But isn't that contradicting what Stewart said?
New Star trek series, will "take on Trump and Brexit"
https://www.dailywire.com/news/sir-patrick-stewart-says-new-star-trek-series-will-take-on-trump-brexit The new “Star Trek” series starring Sir Patrick Stewart isn’t being explicitly billed as “woke,” but it seems the series’ star, who will reprise his role as the legendary Enterprise...www.neogaf.com
I mean he's saying the show is "taking on Trump and Brexit"
So.... He's basically doing the same thing Mecha is?The dude is almost 80. He can say whatever he wants to a liberal reporter to get them to watch the show. There's nothing about Trump or Brexit in it.
So.... He's basically doing the same thing Mecha is?
His age makes it okay yet he's good enough to still work?He has an excuse. He's 80. Her only excuse is she wants those monetized views.
His age makes it okay yet he's good enough to still work?
Uh ok.
But isn't that contradicting what Stewart said?
I mean he's saying the show is "taking on Trump and Brexit"
“Picard,” he notes, is “me responding to the world of Brexit and Trump and feeling, ‘Why hasn’t the federation changed? Why hasn’t Starfleet changed? Maybe they’re not as reliable and trustworthy as we all thought.”
This doesn't tell you how those things are applied in the show. Social-politcal unrest, corrupt figures in power and people being unjustly persecuted are not new things for Star Trek to deal with.
Agree she should have watched the whole episode before forming an opinion.Multiple people in this thread have said it's not anti-Trump, but you watch one YouTube video from someone who didn't even watch the whole episode and believe them over people in this thread who have actually watched it.
So the Trump thing: Picard does take a stance against isolationism, against xenophobia and for compassion for people in need of help. This is probably in part inspired but current political developments and closer aligning with the left-wing view on such issues than the Trump or Brexiteer view on such things. But it is not hamfisted "Trump is bad" or anything. It is thoughtful, well-conveyed and absolutely in line with what Star Trek has always been.But isn't that contradicting what Stewart said?
New Star trek series, will "take on Trump and Brexit"
https://www.dailywire.com/news/sir-patrick-stewart-says-new-star-trek-series-will-take-on-trump-brexit The new “Star Trek” series starring Sir Patrick Stewart isn’t being explicitly billed as “woke,” but it seems the series’ star, who will reprise his role as the legendary Enterprise...www.neogaf.com
I mean he's saying the show is "taking on Trump and Brexit"
That's good to hear.So the Trump thing: Picard does take a stance against isolationism, against xenophobia and for compassion for people in need of help. This is probably in part inspired but current political developments and closer aligning with the left-wing view on such issues than the Trump or Brexiteer view on such things. But it is not hamfisted "Trump is bad" or anything. It is thoughtful, well-conveyed and absolutely in line with what Star Trek has always been.
But the "true fans" on YouTube claim it is.
She's more than likely a real fan. A bit outragey? Perhaps. It's her opinion though and I think she legitimately believes what she's saying. My only issue with it is she should have at least watched the episode in full. It's like those journos who play one hour of Death Stranding and yelling "it stinks!"And people on youtube never ever use click-bait or try to stir controversy for views?
If no one ever mentioned Trump or Brexit no one would see any of that in the first episode of the show.
She's more than likely a real fan. A bit outragey? Perhaps. It's her opinion though and I think she legitimately believes what she's saying. My only issue with it is she should have at least watched the episode in full. It's like those journos who play one hour of Death Stranding and yelling "it stinks!"
I suffered through the entirety of Batman v Superman. It did something far worse than shove politics down my gullet - it was a fucking bore.
Ok so I was guilty of turning off Ghostbustets 2016 half way through....
I hate Star Trek Discovery and had low expectations for Star Trek Picard as a consequence. My expectations were blown out of the water though. It is Star Trek in 2020, not action science fiction with Star Trek window dressing.That's good to hear.
I suppose he shouldn't have "mouthed off" as you said in the way he did, creating more divide.
I just hope it's better than STD. Politics wasn't my concern at all with that - it was just a lousy show from at least the first season I saw.
This review is total bullshit. Too political, too much talking about ethics... has she ever watched Next Generation? And yes, it does show that she has only watched a small part of the episode, because one character she criticises particularly strongly for being overpowered, well...dies
This was such a low effort jab with no substance at all.
Yes, she is. And yes, he was.i haven't see the video...She talk about the android girl? Well...data himself Is overpowered,She never seen next generation
So far there has not been a single metal alien in the series anyway, I will inform you when that changes.I mean NG talked about political stuff all the time but that was the 80s and 90s when sanity was more wide spread. Shit these days just avoid it all together! I will wait until people in real life start bugging me to watch... that's my measure for if it's worth my time anymore.
I'm someone who has been very very very VERY unhappy with Star Trek for a long time. I haven't bothered with Discovery because it sounds so god awful from the Red Letter Media videos I've watched on it, that it didn't sound worth my time.
That being said, I decided to watch this first episode of Picard because it is Patrick Stewart and I wanted to see how it turned out. I did only watch it once, but I do feel like it was decent. It's not perfect by any means, and like with Nemesis before, it's annoying when they talk about Androids and never seem to remember that Lore existed, but besides that I enjoyed the set up. I also liked why Picard left Starfleet, it was a believable reason. So far I'm engaged (no pun intended), and I'm interested to see where it goes from here.
I just wanted to point out though that this is a big step for me, because I'm an old Trekkie from way back. Loved TOS, and TNG, but never really cared for DS9, only a few episodes of VOY were alright to me, and ENT was garbage to me also. All the TNG movies were also kinda terrible to me as well, so to watch something that was decent again was nice. I'm still anticipating being disappointed by the rest of the season though.
Also, Picard saved Data in one of the best Star Trek episodes ever and one of the most remarkable Data-episodes, The Measure of a Man. Picard and Data certainly were friends and, more importantly, for STP, deeply respected each other.Red Letter Media's review is pretty bad. Their insistence that Picard and Data weren't friends is bizarre, especially when they're ranting about how the writers clearly know nothing about Trek. Picard and Data frequently have conversations about philosophy or culture throughout the show. And Data, you know, died to save Picard as he directly references in S1.
Lots of dumb illogical stuff that shows the producers don't know their trek lore and use member berries and cameos to pull in viewers.40 minutes? A review as long as the episode?
Can anyone summarize?
Red Letter Media's review is pretty bad. Their insistence that Picard and Data weren't friends is bizarre, especially when they're ranting about how the writers clearly know nothing about Trek. Picard and Data frequently have conversations about philosophy or culture throughout the show. And Data, you know, died to save Picard as he directly references in Ep1.
Many of the clips they use to "prove" this are either out of context (did I see Lore in there?) or from the frequently-awful early phase of TNG, where Picard was actually pretty hard to like.
While the show is taking some influence from contemporary real-world politics, Trek has always done this to a degree and at least so far it doesn't feel too heavy-handed or directly allegorical. This is far away from "Make the Empire Glorious Again."
40 minutes? A review as long as the episode?
Can anyone summarize?
Been anticipating this
Mike and Rich give us.....
re:View - Picard
“The writers know as much about Star Wars as Jay does.” Basically calling them Casuals
I thought the episode was okay, but there were things about it that I disliked that I couldn't explain. Mike and Rich do a good job breaking down all the flaws that only diehard TNG fans would identify. They were right about these new Trek series written by people who only have a surface level understanding of the franchise like Jay.
Mike and Rich explain that they like DS9 despite it's somewhat cynical take on Star Trek. But they never wanted it to be the NORM.The DISCO S3 show runners are HUGE DS9 fans. Which is probably why one of the places the season goes is Trill.