

Me and my wife really really enjoyed JC. I was pretty bummed to see this great foundation laid for the sequels and knowing there would be nothing built upon it. :(

OST is indeed great too.

Did you like iron man?

I loved Robert Downy but the actual movie was pretty mediocre
 
Just got back. This will be spoiler-free. I won't talk about anything at all relating to the story because I went into this movie pretty much completely dark.

I have to say that I'm pretty fucking disappointed.. in myself for not being hyped up nearly as much as should have been prior to this movie.

It was fucking great. It was such a great sequel that I'm still buzzing on it right now. I should say that I was a big fan of Abrams' first Trek film and that if you liked that, you will love this. If you hated Trek 09, then you will find plenty of things to nitpick in this film. It is a sequel to that movie in every way.

It was everything a blockbuster popcorn flick should be. It was rousing, thrilling and there were a lot of laughs throughout. But more than anything, it cemented that JJ Abrams is now one of the few directors in Hollywood who know how to put $200m (Edit: Just checked it was only $185) up on screen and let you see every dollar. Watch out, I'm about to talk about effects for a sec. This film feels SO much larger in scope and polish than the first film and it all looks absolutely fucking phenomenal. This is the sort of experience we should expect from budgets like that. Not shit like The Avengers - which looks downright shitty in comparison, especially for the amount of money that went into that.

I will say that the converted 3D is worthless, which is to be expected after Abrams made it clear it was forced on him. Though there are one or two shots that put the scale of some things into perspective that were rather nice. But otherwise I wouldn't bother unless it's the only way you can see this film on a big screen. Because you do need to see this film on a big screen.

The same kind of conveniences/plot contrivances that nitpickers had with the first film exist here, so those people will have a field day. But if you were able to overlook those in the first film and just go with it, you'll enjoy the fuck out of this. It's nothing like Prometheus' problems despite Lindelof's presence. You know this because - like Trek 09, the character work all feels very strong and organic. I was very much invested in what was going on and rooting for the Enterprise crew to kick ass. This is that kind of fist-pumping experience.

Everybody was great in the film. Even Alice Eve. I will say that some of the minor crew who got a little more due in the first film have been somewhat brushed to the side in this film, but nobody gets ignored. It all still feels like a group effort.

Giacchino is still Giacchino - which is to say that the score was everything it ought to have been and I will be purchasing it asap. Would put it on par or maybe slightly above the first Trek's score, though will have to give it a re-listen first before I decide.

I'm not giving away any of the story, but will put tags on this for those super-sensitive folk that might construe this next sentence as a maybe-possible-impressions-leading-to-ideas-in-my-head spoiler:
I can see a lot of old school trekkies being PISSED in this film.

This is Abrams' strongest film as a director. He seems to have developed a much stronger visual language than any of his previous films indicated. This was actually the first film where I could actually see him as somebody who studies Spielberg's craft - if only because that very specific means through which Spielberg communicates information to the audience about a character or place visually is something JJ now seems to be consciously aware of.

This was a great sequel. A solid 9/10 popcorn flick and I'm glad I'm seeing it again on Thursday.

More than anything, this just re-confirmed to me that I couldn't be happier that Episode VII is in this dude's hands.
 
In a word, Sculli, would someone need to have watched ST09 before watching this? My GF wants to go for Cumberbatch and it would be her first Trek.
 
A funny anecdote: this was a blind special screening that people had to pay for. My theatre marketed it as part of the 'Chicks at the Flix' campaign. It was either going to be an early screening of Trek or an early screening of Gatsby. 95% of the cinema were women expecting Gatbsy and when it became apparent that it was Trek you heard a mix of laughs/groans from all the women in the audience, while the odd 'YES!' from some of the maybe fifteen guys in the theatre rang out. Hilarious stuff.
 
It is. It's very much a rollercoaster ride like that film. Full of energy and mirroring that sense of fun and exciting action in a big way.

Thanks. The part that got me the most hyped in your review was that the movie does focus on the characters. That's something that makes ST09 really work and helps me to forgive a lot of the narrative faults.
 
I'm also now super sad that JJ has said he probably won't be able to come back for the third film.

But still so happy that EpVII is in his hands.
 
...Sculli review.


Outstanding, sounds like I'll love it just as much as I hoped I would. I have to wait until the 17th to see it though, such a long wait...

Think I'll watch ST09 this weekend just to help make the wait more bearable, lol.
 
I read a review on AICN. Well, the first paragraph because of warned spoilers, and they hated it and said it undid all the goodwill of the first movie.
But Sculli loved it, so faith is restored.
 
To be fair, I actually like John Bomba. Like. Not ravenous, hyerbole laced love like Sculli. It has a few really great scenes.
 
It was fucking great. It was such a great sequel that I'm still buzzing on it right now. I should say that I was a big fan of Abrams' first Trek film and that if you liked that, you will love this. If you hated Trek 09, then you will find plenty of things to nitpick in this film. It is a sequel to that movie in every way.

It was everything a blockbuster popcorn flick should be.

John Carter was the best blockbuster of 2012.

I'm glad that you liked it Sculli but I don't know man....., I don't know.

existential-crisis-gif.gif
 
I'm glad that you liked it Sculli but I don't know man....., I don't know.

existential-crisis-gif.gif

He has a point though:

Prometheus, terrible.

The Avengers, serviceable.

The Dark Knight Rises, disappointing. (The worst feeling.)

The Hobbit, serviceable.

MIB 3, lol.

Does Skyfall count? I'd probably give it to that, although I wasn't blown away there either.
 
He has a point though.

If Sculli loved John Carter then that's great but there were many, many films released in 2012 that were much better than John Carter IMHO.

If we're talking 'event films' (John Carter was never a blockbuster because it bombed) then Hunger Games was miles better than John Carter with superior plotting, characters and acting never mind big fall releases like Django Unchained which, while a drama, was undoubtedly an 'event film' in it's own right.
 
If Sculli loved John Carter then that's great but there were many, many films released in 2012 that were much better than John Carter IMHO.

If we're talking 'event films' (John Carter was never a blockbuster because it bombed) then Hunger Games was miles better than John Carter with superior plotting, characters and acting never mind big fall releases like Django Unchained which, while a drama, was undoubtedly an 'event film' in it's own right.

John Carter shits on both HG and Django. Sorry bro, you don't have the voice of Barsoom. :(((
 
If Sculli loved John Carter then that's great but there were many, many films released in 2012 that were much better than John Carter IMHO.

If we're talking 'event films' (John Carter was never a blockbuster because it bombed) then Hunger Games was miles better than John Carter with superior plotting, characters and acting never mind big fall releases like Django Unchained which, while a drama, was undoubtedly an 'event film' in it's own right.

John Bomba craps all over THG, which was atrocious on almost every level.

Django is obviously much better than John Bomba though.
 
Django was disappointing as hell for me. I don't think I'll be rewatching it for a long while. Hopefully it gets better on rewatch, but to me it felt like a lazy mish-mash of his previous two revenge flicks ad nauseum.

I really, really hope QT cuts the revenge shit out now.
 
Sculli have you read the less than positive reviews? What are your thoughts on the points they bring up? I really hope this is good :(
 
Sculli have you read the less than positive reviews? What are your thoughts on the points they bring up? I really hope this is good :(

Maybe but not quite spoilers.

Like I said, I can see this film HUGELY pissing off longtime Trek fans. I have judged this film as a sequel to the first film and nothing more. I do agree that there are some cheap contrivances, but could easily forgive them because I was enjoying the film and the characters so much.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom